User talk:AKA Casey Rollins

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! AKA Casey Rollins, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Whispe ring 21:39, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia (talk) 23:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mz7 (talk) 20:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Proposed deletion of Minetest

The article Minetest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable game.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Minetest

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Minetest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Minetest, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. We aren't the Spanish Wikipedia, and not every article on the English Wikipedia is a good one. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Christian dance, electronic, and techno artists may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Sheila Walsh (singer)|Sheila Walsh]] (''Transatlantic Remixes''))

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Strt trbl

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Strt trbl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CEDM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WRQX, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Electronic and Mega Mix. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baseball Joe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

"Gutenberg"> [http://m.Gutenberg.org/ebooks/search.mobile/?query=Baseball+Joe "Books: Baseball Joe (sorted by popularity"] </ref> The books are difficult to find anywhere else.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:46, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. You have new messages at Mr. Stradivarius's talk page.
Message added 15:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 15:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WTOP-FM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill O'Reilly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CEDM

Firstly, no, it's not my responsibility to personally fix the POV problems in an article about a topic I don't have enough knowledge about to actually be able to adequately fix it — if you want the article to be kept, then it's your responsibility to create a keepable article. And secondly, if you're really planning to fix the article there are still other ways you can do that — such as submitting a proposed new article through the WP:AFC process, or creating it in your own sandbox at User:AKA Casey Rollins/CEDM. Bearcat (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, bygones. I'm not at all opposed to the creation of a good article about the genre, I assure you — it just wasn't appropriate in that state. When you've got an article ready, by all means let me know and I'd be happy to either move it into articlespace overtop of the protected page, or give you some extra pointers on how to improve it. Bearcat (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I made a couple of additional minor adjustments, but that's a much better job than before — so I've put it into place as a new article and removed the page protection again. Thanks for your efforts and cooperation! Bearcat (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. The further changes that I made were on the level of wording and grammar, and I didn't actually make any coding changes that should make the page difficult to edit — so at the moment I'm not actually sure how to fix the issue. Are you able to edit your sandbox version okay and the problem just applies to the article version?

I did get a notification yesterday that there was a problem with the coding of one of the reference templates. I just fixed that now, so try editing the page again just to see if that fixed your problem or not — but if you're still having it, the only other thing I can think of would be to post a request at WP:VPT (our forum for solving technical issues) to see if somebody with more technical expertise can help figure out the problem. Bearcat (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I MADE THE CEDM ARTICLE! STOP CLAIMING IT AS YOURS! -Westdog01 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westdog01 (talk • contribs) 22:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (AOL On) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating AOL On, AKA Casey Rollins!

Wikipedia editor SparrowHK just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work, but please consider checking out Guidance for younger editors

To reply, leave a comment on SparrowHK's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AOL On, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages America and Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Minetest, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. VQuakr (talk) 04:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Minetest

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Minetest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VQuakr (talk) 04:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your post on the article talk page. The article will likely be deleted for the same reason that it has been deleted before - it is not notable. VQuakr (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Minetest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of speedy

The reason I've deleted the page is that it had been deleted via AfD back in 2012. In order to get the page back on Wikipedia you absolutely must go through deletion review (WP:DRV) and request that it be restored. There's no way around that. If you do have new sourcing that would help establish notability then you can present it at DRV and other editors will decide if the page should be re-created or if the previous deletion should stand. They would have to be very, very strong sources in order to overturn the AfD, especially since it was so contentious. I know that you weren't there and you're not responsible for what other people did and said at the AfD but you will be going in there with a handicap because it got kind of heated- people are going to be on guard.

So what you need are basically sources in outlets like reviews by reliable websites/publications/etc that would pass muster at WP:RS/N. This means that routine database listings can't be used, nor can WP:PRIMARY sources like the official website. Not all reviews and articles are usable, as there are many that are posted in places that undergo little to no verifiable editorial oversight. Fedora Magazine looks like it'd probably be one of those sources that wouldn't be considered a RS because anyone can submit an article and there doesn't appear to be any editorial oversight to speak of. It doesn't mean that the site isn't popular, just that guidelines on usable RS on here are pretty strict. There are a lot of popular websites that aren't considered usable.

Offhand I'm not really seeing much out there that would show how it passes Wikipedia's admittedly very, very strict notability guidelines, so you may be fighting an uphill battle at DRV. It doesn't mean that it's impossible, just that at first glance it doesn't look like there's really a lot out there. The game does seem to have gotten some coverage from blogs, but not really from any that would pass WP:SPS. I just figured I should give you a bit of an in-depth reason as to why the page was deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I wouldn't go in saying that you're pretty sure that the game isn't notable, as this appears to be what you were saying on the talk page of the article. That's shooting yourself in the foot because you're pretty much saying "I know that this game doesn't pass notability guidelines and merits an article, but it should have one anyway." You'd pretty much be acceding the argument before you even made your case. A better way to do this would be to say something like "I acknowledge that there were previous concerns about notability and I understand how this could be the case since the game is pretty niche, but I do believe that there is enough coverage out there to prove notability." Not only does this come across as fairly civil, but it also acknowledges the previous concerns in a respectful manner. You'd then follow that up with the coverage that you've found and then briefly highlight how this coverage would be considered reliable and would establish notability. I'd probably recommend asking someone at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games for help in searching for sources and asserting what is or isn't a reliable source, although the reliable source noticeboard would also be invaluable with this as well. (WP:RS/N) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mandy (24 character)

added a link pointing to Bridgit

Sherry Palmer

added a link pointing to David Palmer

Wayne Palmer

added a link pointing to David Palmer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rise (Trip Lee Album) (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Rise (Trip Lee album) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rise (Trip Lee Album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 13:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Plante (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samuell1616 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Plante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

One life to live (talk) 13:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Five (TV program), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Eye. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Plante (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Plante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 05:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. You have new messages at Talk:Social Club (band).
Message added 04:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Connected (docu-series)

Hi AKA Casey Rollins. I have added a template to the draft you created at Draft:Connected (docu-series). Copying an existing article like this is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history. This is just a heads up to let you know. In the Articles for deletion discussion you would choose "userfication" which means moving the article into userspace just as you tried to do. Best wishes Flat Out (talk) 02:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transgender discretionary sanctions notification - FYI

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g. hebephilia), a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please also see MOS:IDENTITY, WP:Gender identity, and Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning_naming_dispute (related to these aforementioned sanctions). This notice is just for your information. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:47, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @EvergreenFir:. While I am a self-proclaimed "homophobe, the edit wasn't out of spite or hatred, I just wanted to clarify that he was born a boy, avoiding confusion if there was a sentence saying something like "She was born William" or "She was considered the greatest male athlete or all time" or something like that, y'know what I mean? AKA Casey Rollins Talk with Casey 3:33 PM EST

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minetest (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraphine was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Minetest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Jeraphine ^(talk) 15:56, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Minetest has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Minetest. Thanks! — Jeraphine ^(talk) 16:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

About this section of your userpage: User:AKA_Casey_Rollins#Self-Presented_Badges_.28Out_of_Narcicism.29

...see this: Wikipedia:User_pages#POLEMIC: "What may I not have in my user pages? ...Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing ... Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia, or statements attacking or vilifying groups of editors, persons, or other entities (these are generally considered divisive and removed, and reintroducing them is often considered disruptive)." — Jeraphine ^(talk) 05:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmm? AKA Casey Rollins User talk:AKA Casey Rollins 7:32 AM EST

@Jeraphine: oh yes! I remembered one of the badges that dares critisize liberals. Is that what you took issue with? If so let me know and I shall delete it. AKA Casey Rollins Talk with Casey 7:36 AM EST

Well I would personally say that it's all three of them but I guess the middle one can stay. In the first box you're calling someone a racist and in the third one you claim to be a homophobe etc. — Jeraphine ^(talk) 11:57, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraphine: I'll edit them, and remove the part calling people racists. But what's wrong with calling myself a homophobe? By all popular definitions of the word I AM, so...AKA Casey Rollins Talk with Casey 8:29 AM EST

I'm fine with you wanting to insult yourself but you're, in effect, saying "I'm anti-LGBT" which falls under the part that I quoted from Wikipedia:User_pages#POLEMIC ("...statements attacking or vilifying groups of ... persons ..."), and that box of yours also says you're an "islamiphobic everythingist". It's just unnecessary to have these kinds of divisive statements on your userpage, it creates an unpleasant work environment for others. If you don't trust my opinion on this then we can go ask for others' thoughts, but I hope you understand what I mean and what the Userpage guideline page means, and we can end this conversation here. — Jeraphine ^(talk) 12:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraphine: I see. Userpages aren't for political statements. AKA Casey Rollins Talk with Casey 2:05 PM EST

...Are you typing in your signature manually? o_O — Jeraphine ^(talk) 18:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh by the way I had responded to you on my talk page earlier today (User_talk:Jeraphine#Minetest)but I don't know if you saw it, though I pinged you. — Jeraphine ^(talk) 18:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

— Jeraphine ^(talk) 19:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraphine: Got it. Thanks. AKA Casey Rollins^{Talk with Casey} 23:51, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MakeMKV listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MakeMKV. Since you had some involvement with the MakeMKV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — SkyLined (talk) 19:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I made the CEDM article.

Stop claiming it as yours. I made it. Everything I edit onto that article, you always remove. It's not fair since I made it. I can't even request a lock on it anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westdog01 (talk • contribs) 22:37, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't help but overlook this and I had to make two comment: first, there is no such thing as ownership on Wikipedia, so no one can claim it. Second, every edit should be judged purely on its contribution to Wikipedia, regardless of who made it. If you have a problem with an edit, discuss the edit and not the editor. If you have a problem with an editor, report it so others can handle it objectively. — SkyLined (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Westdog01: I'm sorry, but I don't see any record of me undoing any of your edits. As for ownership, SkyLined is right; nobody "owns" the article, though I made its current incarnation. AKA Caaey Rollins Talk with Casey 23:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Westdog01: Looks like User:Walter Görlitz has been undoing your contributions. Not me. Go after him. AKA Caaey Rollins Talk with Casey 23:32, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Minetest concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Minetest, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Minetest

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Minetest".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 10:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NF (rapper)

you do not need to add language=en-US to citation templates. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Son Of Zorn Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Son Of Zorn Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CBSN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:American Housewife Promo Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Housewife Promo Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adult Swim Live Stream

Actually this is NOT new, they have been streaming the live East and West Coast feeds as well as marathons and the Adult Swim Live channel since September 2013, don't know why those two referenced website were saying its new because technically its not and there is an entire paragraph further down in the article that explains this and provides references to its original origins. YborCityJohn (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Incorporated Promo Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Incorporated Promo Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Upcoming4.me

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Upcoming4.me".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

You make errors in formatting like [[Fireblazin|''Fireblazin'']], which is more correctly formatted ''[[Fireblazin]]'' and then add massing numbers of empty parameters like those here: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=II_(Capital_Kings_album)&curid=47845920&diff=775088979&oldid=757545847 Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:04, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: Hmm...I was using the visual editor to add some citations and makes some edits. The empty values just showed up in the editor. AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 16:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And the references in the headings were their fault as well ; ) ? Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: I think I used the wrong link...that was what I call "rushed editing." AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 13:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Gumball Vol 10.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gumball Vol 10.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Gumball Vol 6.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gumball Vol 6.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gumball season images

Please do not upload any more images unless you know what you are doing. While all the images are fine, I have to go through and actually clean them all up, add fair use rationales, and add the proper licensing tags. Images are taken very seriously here due to the copyright implications and if you do not know how to properly use the image templates it would be better if you ask for assistance in the future instead of attempting to do it yourself. You can request an image be uploaded at WP:Files for upload or, if you want, you can ask me directly. I'm also happy to teach you have to properly upload images if that is what you want. I'll go through and fix all the ones you just uploaded but please do not upload anymore until you know what you are doing. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Majora: Thanks for the heads up; yeah, I was in a bit of a hurry and didn't add all the licensing info I usually do (see File:24- Legacy Title Card.png). Sorry for the sloppy work, that's my bad. AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 20:38, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. That 24 image is way way way too big and I have asked for an image reduction. It will be performed by a bot in about a day. There are a lot of little things like that when it comes to images. Better to not rush in the future please. Don't want problems coming later in regards to copyright. --Majora (talk) 20:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tuck Buckford (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tuck Buckford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

iSpy

I'm sorry, I'm afraid I can't help - I don't know anything about the series. Good luck to you, though. And happy editing! :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:51, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beleaf (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Facebook is not an reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beleaf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 07:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Kash

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alex Kash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Marvellous Spider-Man 02:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VGChartz

VGChartz is considered unreliable. Please see WP:VG/S for more details. -- ferret (talk) 18:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Claws Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Claws Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beleaf (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9 are useless for establishing notability because they are either affiliated or don't give in-depth, meaningful coverage to Beleaf.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beleaf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 12:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beleaf (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beleaf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:13, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beats1 (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Beats 1 instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beats1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 22:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Answers in Genesis, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: I am not adding false information. Please join the discussion here: Talk:Answers_in_Genesis#Bias.3F AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 15:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have edited to say that AIG has "a particular focus on a scientific young Earth creationism" clearly that is false. Theroadislong (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: I just changed it to say that it promotes young Earth creationism. Just trying to remove bias, that's all. AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 15:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is NO bias, Wikipedia naturally sides with the scientific consensus. Theroadislong (talk) 15:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: True; however, you would still need to prove that AiG's work specifically is pseudoscience is false first before just calling it pseudoscience. Just because Wikipedia agrees with you does not mean that Wikipedia is not biased. AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 15:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jytdog (talk) 07:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tuck Buckford concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tuck Buckford, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MacGyver 2016 Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MacGyver 2016 Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Excorcist Fox Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Excorcist Fox Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tuck Buckford

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tuck Buckford".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 15:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MacGyver 2016 Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MacGyver 2016 Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Beleaf concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Beleaf, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Beleaf concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Beleaf, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beleaf

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beleaf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JustaZBguy (talk) 22:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CBS Sports HQ (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at CBS Sports HQ instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CBS Sports HQ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CBS Sports HQ, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 06:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fox News @ Night Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fox News @ Night Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Story title card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Story title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ingraham Angle Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ingraham Angle Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Beats1

Draft:Beats1, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Beats1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Beats1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CoolSkittle (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

American Politics editing

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Lord Roem ~ (talk) 05:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is this due to my edits on Gab.ai, my reporting of Jorm, previous edits on other pages, or a combination of the three? I would like to know what I did that caused this punishment so that I can avoid further conflict in the future. AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 06:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as someone who helped craft the sanction mentioned above, I'll point out that this is in no way a punishment. Nothing has happened to you other than the fact that you have now been alerted to the sanctions. Only when an editor has been made aware of a sanction (eg by receiving an alert or giving one to another editor) are they covered by that sanction. As it says, it doesn't imply you've done anything wrong, only that you've edited in the area. Doug Weller talk 06:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thank you! AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 06:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your incorrect response to past complaints

There has been some controversy over the quote 'known for it's mainly far-right user base' on the talk page for the social media site Gab. Your response to the criticism was to add text explaining why it is known as an alt-right site. However, this was not a complaint. The original complainer PaulCHerbet complained about the statement that it's known 'for it's mainly far-right user base' not any hypothetical statement that it's known as alt-right. The reason he was complaining was that the embedded claim within the statement that Gab's user base is mainly far-right has no relevant sources cited, never mind whether the sources are reliable or not. Not one of the 3 citations even claim that Gab has a mainly far-right user base, and so this claim should not exist on the page as it is entirely unfounded and un-cited. Two subsequent complainers made this position more clear because I grant you Paul wasn't very clear on what he was precisely complaining about, and they seem to have been mentally ignored even though they made their criticism clear that this severe accusation with no relevant citations should not remain. There is some policy here against starting fresh talk on issues that have already been raised, but I am not bringing it up as if it has not been discussed, I am messaging you under the justification that I believe you acted inappropriately to the original situation. With that said, could you please change this quote to something like 'known mainly for it's far-right user base'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.108.112 (talk) 14:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1) Which response specifically are you referring to? And what is it exactly that you want me to change?

2) Why are you popping up out of nowhere, after making one edit, and telling me what to do? AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 04:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shots Fired Title Card.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Rejoining the Fight Against Bias in the AiG Article (Circa April 2019)

Sorry Oldstone James for not responding to your email, I really value my anonymity.
It's hard to tell what edits you were advocating, as I don't think you signed any of your edits on the talk page. I would love to join you, but not only would I need more clarity as far as exactly what you would like to see changed, I am in college now and have very little time to join edit wars. AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 21:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Impaulsive

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Impaulsive".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Aunt Jemima. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 17:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Promo Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Promo Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christian electronic dance music for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian electronic dance music, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian electronic dance music until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Selfie Dad

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Selfie Dad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TCS4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TCS4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TCS4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Selfie Dad

Hello, AKA Casey Rollins. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Selfie Dad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:43, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit curious, what is the particular reason for the sanctions? I have been making edits on political articles for years with no issues, and furthermore have made even fewer edits on political pages in recent months and years. Does this have something to do with my edit to Truth Social, which was reverted immediately after this sanction was issued on me? Knowing the reason for the sanctions, if any exist, will be key in preventing me from running afoul of Wikipedia and their rules in the future. AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 17:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gumball Vol 5.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gumball Vol 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 11:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 November 15 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bull Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bull Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lethal Weapon TV Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lethal Weapon TV Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]