User talk:51.37.79.136

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 13:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muslim Sisters of Éire (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muslim Sisters of Éire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 14:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Teeling (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Teeling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 14:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. . Please do no revert or remove AFC reviews like you did on Draft:Brian Teeling and Draft:Muslim Sisters of Éire and please do not post incivil messages on talk page. RangersRus (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RangersRus: My civil message to you very clearly laid out the deficiencies in your AfC reviews. Your edits do not display sufficient understanding of either Notability nor AfC to qualify you to review articles. My edits were neither vandalism not incivil, and I ask you to withdraw both your warning and your AfC reviews to Draft:Brian Teeling and Draft:Muslim Sisters of Éire , both of which have multiple reliable sources independent of their subject that have in-depth coverage of the subjects. If you fail to do so, I will raise your edits for administrative review. 51.37.79.136 (talk) 16:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subject and topic do not pass WP:GNG, WP:NBIO and WP:NCORP. Familiarise yourself with these policies. RangersRus (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RangersRus: The WP:GNG states that "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."

The articles you dismissed as not passing this criteria had not one, not two, but half a dozen references that meet this criteria:

Draft:Muslim Sisters of Éire [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

Draft:Brian Teeling [9][10][11][12][13][14]

You have failed to provide a substantive policy-based justification for your inadequate reviews, nor explained how my edits constitute vandalism or incivility. This is your final chance to withdraw your edits. 51.37.79.136 (talk) 16:47, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have already crossed incivility by trolling and reverting messages on my talk page again and again and vandalism by removing AFC reviews on two drafts. I already gave you the reason and justification in my AFC reviews and the message above. If you are not happy, least you can do is resubmit for review again but do not remove or revert the previous reviews. Hope this finally clears things up. RangersRus (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported your conduct, including baseless claims of vandalism, to the Administrators' Noticeboard for Incidents. 51.37.79.136 (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muslim Sisters of Éire has been accepted

Muslim Sisters of Éire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 19:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Teeling (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheTechie was:

There has been no change since the last submission. Resubmitting the draft may result in rejection, which means that this draft may no longer be considered for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Teeling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 51.37.79.136! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have failed to assess this article adequately against the inclusion criteria. I will follow up on your talk page. 51.37.79.136 (talk) 22:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Teeling has been accepted

Brian Teeling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 18:56, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.