User talk:2000editor

Welcome!

Hi 2000editor! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 06:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Kon gopone mon bheseche 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kon gopone mon bheseche 2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Alor Kole.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alor Kole.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Jogomaya.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jogomaya.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalism - UEFA Euro 2024

If you continue your unfounded and incorrect edits regarding the overview map, I will have to report you on [[WP:AIV] and your account may be blocked. Therefore, refrain from doing this. Bildersindtoll (talk) 11:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what type of vandalism I did only i change that qualified team photo file page from front page to that inside qualified team page so what is it wrong 2000editor (talk) 11:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2000editor, on the procedural side, your edit was good faith and does not appear to be vandalism.

On the content side, I agree with you that the image crowds the top of the article if it's placed there, plus the context of what the image is isn't clear. I've removed the double image from the top. —C.Fred (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding what i am saying 2000editor (talk) 11:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both of you should not talk around the issue and confirm each other. The overview map was and is there for good reasons, which I have also clearly explained. You moved it to another position without justification. Does not work like that. Otherwise, understandable reasons must be given on the article's talk-page. Bildersindtoll (talk) 12:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that 2000editor (talk) 14:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bro someone again changed it again overview map was on the front page it already on teams page please correct it 2000editor (talk) 14:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For now it seems correct to me. Bildersindtoll (talk) 16:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for distributing you I am now again changing the position of the qualified nations image of euro 2024 please don't mind it 2000editor (talk) 08:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alor Kole, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romance and Bengali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geeta LL.B, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Action, Romance and Thriller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kar Kachhe Koi Moner Kotha, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romantic and Romance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ashtami (TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ashtami (TV series) 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and use the other draft at Draft:Ashtami (TV series), it has sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Coop (talk) 07:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i need a help can you help me?? 2000editor (talk) 10:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zee Bangla, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 07:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a fictional show that aired before jogomaya show but someone removed it and also that reliable source so that's why I added it because I knew that it aired on that time 2000editor (talk) 07:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that. However, you added it back without a source. This is not allowed. If I missed something please let me know as I do not see where a reference was added. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zee Bangla, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 22:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Zee Bangla. Final warning. You cannot keep adding unsourced content to the page. CNMall41 (talk) 08:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

now I add it's references so is it okay now 2000editor (talk) 08:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the three sources you added are problematic. Two fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and the first reference you added says "will be" indicating future, not current. I would ask you revert and use a reliable source. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok i finding it 2000editor (talk) 08:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

now it's okay please check it and tell me if I had to add something 2000editor (talk) 08:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashtami (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashtami (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashtami (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 08:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 17, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BB12.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, 2000editor. I noticed that your recent edit to 2024 Copa América added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 06:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Copa América 2024 Match Ball Puma Cumbre.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Copa América 2024 Match Ball Puma Cumbre.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Copa América 2024 Mascot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Copa América 2024 Mascot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Bangla 2024.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Bangla 2024.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zee Bangla, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You have done this a few times now with adding unsourced information. The program which I removed again is NOT sourced. The link you placed to the other Wikipedia page is a redirect so there is nothing on that page that confirms that season is on Zee. Do not re-add unsourced information. CNMall41 (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please look that the show is on zee5 the official app of Zee Bangla and Zee television so I add that source so what's the problem?? 2000editor (talk) 08:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Annh07. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2024 Copa América without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Annh07 (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it makes no sense because the competitions isn't started yet and someone update the tournament updates if you previously saw not fifa even euro cup they didn't update it until the tournament has started so it will be updated after the tournament starts so that's why I updated it 2000editor (talk) 15:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Kar Kachhe Koi Moner Kotha1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kar Kachhe Koi Moner Kotha1.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 13:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kar Kachhe Koi Moner Kotha1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kar Kachhe Koi Moner Kotha1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:UEFA logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:UEFA logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:UEFA logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:UEFA logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to India did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i added my country's chief justice name and our lok sabha speaker name 2000editor (talk) 16:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024 edit warring notice

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PadFoot (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the three revert rule can you explain me?? 2000editor (talk) 11:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zee Bangla, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reference you used is unreliable. Please look at the byline as it falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. CNMall41 (talk) 08:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Six, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's already said that Stephen mcfrelly only writing the script of Avengers doomsday and secret wars that's all mention there so please read that reference and then you understand that 2000editor (talk) 09:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source does not, however, state that Waldron's work is being removed or that he will not be credited for his script contributions, unlike Loveness whose work was replaced. Inferring Waldron will not be credited jsut because McFeely took over writing is WP:SYNTH. There is also WP:NORUSH and we should wait until the formal writing credits are revealed before making this call. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Nayan Rahasya poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nayan Rahasya poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 19, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 08:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i didn't know how to delete a page so I thought you adding something on it please forgive me 2000editor (talk) 08:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then maybe you should start using edit summaries, which you've been warned about three times already, including a very thorough explanation with a picture of how to do it in July. We could then have discussed it calmly, and the confusion would have been cleared up. Wikishovel (talk) 08:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone converted my article into draft so I send it for review so what should I do now please tell me 2000editor (talk) 11:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and WP:TOOSOON. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 09:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted it for review but it will take less than 3 months and the show will be start in next month so what's next?? 2000editor (talk) 11:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I highly put of the production details in more detail and submit this to AfC for review. I'm an AfC reviewer ping me if you want me to review it after you expand it. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review it it will be premiere on first week of October as per sources please review it fastly it my warmly request to you 2000editor (talk) 11:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please fulfill the comment I left on the draft so I can move this into mainspace. Happy Editing! Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it please tell me clearly 2000editor (talk) 11:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can expand it as adding some of the bits such as Nia Sharma possible inclusion to the show and the theme and concept. Sorry, but I think as of now, the article is too short and much is left out for the mainspace. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2000editor: I highly suggest removing the empty section for now Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if someone will create a new article of Bigg Boss 18 so what will happen to this?? 2000editor (talk) 12:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably just merge it. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18. Thanks! Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can I do it 2000editor (talk) 11:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 13:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2000editor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 13:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bigg Boss 18 will be starting from 06th October and we know the first contestant name but whenever I or somebody create the article they destroy it so please help me from creating the article 2000editor (talk) 03:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Nayan Rahasya poster.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Nayan Rahasya poster.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18

Hello 2000editor,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i create a new Bigg Boss 18 page I will give every detail as possible of this show so please help me that no-one can delete it 2000editor (talk) 06:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro speedy deletion the article again 2000editor (talk) 09:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 07:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

again you review my page every time whenever I create this page you send it to draft and I don't know what will happen the show is just about to start on 06th October my fav show and everytime I create the page you destroy it what's the problem?? 2000editor (talk) 09:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18, you may be blocked from editing. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 10:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i want to know when I will create Bigg Boss 18 article please tell me i request you 2000editor (talk) 11:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improve Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 by adding references and content, then it will moved to mainspace. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 11:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i already added many references so now can I make a page 2000editor (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 09:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So when season 18 will be shown in Bigg Boss Hindi main page then I will not edit in main page give me the time when it will appear on main page because the show is just about to start on 06 October today is 01st October only 5 days left so tell me when it will be come on main page i talk many editor but they didn't gave my answer so I expect to you that you will give me the suitable answer so please i request you 2000editor (talk) 09:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

whats your problem man why are you delete the housemates status, weekly Summary, nomination Table and guest Appearances column why?? Why are you destroying my efforts?? 2000editor (talk) 15:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will you just BE PATIENT?!?!? The show hasn't started yet and it will be trivial to add things back once that happens. Ravensfire (talk) 15:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok from now onwards i will not do and say nothing on this topic thank you for telling me the truth Thank you 2000editor (talk) 15:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did not say anything close to that, just to be patient. I get your enthusiam, but you also need to understand that it has caused problems. You need to pay attention to the messages being left for you here and understand that other editors are having issues with how you are editing. Wikipedia ia a collaborative editing environment, you HAVE to be able to work with others. Ignoring everything else and doing what you want doesn't work well here. Nobody WP:OWNs an article, but when there's a consensus, it needs to be followed. Ravensfire (talk) 15:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bigg Boss (Hindi season 18)

Hello 2000editor,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bigg Boss (Hindi season 18) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Bigg Boss (Hindi season 18) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and this has been moved to draft several times for poor sourcing. Please improve Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18, and be patient. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 15:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the show is just about to start on 06 October and you tell me to patient how is it possible I gave every references links and you said that it's poor so when I create the article when the show will be end that time please tell just few days left and you declined every article on Bigg Boss 18 i don't know this not happen in 2023 but this year you all the time declined this article. 2000editor (talk) 15:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18

The article Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Draft exists at Draft:Bigg_Boss_(Hindi_TV_series)_season_18 with substantially more details, edits an contributors, but hasn't been accepted. Creator has recreated this multiple times and probably needs to have this title protected pending the show broadcast

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravensfire (talk) 16:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is beyond disruptive at this point. You know there's a draft out there and are ignoring that and just recreating a poor copy over and over. That's not helpful at all and ignores the many contributions to the draft of a show that hasn't been broadcast yet and many details aren't released in reliable sources. Ravensfire (talk) 17:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It will be broadcast from 06 October and I am giving every detail now you can check it the most reliable sources you are talking about please check it don't blame me i am rectify my mistake that I had previously done 2000editor (talk) 17:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am blaming you for ignoring the consensus to work on the draft and get THE DRAFT accepted, rather than ignoring everyone else that is respecting that consensus. Disruptive editing like this is not helpful and just shows impatience that is not warranted here. The show HAS NOT broadcast yet, and there is WP:NODEADLINE on Wikipedia. Articles should be in mainspace when they are ready, not sooner. That the article has been rejected multiple times very clearly shows that it is not ready, and what you're doing is not helping the situation. Ravensfire (talk) 17:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The alternatives are to take this to WP:ANI for your continuing to recreate the article despite knowing about the draft and ignoring the consensus. Ravensfire (talk) 17:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravensfire (talk) 17:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I already remove the deletion notice please forgive me 2000editor (talk) 17:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18

There is good chance that Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 may be deleted to make way for Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 to be moved to Main space when it becomes notable. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When it will be become main space I will give every reliable references links so please consider it that it will come main space as soon as possible 2000editor (talk) 02:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB

To be very, very clear, IMDB is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. That's why it was removed the first time it was added (with a comment) and why it was removed again when you added it back. Read WP:CITEIMDB. This is something you should know by now. Ravensfire (talk) 03:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

soeey i didn't know that IMDb is not reliable source 2000editor (talk) 03:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would actually recommend you stop editing the page altogether at this point. It is being discussed at ANI already and there seems to be a WP:CIR issue. I am asking very nicely but if you decided to do another edit that causes an editor to address it directly, it will result in a request at ANI for you to be topic banned. I would stop while you are ahead. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok I will stop editing sorry 2000editor (talk) 03:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Bigg Boss 18 article

so now the Bigg Boss 18 article is just delete wow so all my hardwork is just waste of time and also the show is still ongoing but you guys never understand it and destroy that thing so we can update anything regarding this show so how we can back that article 2000editor (talk) 01:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a waste of time for a lot of people because YOU COULDN'T BE PATIENT. Do you get it yet? Trying to force what you want and ignoring what everyone else is saying DOES NOT WORK HERE. Remember that draft? That you started? And then ignored? That's what you need to work on. You might be able to asking the deleting admin for a copy of the article. I don't really care at this point, this is a mess of your cause and you still won't take responsibility for your own actions here. Ravensfire (talk) 02:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know who deleted it in just wake up and saw that my article is deleted so how can I find it the one who deleted it 2000editor (talk) 03:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chiming in here. This is not the first time you have ignored Wikipedia rules. At this point, you can find the article through the deletion discussion in my opinion. It's a WP:CIR issue and I am shocked that even after an editor mentions you take responsibility the only thing you want to know is how to get a copy of the deleted page. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can I get it back my article because the show is ongoing 2000editor (talk) 05:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not "[your]" article. You have made the request. Now please stop with the bludgeoning. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so when this Bigg Boss 18 article will be coming back because the show is still ongoing and this is the last time I was disturbing you 2000editor (talk) 06:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've been given advice on what to do above - read it and follow it. Or don't read it and don't follow it, that's up to you. Ravensfire (talk) 12:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok 2000editor (talk) 13:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say it that the show is still going on but the article is not coming back I can't update anything on the article sorry but I can't calm down I am a die hard fan of this show but there is no article of the new season and the existing article you deleted it, you guys tell me to give suitable things but after all of that it's delete after 24 hrs still its not come to main page I am not rude but as a fan i can't see this 2000editor (talk) 07:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel you cannot calm down you can always request a self block. At this point, I feel you are heading towards a community block anyway. If you don't WP:DTS I think the best option here would be a request for a topic ban at ANI. You are wasting other editor's time. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i just ask you a simple question I want a simple explanation for you but you gave me a complicated answer just feel you guys want to neglect this topic just afk you when that article "Bigg Boss 18" will be coming back just give a simple answer then I don't disturb you 2000editor (talk) 10:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please it's my request to you that when did the Bigg Boss 18 article will be back just gave me this simple answer I beg you guys 2000editor (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have a draft of it. Work on that. Otherwise, your sinking editors time. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Trout me, pull the trigger.)} 12:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i don't have the draft that's the problem I don't know where it was please help me to find this 2000editor (talk) 13:44, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Trout me, pull the trigger.)} 13:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I moved it to main space and then improved it 2000editor (talk) 15:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i have a question that I have a draft of that article can I moved it to the main space and then from there can I improve it accordingly to the rules can I please?? 2000editor (talk) 16:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't. Improve it IN draft space. It IS a draft. If you try and move it, it will either be put back into draft-space, or deleted again. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Trout me, pull the trigger.)} 16:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They already declined it and they don't care about anything the show is still ongoing but it doesn't move to mainspace how ridiculous it is and this is the old draft that draft is so perfect but they delete it 2000editor (talk) 18:27, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is FAR from perfect Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Trout me, pull the trigger.)} 02:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir I want to ask you that this draft is it for review or nominated for deletion and also when it will be came to the main space and how much time it will take please just answer this question 2000editor (talk) 08:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time for mainspace depends on a variaty of factors. It took a draft from me about a month. Depends on how notable or how many good sources you find. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Trout me, pull the trigger.)} 01:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me to fix the references 9,11on Bigg Boss 18 draft please it's my request to you 2000editor (talk) 07:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Trout me, pull the trigger.)} 13:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Do NOT. Work on it WHILE its in draft space. It will likely be deleted again if moved to mainspace.

Draft:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18

I have rejected the draft. Please do not resubmit the draft without consulting with the protecting administrator or with the community, and do not request that the draft be moved to article space. I can't move the draft to article space even if I wanted to move it (and I don't want to move it). Robert McClenon (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The title in article space is fully protected, also known as salted, due to repeated attempts to move the draft to article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So how this draft moved to the main page?? Because this show Bigg Boss which was popular in india is ongoing and it is now on season 18 every season has its wiki page and why not season 18 will not, I know this article is going on repeated attempts so please give us a solution that how it moved to the main page 2000editor (talk) 19:03, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did I say to consult with the protecting administrator, User:Liz, and ask her what to do to unprotect the title? Did I say to consult with the community, possibly at the Teahouse? Yes, I did, and I will give that advice again. Ask the protecting administrator why she found it necessary to protect the title, and what she thinks can be done to unprotect the title. Asking a reviewer to move the draft to mainspace is a useless request. I couldn't move the draft to article space even if I wanted to move it. Ask the protecting administrator what can be done to unprotect it. Asking reviewers to move the draft to article space wastes your time and theirs, and annoys the reviewers. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i already talk to her but she didn't answer anything from first day when it deleted to now so how it gonna happen 2000editor (talk) 02:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 02:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned literally countless times about Bigg Boss and your editing related thereto, and you persisted. You have therefore lost access to editing. Star Mississippi 02:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i already done a request to unblock me can you please check it 2000editor (talk) 04:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2000editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello to all the respected administrator, I am requesting you to please unblock me yes I know that I did disruptive edits and you all are warn me about this but I got panicked because this show Bigg Boss is my favourite show and when I saw that there is no page created on Bigg Boss 18 so I create it and then they deleted that article because there is no suitable references okay fine and then I again create the article with suitable references that Wikipedia needed for creating of article and again they nominated the article for deletion and then I asked all the reviewers that what happened it they said it this article is deleted and there is a draft so now you can improve from here okay fine I did that and then when I ask them when did the article will come to main page they got angry, so I just ask them because the show is still ongoing and I want to see this article on main page so that's the reason and I know they told me to wait but if they gave me the valid answer that when it will be move I will not talk of anything on this topic but they didn't gave me the valid reason and now I found out that I am blocked so please forgive me for the last time and I am new on this Wikipedia creation so please forgive me and unblock me. 2000editor (talk) 03:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are too much of a fan of this show to be able to edit about it as Wikipedia requires, to the point where you are disregarding instructions and advice. I don't think it's a good idea to unblock you if you are going to edit about this show. I suggest that you find topics that you are less passionate about which may help you to set aside some of your mind to be receptive to instructions and advice. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I placed your initial statement within your request as intended, it should replace the words "Your reason here"(for future reference). 331dot (talk) 08:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2000editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't agree with your decision that I am too much I also have the right to edit but I didn't do any disruptive edits if you are fan of something so that's does it mean that you can unblock him i didn't do any disruptive edits what iam done that I create a article so that's my mistake?? I want to contribute to Wikipedia so that's my mistake?? And you tell me that i have to find less passionate topic. If someone is a fan of something so that's a mistake?? I am a fan of this show so that's my mistake?? Wow Wikipedia team you guys wanted editor who are less passionate about something then go ahead!! But because I respected you so please unblock me. 2000editor (talk) 09:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I again fixed your request, you need to remove the words "your reason here" and place your initial statement where those words were. Someone else will review it, but you have no "right" to edit this privately operated website. Your edits were indeed disruptive and until you can tell us how, you won't be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2000editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So I want my account back and the valid is that many time I watch that misinformation was placed in any article and I rectify it also so it does it mean that I fully concentrated on Bigg Boss 18 article and if you talk about Bigg Boss 18 article, when the show was announced i create a article for the new season and it's not wrong and then they deleted it because the show hasn't started yet and I didn't provide suitable references okay, then next time I created before one week of the show, and then they deleted it because the show hasn't started yet so what does it mean?? Because the show hasn't started you haven't right to create any article and then I create the article just one day of the show launch, what they did they nominated the article for deletion and they told me I did disruptive edits what?? Are you serious?? Because I didn't follow your order so that means I did disruptive edits, Wikipedia is here e to contribute information and when I saw that my fav show's new season wiki page hasn't created till so I created it, is it necessary that when show will be start then you will create a page?? But it doesn't happen in previous season wiki page that page is created before the show start but why now?? Because I did provide better information than other so that's why many old editor didn't like that and they block me is that what you mean?? Because I didn't find any valuable reasons for that so it's my request to you please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Your unblock request fails to address your disruptive edits, and indeed shows you have no understanding of how they were disruptive. Whpq (talk) 15:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2000editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

so I know what is disruptive edits that does it mean you can unblock me you didn't find out why the disruptive edits has occurred you didn't ask me about that and you didn't investigate the situation why the editor has doing disruptive edits we have to ask him just gave the warning and then block that editor this is totally injustice to me i don't know why you guys doing that?? Are you having problem with me??This is totally injustice thing I am kindly requesting you please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Please see Malcolmxl5's note below regarding the Hindi Wikipedia. Daniel (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

स्वागतम्!

नमस्कार, 2000editor, क्या आपको मालूम है कि यहाँ एक Hindi Wikipedia है? यहाँ के बजाय आप वहां योगदान करना पसंद कर सकते हैं। किसी. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2000editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

okay fine you guys won and i accept my defeat and i understand that what is called disruptive edits but please it's my request to you give me a last chance to editing and i promise that I will not do any disruptive edits and everybody should get last chance so please give me a last chance and I want to edit in English Wikipedia and it's a last time I beg you please unblock my account, I will be grateful to you and if you declined it then I will be not appeal to unblock me.

Decline reason:

Editor appears to lack the competence required to edit Wikipedia. 6 unblock requests while offering no new information has become disruptive. Declining and revoking talk page access. Daniel (talk) 05:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Begging for a last chance is not a successful strategy for getting unblocked. You need to demonstrate that you know why your editing was disruptive and how you will avoid this in the future. You will not be unblocked so you can return to the same behavior that caused you to be blocked in the first place. I really encourage you to read the guide to being unblocked that was linked to the notice that came when you were blocked. It tells you exactly what you need to do. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2000editor, this isn't about winning or losing. It's not about being defeated. It's about you recognizing that while done with good intentions, your editing to push one particular article was ultimately disruptive to Wikipedia. Passion and enthusiam for a subject is a good thing, but it needs to be channeled to be within Wikipedia policies and guidelines and as a newish editor, you didn't channel that energy, but pushed and demanded that you get your way and everything else didn't matter. Can you see how that comes across poorly to others trying to help you?

At this point, you need to realize that there is a finite amount of time and energy that admins are willing to put into your unblock requests before your talk page gets locked. You're at that point, and there is a request at WP:AN to have your page locked because the unblock requests above that you basically spammed shows zero effort on your part to understand how your actions were disruptive. This isn't about any other editor. This isn't about any particular article at this point. This is about you, your actions and how you ignored Wikipedia policies repeatedly. That's it. That's all it's about. Quite honestly, I would suggest you ask for this request to be put on hold and take some time to think and reflect on your actions that are considered disruptive. It doesn't matter if you think they were made with good intentions, it's about how others view your actions. Read the links above, think on what happened and try to put together an unblock request that clearly explains how your actions were disruptive (hint - saying "i understand that what is called disruptive edits" doesn't show that you do actually understand that) and how you will change your actions in the future. And then hope you haven't exhausted all patience from the admins here. Ravensfire (talk) 14:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for guiding me 2000editor (talk) 14:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2000editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

first of all I say to all of the community and I know what is disruptive edits and i realise that many times I fails to cite sources, disregards other editors and sometimes I ignore community input and I know it's a huge mistake but I promised you that if you will unblock me I will follow the Wikipedia policy, I will never disrespect any other editors and I will provide cite sources and i will value every community input so please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you already have an open unblock request. You are free to modify that one if you wish, or even remove it, but please, no more than one open unblock request at a time. Yamla (talk) 20:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2024

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Daniel (talk) 06:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Following from what you said in UTRS appeal #95287, and with the agreement of Daniel, who removed your ability to edit this page, I have restored that ability, so that you can post an unblock request here. JBW (talk) 22:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2000editor. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 17:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think in fairness to the editor, they created their sockpuppet account only after I told them I would restore their access to this page to allow an unblock request, and then accidentally failed to do so. Under those circumstances I can sympathise with them, and even though using another account to get round the block was not the right thing to do, I think those circumstances should be considered a significant mitigating factor. I apologise for my failure to restore talk page access, which I have now done. JBW (talk) 21:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Izno: @JBW: - would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 16:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No strong comment, beside that that's a lot of unblock requests. Izno (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is already yet another suspected sock here that probably ought to be mentioned, I haven't looked into it yet. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2000editor. Izno (talk) 01:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight: No, I wouldn't object. I'm not sure how successful an unblock is likely to be, but I'm a great believer in giving editors a chance to prove that they can do better. JBW (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Izno @JBW @PhilKnight I would suggest a p-block from Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 as the unblocks didn't address that they understand why their edits there were disruptive. No objection if you disagree Star Mississippi 01:26, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the new suspected sockpuppet mentioned above by Izno, and there's no doubt about it. This is, therefore, the end of the line for this unblock request. JBW (talk) 10:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2000editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know that i did a mistake for creating another account according to the Wikipedia policy but I have no option left because I want to contribute on here I got blocked previously because of my disruptive edits and also appeal to them to unblock me and give them all the valid reasons everytime but still everytime they declined it and it looks like they didn't want me to unblock and all the time I told them that I will follow your rules and in future I will never do any disruptive edits and all the time I will discuss with other editors to edit or create some article but with all the answers they all the time they declined it so what can I do?? I want to contribute on Wikipedia but they stop me do so that's why I created a new account and also if you check my new account edit history i never done any disruptive edits and I am never disrespect any others editor efforts so you can see that history and then you will understand that I am not a bad editor many peoples done mistake in life but you guys made my mistake a huge mistake that's not right I don't deserve this from you. So it's my request to you please unblock me and I promise that I will prove you that I am a good editor.2000editor (talk) 05:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you read the discussion among administrators above, you will see that it was very likely to lead to unblocking. However, instead of waiting for your unblock request to be accepted, you went ahead with using another sockpuppet. There's probably no more effective way of making sure that a block for sockpuppetry won't be removed than doing more sockpuppetry while an unblock request is being considered. So much for your statement in this unblock request that you "will follow your rules". Your only chance of being unblocked now is to wait at least six months without doing any editing at all and then request an unblock. You have now twice been found to have been evading your block. If a CheckUser confirms that an editor has evaded blocks three times, then that editor is automatically banned from Wikipedia, which means that no administrator is allowed to unblock the editor, even if they want to; I therefore strongly advise you not to continue with sockpuppetry. JBW (talk) 11:14, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's a word of advice to help you if you do decide to make an unblock request after six months. You will stand a far better chance of being unblocked if you don't try to justify your block evasion by such reasons as that you "had no option"; of courese you had the option of not editing unless you were unblocked. JBW (talk) 11:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2000editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why I have to wait for six months and why I created another account because I know that you guys will not accept my request you guys just wanted me to stop for editing you guys just taken my rights for edits all the time I gave you valid reason and everytime you just declined my request and i don't know what is your problem and I am going for step by step proceding for unblocking my account but all the time you just neglected my answer and now you told me to wait for 6 months and I wouldn't have come to you so many times and made so many requests if I didn't have a deep love for editing and you guys told me to wait not for 1 month for 6 months and so I eagerly request to you to please unblock my account and please not requesting me to wait for 6 months2000editor (talk) 14:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think it's better if you wait six months before making an appeal via WP:UTRS. PhilKnight (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2000editor (talk) 14:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I give up. I have tried to help you to have a chance to get unblocked, but you clearly either can't understand what is said to you, or don't want to listen, or both. I restored your talk page to give you a chance to make an unblock request which would stand a chance of being accepted, not to give you a chance to post the same kind of inappropriate unblock request as before. Since you are just continuing exactly the kind of thing which led to loss of talk page access in the first place, and since you are clearly not likely to post a meaningful unblock request, I will prevent further waste of both your time and ours by reverting my restoration of talk page access. You know what to do if you would like to return to editing in the future, and you know what not to do if you don't want to be banned from Wikipedia. It's up to you. JBW (talk) 16:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

PhilKnight (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]