User talk:168.28.128.78

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 168.28.128.78, is registered to University System of Georgia Board of Regents and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

November 2005

This message is regarding the page Robert de Cotte. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Lupin|talk|popups 20:55, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

December 2005

This message is regarding the page Taiwan. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- pgk^(talk) 20:01, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

This message is regarding the page Nitrogen. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jeames 20:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page Abercrombie & Fitch on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. — ERcheck (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Your edit to Vladimir Horowitz has been reverted. It has never been conclusively proved whether or not Sonia Horowitz committed suicide or died accidentally. Harold Schonberg's biography goes into this in some detail. The tone of your edit was also POV and not appropriate to Wikipedia.THD3 01:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Hitcher II: I've Been Waiting. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NAHID 19:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Your recent edit to William Johnson (artist) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 00:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to William Johnson (artist), you will be blocked from editing. Neobros 00:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of one day as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 168.28.128.78! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]+\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]+/.*\.(jpg|jpeg|gif|png|svg), is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 18:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wicked (novel), you will be blocked from editing. Rtrace 20:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Ruehl No.925 appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Asmodeus Samael (talk) 00:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brown v. Board of Education, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Andrew Young, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Andrew Young was changed by 168.28.128.78 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-21T21:25:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Andrew Young constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

March 2008

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Louis Vuitton. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 00:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Louis Vuitton, you will be blocked from editing. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 17:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Goliath (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Gilly Hicks (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 23:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Deleted spurious information ("Outfitted by Abercrombie & Fitch...") and link added to the Charles Lindbergh (diff) clearly made for commercial promotional purposes by an anonymous user via this proxy server. (Centpacrr (talk) 21:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Abercrombie Kids has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 23:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Abercrombie Kids constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. treelo _talk 23:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Abercrombie Kids. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Abercrombie Kids. treelo _talk 00:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 24 Hours

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Sauron, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Abercrombie & Fitch has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gary King (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Abercrombie kids constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Gary King (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Interceptor (Pirates of the Caribbean), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Interceptor (Pirates of the Caribbean) was changed by 168.28.128.78 (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2008-07-22T23:29:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Works influenced by Alice in Wonderland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ndenison ^talk 22:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Planned economy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 18:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rock cycle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Techman224 (talk) 23:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hooke's atom, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hooke's atom was changed by 168.28.128.78 (u) (t) deleting 10070 characters on 2008-10-09T23:07:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dong Zhuo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 20:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Invasion of Canada (1775) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 23:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Montgomery Bus Boycott has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 21:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during April 4 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Virginia_Woolf. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Erik9 (talk) 21:26, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Junko Yoshioka, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 22:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Hepatitis E, you will be blocked from editing. Frankie (talk) 20:43, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2009

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Domino effect worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Sorry, but I have to remove your smiley face. :( Acebulf (talk) 23:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hollister Co., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hollister Co. was changed by 168.28.128.78 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-05-18T20:11:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page True and Living Church of Jesus Christ of Saints of the Last Days has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/rndlph).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Abercrombie & Fitch history, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Template:Abercrombie & Fitch history was changed by 168.28.128.78 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-06-30T00:48:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Hollister Co. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting Abercrombie & Fitch et al.

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Ruehl No.925. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. --CliffC (talk) 20:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Abercrombie & Fitch do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ray^Talk 15:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Abercrombie & Fitch, you will be blocked from editing. --CliffC (talk) 18:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote:

Pardon me, but hwo do you cite a comment an A&F associate told you?[1]

The answer is that you don't. If you received information from someone in person then that isn't verifiable, a requirement for all text in Wikipedia. See WP:V. Will Beback talk 00:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Graduate Record Examination. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. =Axlq 20:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Hollister Co. has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/hollister (matching the regex rule \bfacebook\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Gilly Hicks do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/gillyhicks (matching the regex rule \bfacebook\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

User talk:Hpfan1

Please see User talk:Hpfan1#Copyrights, again before making further edits. Will Beback talk 01:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked this IP because it is presumably being used to circumvent the block of User:Hpfan1. Once that block is resolved then this IP can be unblocked as well. Will Beback talk 21:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Little Boy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Little Boy. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 21:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abercrombie & Fitch, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abercrombie & Fitch was changed by 168.28.128.78 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-03-06T18:56:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Confederate States of America has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:16, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page 7 Burlington Gardens has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khfDee2zJcw. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Zouk, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 17:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please slow down. Don't leave the article in a broken state. Dawnseeker2000 17:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Abercrombie & Fitch, you may be blocked from editing. CliffC (talk) 18:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Bouyon music. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 18:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Soca music, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CliffC (talk) 19:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Mini-jazz and referencing

You've been extending this article in the past 2 hours - any chance of adding some references, which the article sorely needs? AllyD (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to leave a note about the same thing. The article had already been flagged since April 2008 for not having references. Thank you, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Young Jeezy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mercantilism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Montana (rapper) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
I did this because http://www.facebook.com/therealtana is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia.

We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk.

Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Marietta Storm. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it.
I did this because http://www.facebook.com/mariettastorm is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia.

We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk.

Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.