User talk:121Fam

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia I Announces my Retirement from Wikipedia Community and it was my own decision to leave. As of all thanks Wikipedia and the users Who helped in every single occasions and I miss everyone forever

By,

121Fam.

Welcome!

Hi 121Fam! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Chhathi Maiyya Ki Bitiya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Chhathi Maiyya Ki Bitiya, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rusty 🐈 22:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Disney International HD, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. also see WP:NOTTVGUIDE Waxworker (talk) 06:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shemaroo Entertainment, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 19:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pasand (TV channel), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 04:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shemaroo Entertainment. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CNMall41 (talk) 06:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dhamaal (TV channel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhamaal (TV channel), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhamaal (TV channel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shemaroo Entertainment

This is twice now that unreliable sources, specifically those falling under WP:NEWSORGINDIA, have been introduced into this page by you. These sources are not reliable and should not be used. In addition, can you advise where you obtain the access dates from in these edits? CNMall41 (talk) 05:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove this because it is an reliable sources which i added on Shemaroo Entertainment TV channels session because it is important to add these sources because it is too old and i had a right to add these reliable sources as you think it is an unreliable sources no way. I had been researched and learned this from google and that is way i added these sources. 121Fam (talk) 05:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't Google. This is Wikipedia. You were provided the link to WP:NEWSORGINDIA (this would be the third time). Do as you wish, but next time you introduce such sources you will be reported for such. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also did not answer the question about the access dates.--CNMall41 (talk) 05:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These accessdates were found at the source page 121Fam (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point to this source page you refer to? Also, note the above warning. It is up to you to get consensus should you want to use sources that are deemed unreliable. You will need to use the talk page per WP:ONUS but if you revert again you will be reported. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting on a response. Based on your editing, it appears you may be using multiple accounts as well. Can you disclose any accounts you have previously used (or are currently using) on Wikipedia? --CNMall41 (talk) 18:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:CNMall41 kindly i am sorry to you to refusing to answer your questions because i am going to revealing the truth that these are not source pages but it is actually an source website article page inside this source article website page you will find its publication dates of an article as this publication date is used as its accessdates now finally you will know the answer i am giving you the sample of its source website article page and you will finally find its publication date with its aricle name.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/ekta-tiwari-on-playing-the-antagonist-for-the-first-time-in-gudiya-rani-negative-roles-can-be-very-colourful-and-expressive/amp_articleshow/112201857.cms 121Fam (talk) 14:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is a language barrier as I do not fully understand. Are you saying you used publication dates for access dates?--CNMall41 (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am using those Publications date as for its accessdates 121Fam (talk) 01:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing for Draft:Gudiya Rani which I see has access dates from well before you created it. At this point I am going to assume you do not wish to respond which is unfortunate. It is also full of unreliable sources which you were previously warned about. If you do not wish to engage in discussion I will need to report it should the draft be moved to mainspace with the unreliable sourcing. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nath (TV series) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Do NOT add subheadings to the plots. It can be stated in prose. There is a previous discussion on another page which supports their removal. CNMall41 (talk) 18:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flowers TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patient Zero. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gudiya Rani

Hello 121Fam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gudiya Rani for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Gudiya Rani to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

jlwoodwa (talk) 15:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gudiya Rani moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gudiya Rani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Looks like my talk page message to you crossed. This is full of unreliable sources, including NEWSORGINDIA and publications such as Tellychakkar which is on the list of unreliable sources at the Indian Film Taskforce. Moving to draft as an ATD. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 06:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ruposhi Bangla (TV channel), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sun Bangla, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I removed this due to the WP:FAKEREF you used. No where does it say the show is shown on Sun Bangla. CNMall41 (talk) 19:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sun Neo

Hello 121Fam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sun Neo for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Sun Neo to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

C F A 💬 16:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh Hai Chahatein

Please comply with Wikipedia's plot length guidelines: MOS:TVPLOT Jellysandwich0 (talk) 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gudiya Rani (TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gudiya Rani (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because As with many of your creations, I find it full of unreliable sources that fall under NEWSORGINDIA. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 05:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

You were asked in this thread above about access dates on pages you created. I see this happening a lot with your editing which raises suspicion that you have a conflict of interest. The fact you failed to answer (after three requests) about the access dates, tells me that it is highly likely that a COI exists. Prior to taking this and your editing pattern to WP:COIN, I am hoping to get a response from you. Not sure what else to do at this point since you have ignored the requests despite continuing to edit. CNMall41 (talk) 05:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 18:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chhathi Maiyya Ki Bitiya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chhathi Maiyya Ki Bitiya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gudiya-Rani.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gudiya-Rani.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 19:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not responding to multiple concerns about your editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 20:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a collaborative project, you cannot simply ignore other editors' concerns. You've been asked several times on this page, and at WP:COIN. It's time to answer. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I Didn't answer those questions to the User:CNMall41 about the accessdates. I had been silent for this because i refuses to tell the reason behind of adding references in every wikipedia articles. I officially telling the truth behind of adding the articles with References. Yes, These reference dates have been found in every website pages on the under of the headline from the google website and these website references is only used to proving how much is notability towards on this. I know how to add them because these are the old references but the User:CNMall41 removes them and he questions about this accessdates. I answered some questions to him but he questioned but i didn't so i refuses to answer him and that is why i couldn't reveal those answers to you. 121Fam (talk) 06:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little confused; you seem to be saying that you do not plan to answer the question? If you refuse to answer the question, then you'll remain blocked. As I said, this is a collaborative project, you can't keep editing if you're going to ignore others. Floquenbeam (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know your words because I know I am doing this to not destroy the Wikipedia community and I always listens to Wikipedia Privacy policy Terms and Conditions. I had a right add References to every articles hence please unlock my userpage. 121Fam (talk) 13:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enter this online website article page which I created the article of Draft:Gudiya Rani (TV series) inside this online website article page you will find its article name and its publication date as these publication dates are used as accessdates.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/ekta-tiwari-on-playing-the-antagonist-for-the-first-time-in-gudiya-rani-negative-roles-can-be-very-colourful-and-expressive/amp_articleshow/112201857.cms 121Fam (talk) 14:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in my reply in the above thread (please keep relies here for admins reviewing your block), are you saying you are using publication dates for access dates? If you can clarify that then I have another question for you about another account on Wikipedia. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am using those Publication dates as its accessdates because it is rely to add them as your another question about another account. I don't have any another accounts. 121Fam (talk) 01:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. What is your relationship to User:P.Karthik.95? Is this an alternative account that you are using?--CNMall41 (talk) 01:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't have any relationship to this user and this is not an alternative account that I am using. 121Fam (talk) 02:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock my account 121Fam (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want your account unblocked, then you have to submit an unblock request using the code mentioned in the block notice above. Otherwise it will not be put in the queue and admins will never be alerted to it. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024 unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

121Fam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had finally revealed the whole truth to the User:CNMall41 why I refused to answer him for the accessdates which I used to edits in every articles as I am using the publication date as its accessdates and finally revealed the whole truth to him and I am appealing my unblock request to unblock my account and I promises to them that I will listen to Wikipedia Privacy policy Terms and Conditions as I had right to edit articles as my request please unlock my account as I apologize to every wikipedia users for not responding to them.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, this does not adequately address prior raised concerns nor does it demonstrate that you are generally capable of engaging with them. I would recommend reading through the many notices that were left on this page before you were first blocked, and studying the criticisms that they have raised of your editing, in order to be able to understand what you are expected to do better. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

121Fam (talk) 00:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. I did not see your response until now. The reason I am asking your connection is because you exhibit the same editing style as that user, including the use of publication dates for access dates. You also created your account five days after P.Karthik.95 was reported as a SOCK. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 No, I tell you that I don't have any connection between the User:P.Karthik.95 as I am not the same sock user who is using this account as I still telling you repeatedly I am not the sock user P.Karthik.95 i am not lying that is true as I created this account after 6 Months. 121Fam (talk) 08:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Every users had also doing this by putting publication dates for its accessdates expect this user P.Karthik.95 had did this as this is my only one account and i don't have any connection of this user. I am telling you again I don't have any connection of this user and that is true as I am not lying as please unlock my account. 121Fam (talk) 14:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Posting a "retirement" message and then creating a new account Special:Contributions/Retro6788 to evade the block is called sockpuppetry and is a really good way to make sure you don't get unblocked anytime soon. Don't keep doing this. Ravensfire (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/121Fam. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Manoranjan-Prime.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Manoranjan-Prime.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]