User talk:ইউনুছ মিঞা

This is ইউনুছ মিঞা's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, YounusMia2003, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L

Placename changes and Wikipedia policy

Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bangladesh/Archive 7#Placename changes and Wikipedia policy to understand why Wikipedia uses the spelling it does. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions

There are multiple ways of transliterating Bengali. When Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (such as WP:COMMONNAME) are insufficient to determine which spelling to use for a geographic place (for example because some place are so rarely mentioned in English-language sources) there is a project-level naming convention, WP:BDPLACE that guides us. That's why Wikipedia uses the spelling Mirsharai Upazila. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hi YounusMia2003! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Mirsharai Upazila several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Mirsharai Upazila, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, YounusMia2003,

You were not just edit-warring on this article but on many others. If an editor reverts an edit or move you made, you should either go discuss it on the article talk page or go to the editor's User talk page to ask about it. Edit-warring is one of the most common reasons why editors get blocked and lose their editing privileges. WP:BRD stands for "Bold-Revert-Discuss" not "Bold-Revert-Revert-Revert-Revert-Get blocked". It's in your best interest to start communicating with your fellow editors when disagreements happen. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ইউনুছ মিঞা,

If you keep edit-warring over these page moves, you will receive a block and loss of editing privileges. It's like you haven't been listening to any of these messages. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! YounusMia2003, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ইউনুছ মিঞা,

I said I would block you if you continued to move-war and you persisted so you are now blocked. You have to learn how to communicate with your fellow editors instead of just doing whatever you want. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ইউনুছ মিঞা (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdullah Alswaha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minister.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah, you may be blocked from editing. Belbury (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing maintenance templates

I don't know how fluent you are in the English language, but if someone has put a {{copyedit}} template on an article that you've written yourself, you likely aren't the best person to judge when to remove it.

The presence of the template on the article adds it to Category:Wikipedia articles needing copy edit which will notify other editors of the need for copyediting. Belbury (talk) 08:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah. Belbury (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey brother, what's your problem? ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 17:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. It's about you removing the "grammar" and "orphan" maintenance templates when the article still has some grammar issues, and is very much orphaned. Belbury (talk) 07:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lutfar Rahman (muslim scholar) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lutfar Rahman (muslim scholar) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lutfar Rahman (muslim scholar) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 13:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury There are enough references to verify the article. ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 14:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah if you have a point to make, rather than trying to hide the discussion. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 14:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Farukia Madinatul Ulum Madrasah. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Lutfar Rahman (muslim scholar), you may be blocked from editing. Belbury (talk) 14:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury ? ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 19:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 ? ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 @Belbury @Yamla unblock please. ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 15:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't ping me again. WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. If you lack the ability to communicate in English, I suggest sticking to your own native language version of the project. --Yamla (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an admin, I cannot approve or reject unblock requests. --Belbury (talk) 15:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury brother please unblock. ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 07:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I cannot unblock you. I'm putting you on mute now. Belbury (talk) 08:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury why? ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 08:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury How can I get unblocked? ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 08:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ইউনুছ মিঞা (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock, I won't edit the destruction trend later.

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ইউনুছ মিঞা (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock and give me a chance to contribute to the English Wikipedia. ইউনুছ মিঞা (talk) 15:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to tell us what was wrong with your edits, what you will do differently, and what edits you intend to make if unblocked. I too urge you, if English is not your primary language, to use the Wikipedia of your primary language instead. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not the premier Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 16:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Tanvir Hossain Topu

Hello, ইউনুছ মিঞা. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tanvir Hossain Topu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tanvir Hossain Topu

Hello, ইউনুছ মিঞা. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tanvir Hossain Topu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]