User talk:طاها صایم

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of nishapur (1200)

Hello, طاها صایم. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of nishapur (1200), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghurid conquest of Khorasan (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ghurid conquest of Khorasan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, طاها صایم! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello mr kulie tastic i wonder why my topic was not accpected, i have written a topic about conquest of khorasan by ghurids because there was not a topic about that which is so important for those who wants to know about ghurids conquests as i see i have written every words by sources and i have mentioned them. طاها صایم (talk) 12:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). You have a single reference which is not enough to show notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 12:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK i understand, I can add more sourecs, but i do not know how many sourecs are enough may i know if add more sourecs my topic would be published? طاها صایم (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no fixed amount of sources or a guarantee of being accepted other than as set out by the guideline Wikipedia:Notability. The section Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline is the expanded version of my sentence above. A lot of people say 3 sources is enough, but it depends on the quality of the source and how much information they have in them. If you can find 3+ sources (in total including your existing one) that are more than passing mentions then add them and resubmit. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello sir i hope you be well, sir i added more sourecs and as i said before ghurid campaign in khorasan is so imortant, ghurid campaign in india is available in Wikipedia but ghurid campiagn in khorasan isn't available while it is part of ghurid empire history, that is the reson why i have written this topic, at the end may i ask you will be my topic published in Wikipedia or not. طاها صایم (talk) 08:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there are currently a lot of drafts waiting for review see Category:Pending AfC submissions. They are not reviewed in any particular order, some reviewers check new submissions, some the oldest, some at random and others work on topic areas. Unfortunately there are not enough volunteer reviewers to keep the backlog and wait times as short as we should like. I can see you have added a number of new sources and resubmitted so it will be reviewed at some point, it's just a case of waiting. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 08:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you a lot sir طاها صایم (talk) 08:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Balkh (1198) (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Balkh (1198) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 14:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Balkh (1198) (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Balkh (1198) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello طاها صایم! Your additions to Draft:Battle of Balkh (1198) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghurid conquest of Khorasan (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

At present, several in-text citations are listed after the references, making it unclear if the information from those sources has been used to create the article or if they are provided for additional information. The in-text citations need to be placed throughout the article to verify the relevant information. Any sources provided for additional information should be listed in the external links.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ghurid conquest of Khorasan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Termez (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Siege of Termez may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 10:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how can i remove the copyright? this toipc is related to history so i have to copy the texts of the book that i use it as a source and write it down here . is it copyright? طاها صایم (talk) 10:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for asking about this. You are right about the need to use reliable sources, such as the book you used for this article. But sources should be used to confirm (or verify) the facts we include in Wikipedia articles, not to provide the exact words. Copying the text straight from a source is plagiarism, and it is also a copyright violation except for some rare cases where a text is not protected by copyright. What we as editors have to do is summarise the facts and information from the sources in our own words. That can be difficult, for native English speakers as well as for people like myself who speak English as a second or foreign language, but it's important to stick to this principle. You might find this guide useful.

I hope this makes sense! Kind regards, --bonadea contributions talk 10:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

could you check it now sir? i I corrected طاها صایم (talk) 12:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]