User talk:Leszek Jańczuk: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 11:14, 21 June 2010

Im a retarded twat!!!

I have no nipplwes

And i'm a bit gay

im a pedo

The reading with της, read by f1 and (presumably) Greek witnesses lying behind several early versions, is the easiest and seems to have arisen from an accidental omission of αυτης.

A majority of the Committee decided, somewhat reluctantly, that the reading with αυτου, despite the historical and contextual difficulties, must be adopted on the strength of its external attestation.

So the UBS editors suggest that the dancing girl is denoted by Mark (accordng to the Alexandrain text) as being alled "Herodias" (entirely possible if she is Herod's own daughter), and hence distinct from the historical Salome. The version in Alexandrinus is dismissed as clumsy Greek (which it is); but to my mind that would argue in favour of its being the original - on standard text critical principles. If the text της θυγατρος αυτου Ηρωδιαδος were the original, then a (supposed 4th century) Byzantine redactor would surely have tended to assimilate the text to that in Matthew; not create a semi-Aramiac phrase. And then where do the pre-4th century versions get their source text from, since they are not a likely rendering of the Alexandrian?

I suspect that if the Textus Receptus defenders had not made so much of a noise about this reading, the UBS committte would have ditched Westcott/Hort on this verse, and quietly re-asserted the text as in Alexandrinus. TomHennell (talk) 15:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Textual criticism

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Textual criticism/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films July 2009 Newsletter

The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Vaticanus

Bonjour,

Please, read this.

Budelberger ( ) 13:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Codex Romanus

Hi. I can see that you have changed the redirection in "Codex Romanus" from "Codex Vaticanus" into "Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209". Could you please consider reverting this change? "Codex Romanus" is a generic term, in the real world it cannot refer to just one codex. It is used by editors alternatively to "Codex Vaticanus" (this is why the redir was to this one), f.e. the Catullus codex I added to the list, Codex Vaticanus Ottobonianus Latinus 1829 is among Catullus' editors commonly known as "Codex Romanus", or "R".

It is understandable that people who are editing a particular book, refer in such terms to their manuscripts, but from the point of view of the public, one cannot claim such generic terms as "Vaticanus" or "Romanus" (or "Parisinus" or "Oxoniensis" or "Laurentianus" or "Ambrosianus" etc. for that matter) as being specific enough to mean a particular MS. Mamurra (talk) 08:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leszek; I have reverted this particular redirection to its original form. It will be for editors concerned with Catullus and Vergil (and Tertullian, Herodotus, etc) to sort out the disambiguation of "Codex Romanus", But the term is no longer - to my knowledge - used of B(03). TomHennell (talk) 10:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Vaticanus GA1

Do you have any estimate of when I should continue reviewing the article for GA status? Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 20:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leszek Jańczuk, I'm trying to understand:

"It lacks the Apocalypse. In the 19th century some scholars suggested that possibly Vaticanus 2066 (contains only text of Apocalypse), can have text close to the Vaticanus 1209. It was written in the 5th century, itas text representative of the Alexandrian text-type, both codeces are written in three columns.[30]"

The first bit is- Codex Vaticanus does not contain the Apocalypse.

The next bit is- In the 19th century some scholars suggested that possibly Vaticanus 2066 (it contains only the text of the Apocalypse) ..... Not sure about this .....

The last bit is presumably saying - Vaticanus 2066 was written in the 5th century, and it's text is representative of the Alexandrian text-type. Both codeces are written in three columns.[30]. Pyrotec (talk) 16:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILM September Election Voting

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter

The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Byzantine text-type

Hello, Leszek Jańczuk. You have new messages at Newman Luke's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WH theory

The inter-relationship between significant ancient manuscripts

This diagrammen was constracted on the basis of the Encyclopedia Biblica, vol. IV (1903). It looks like Westcott-Hort theory but perhaps not in every detail. The interrelationship between Peshitta and Coptic versions... Origen and Western text... A something strange. I think it is not stricte WH point of view. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this Leszek; and I agree with your reservations against using this diagram as a representation of the W-H theory - more perhaps an attempt to modify W-H to take into account criticisms (by Scrivener for example), and to accommodate earlier theories which tended to regqard the Syriac as a source for other versions. Oddest is the characterisation of C as Antiochene, where Hort (I think) regarded C as primarily 'Alexandrian', since Hort's 'Alexandrian' is clearly distinguished from 'Neutral' B. Moreover C (which is 5th century) cannot be a source for the Peshitta (late 4th century). In general, I cannot see that the diagram has a current value. TomHennell (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

German Wikipedia Codex Sangallensis REDIRECT

Hi Leszek, as I am planning to write an article about the Evangelium Longum (i.e. Cod. Sang. 53) I noticed the REDIRECT from w:de:Codex Sangallensis to w:de:Codex Sangallensis 48. I edited the linking articles to let them point directly to the intended article because there is more than one Codex in the San Gallian collection of Codices. I am working on a substitution for the REDIRECT with a list of all the german Codex Sangallensis articles. I hope this is OK with you. Since I am not visiting the english Wikipedia on a regular basis I would ask you to answer on my german discussion page w:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:DiethartK instead.

--DiethartK (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch windmills

Hello Leszek, I noticed that you have created some articles on the windmills in the Zaanse Schans. You may be interested to know that there is a WikiProject covering windmills - WP:MILLS. If you wish to join simply add your name to the list of members. There is a List of windmills in Poland which needs some attention to the location of various mills. Can you help pin down the exact locations of thos marked with "disambiguation needed"? Mjroots (talk) 07:22, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS October Newsletter

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Polish windmills

Many thanks for your work on the list. I've removed the entries from the Windmill World site which were not traceable. Hopefully the list is a lot more accurate now, although it probably could be further expanded. Mjroots (talk) 06:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, just checked the link you posted. Just to make sure I get it correct, "Miejscowość" is the location, "holender murowany" is a tower mill, "koźlak" is a post mill, "holender drewniany" is a smock mill. I've no idea what "nieznany" means though. "Stan" is condition? Ruina I understand but not the others. It looks like the list can be split by Vovoidship, with the eight that have more than 20 mills being split off into separate lists over time. Great detective work in finding that list! Mjroots (talk) 07:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've copied the list to my sandbox and re-arranged the current entries by Voivodeship. There are three that need sorting still. I think Czermin is probably Czerwin but will await confirmation on that. I'm not sure if Trzęsówka-Kłodzin is the same as Trzęsówka, or is there a village called Kłodzin near Trzęsówka? No entry for Sub-Carpathian Voivodeship though. If they can't be pinned down they should be deleted. Mjroots (talk) 08:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call

The project's Tag & Assess drive has begun. We will be assessing over 50,000 articles during the drive and we need your help! 200-article ranges can be adopted and completed at any pace. A variety of awards are available based on the number of articles assessed. Please help review whatever you are comfortable with, and if you have any questions, leave a message on the talk page of the drive. In addition, please add your name to the active member list if you have not already. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of New Testament Latin manuscripts

Hello, Leszek,

I see that you've been doing great work in NT Latin manuscripts. Very impressive!

I've re-edited the intro to List of New Testament Latin manuscripts because some things there seemed unclear. I hope the changes are fine with you. All the best, --Dyuku (talk) 23:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manuscritos do Novo Testamento e a pt.wikipedia

Como já viste, estou a criar os artigos dos papiros do NT (como esboços de 1 ou 2 linhas, mas criando). E depois desses, sobram ainda os uncias, os lecionários e os minúsculos. Ou seja, eu ainda tenho muito trabalho pela frente. E estava a pensar: Já que os criaste aqui, não queres me ajudar a criar por lá? Boas contribuições, Béria Lima ^Msg 22:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS.: Escrevi em Português assumindo que, por contribuir na pt.wikipedia, você consegue ler neste idioma.

Book of Revelations

I see you are a respectable poster on this site. I respect that you love this site so much but why should your liberal theology be able to delete my conservative theology in which I have sources to? You aren't supposed to be bias and I don't go around deleting your liberal stuff. So let both sides be heard. Thank you my friend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkorichard (talk • contribs) 10:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Caesarean text-type

Thanks for your note. I just looked over the article and like what you've been doing with it. I agree that there is something at least hypothetically there, but not enough to do much with. I had to ignore it as a text-form when I did my New Testament, although I did have a number of the individual readings included -- but my New Testament was more for advanced laymen and pastors than Greek scholars.SkyWriter (Tim) (talk) 04:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Moon (2009 film) and Eclipse (2010 film)

Both these two articles were recently submitted for a name change. I did agree with this name change in February, however, now I am a strong opposing factor in why the name should ramian New Moon and Eclipse with the signifigant other name in the first line of the articles.

WP:NCCN and WP:PRECISION both state the title should be "terms most commonly used", "A good article title is brief and to the point", "Prefer titles that follow the same pattern as those of other similar articles", "An article can only have one name; however significant alternative names for the topic should be mentioned in the article, usually in the first sentence or paragraph". "And despite earlier reports that the movie would be known as The Twilight Saga's New Moon, the title will remain New Moon according to the movie's rep. They just have Twilight Saga in the artwork to identify it for anyone less devoted than your average fanggirl."Source.

Also see WP:PRECISION. I quote from there: "Articles' titles usually merely indicate the name of the topic. When additional precision is necessary to distinguish an article from other uses of the topic name, over-precision should be avoided. Be precise but only as precise as is needed. For example, it would be inappropriate to name an article "United States Apollo program (1961–1975)" over Apollo program or "Nirvana (Aberdeen, Washington rock band)" over Nirvana (band). Remember that concise titles are generally preferred."

However, I personally do not think we have had enough input and would like input from people who might not like these movies, or just edit them to help wikipedia out. The pages are: Talk:New Moon (2009 film)#Requested move and Talk:Eclipse (2010 film)#Requested move. Any help/input would greatly be apriciated. I am not stressing weather you should oppose/support either of these.ChaosMaster16 (talk) 21:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)ChaosMaster16[reply]

Re: DYK hook

Hi there, I noted some problems with your dyk hook at DYK for Peter P. Dubrovsky. The article needs copy editing (for English usage). Also, I am not clear about the relationship of the manuscripts to the French Revolution. Can you clarify? Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 20:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peter P. Dubrovsky

On January 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peter P. Dubrovsky, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 536

On January 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 536, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar, and a suggestion

		The Original Barnstar
		For your excellent articles on Papyri, Minuscules, etc. Just great work! bender235 (talk) 12:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're adding Ancient Greek words (or other languages) to articles, please include them with {{Lang}}, like I demonstrated here. This has several advantages, especially for automatic screen readers. --bender235 (talk) 12:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transcription of Early Greek NT Manuscripts

Being informed by yours truly that you used Philip W. Comfort and David P. Barrett's The Text of the Earliest New Testament Greek Manuscripts to do a transcription of ${\mathfrak {P}}$ ⁵, are you planing on doing transcriptions for the rest of Early Papyri? If so, I'd be more than willing to give a hand if this is your intention :) (Stephen Walch (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I can quite easily do some of the smaller ones that haven't been done quite quickly. But you're right - quite a daunting task being able to put the transcriptions into Wikipedia form (Stephen Walch (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Qubbat ul-Khazna

Kubbet el Chazne (Arabic: قبة الخزنة Qubbat ul-Khazna) is an old structure [1]. It is translated into English as the "Dome of the Treasury" and is located inside the courtyard of the Umayyad Mosque. You may take a look at this structure here: [2]. DrMoslehi (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 541

On January 22, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 541, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 545

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 545 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cryptic C62 · Talk 06:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 543 (Gregory-Aland)

On January 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 543 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 06:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

question about your dyk hook

Hi, I have asked a question about your dyk hook here. I do not understand what it means. Could you help me out? Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 20:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a alt hook suggestion at the above location. What do you think? Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 21:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request

I went to edit the article, but I guess you are working on it. Would appreciate your not requesting a copy edit until you are out. LilHelpa (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 544

On January 30, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 544, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 545

On January 31, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 545, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Limits of the Five Patriarchates

Hello Leszek. I have reviewed your latest submission at DYK and there are some issues that may need addressing. Kindly Calmer Waters 09:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Limits of the Five Patriarchates

It would be very good if you could add the critical apparatus to the Greek Wikisource, where it is available to non-English readers. Andreas ^(T) 13:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of New Testament uncials/archive1

Can you reply to the comments on the FLC page so reviewers know what has and has not been completed? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Christ's Agony at Gethsemane

Hello! Your submission of Christ's Agony at Gethsemane at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! otherl left 19:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 569 (Gregory-Aland)

On February 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 569 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Daniel Gotthilf Moldenhawer

On February 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Daniel Gotthilf Moldenhawer, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request

Had a quick look and have to run. Please check the introduction. Did you mean to say he worked on several palimsests' texts or one palimsest's text? -- LilHelpa (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: DYK

In response to this conversation: I'm not quite sure I understand. How should I change the nomination? I have just changed my comment to report the number of characters, rather than words, by which the article was expanded. Is that what you mean? Alekjds ^talk 18:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your dyk hook for A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament

Hi, your dyk hook for A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament is not a 5x expansion. Please see here for an explanation. It needs over 3000 more characters to qualify. Thanks, —mattisse (Talk) 20:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re edit count for article

See my talk page. Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 02:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(from my talk page) I have found that bot to be unreliable in picking up articles. So I would not depend on it if I were you. —mattisse (Talk) 02:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Christ's Agony at Gethsemane

On February 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christ's Agony at Gethsemane, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

dyk hook problem

Hi, there is a problem with your dyk hook here. The hook in the article needs an inline citation after it. Thanks, —mattisse (Talk) 18:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Codex Carolinus

Hello Leszek, I have reviewed your recent submission at DYK... and have some questions regarding it before promotion. Thanks in advance. Kindly Calmer Waters 08:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both nominations are well sourced; however, it appears just the hook facts are currently uncited for Codex Carolinus and Minuscule 614. If these facts can be cited, I see no reason for promotion to the main page. Thank you again for your diligence and outstanding article creations. Kindly Calmer Waters 17:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kubbet el Chazne

I am not exactly sure what Kubbet el Chazne is? I am fairly certain that it is not the National Museum of Damascus, which is called Mathaf el WaTany bieldamasq.

I can tell you that the word Kubbet (قبة) which is better transliterized with a Q (Qubba[t]) is usually used to refer to the dome of building, particularly the Islamic architecture of mosques. So Qubbet el Chazne most likely refers to some mosque somewhere, or at least its dome. But I'm not sure what the name Chazne here refers to.

Hope that helps.

codectified (talk) 21:47, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Franz Anton Knittel

On February 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Franz Anton Knittel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 614

On February 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 614, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 629

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 629 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Arctic Night 14:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Verlorene Siege

Hi Leszek, I've looked at your article on Verlorene Siege and would suggest that you give references to some of your claims: ie "Colonel-General von Rundstedt - brilliant exponent of grand tactics, a talented soldier who grasped the essentials of any problem in an instant." Is this Manstein's judgement or your own? Much of what you say doesn't make sense in English: "the German general staff had some concerns with Adolf Hitler. Hitler, despite the lack of education and preparation of military forces as a supervisor reached unprecedented success"; "End of the war looked from his property." Ericoides (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Colonel-General von Rundstedt - brilliant exponent of grand tactics, a talented soldier who grasped the essentials of any problem in an instant." Is this Manstein's judgement not mine?" I have no idea; you tell me. That is one of the problems of the article; the reader can't distinguish between quotes from Manstein and your own POV. Ericoides (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I've put the quotation back into the article with quote marks; please would you use quote marks so that we can see which bits are being quoted and which bits are your own opinion. If you look at this diff you will see that the Manstein claim looked like your own.[3]. Was this a quote too: "He was a type of old-guard, man from a past." I can't believe it could be from an English translation as it is very badly written English and makes no sense. Was it your own translation from the German? It's all very confusing. Ericoides (talk) 10:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. The confusion in the article comes from your level of English. Eg what does this mean: "The global analysis, thin vision of " the moments of true » in battles, the consecutive description of optimum plans and not optimum actions — all this makes the book of Manstein as a handbook of strategy." It doesn't make sense. Ericoides (talk) 11:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fulcran Vigouroux

On February 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fulcran Vigouroux, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 627

On March 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 627, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 644

On March 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 644, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 06:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 546

On March 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 546, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 19:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Verlorene Siege

On March 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Verlorene Siege, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Biblioteca comunale Luciano Benincasa

On March 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Biblioteca comunale Luciano Benincasa, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Minuscule 629

On March 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 629, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Congratulations

Thanks and congrats for adding all the miniscule manuscript articles. it's a truly invaluable and absolutely historic service both to Wikipedia, the theological and biblical community, and to the knowledge base of humankind. i mean it! i'm a theology and biblical studies enthusiast. --Dpr (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minuscule 642

I have left a question at Did you know about some wording in the hook for Minuscule 642. The article states that he brought the hooks over; however, the hook states that he purchased them but this is not yet in the article. I am sure he did both, but if you can add this to the article (as it is offline sourced), I can go ahead and approve it. I also left a note at the nomination, because I often show up at your submission with what seems like ....we'll I still need this or that :) Also disregard the English orientalist portion I discussed as I was mistaken. We'll take care, and keep up the good work :) Calmer Waters 08:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Birch

I'm trying to copy edit the article on Andrew Birch but I'm not sure what this sentence means: "The young Danish scholar left the church in the state capital quite a few friends who almost surely belonged to the circle of Roman Catholics, who busied himself with patriotic and archaeological studies." Moglbys to napisac tu (albo na moim talku) po Polsku?radek (talk) 08:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 642

On March 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 642, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Lectionary 187

On March 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 187, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

25 DYK Creation/Expansion Medal

		The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Congratulations for reaching the milestone of 25 of your created articles appearing at Did you know. The variety of your contributions, including the articles on palaeography topics, are a great asset to the encyclopedia. Well done! Binksternet (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of British Library, Add. 14448

Hello! Your submission of British Library, Add. 14448 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk) 23:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Codex Arundel

Hello! Your submission of Codex Arundel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Andrew Birch

On March 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Andrew Birch, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for British Library, Add. 14448

On March 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British Library, Add. 14448, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Arundel Codex, etc

Please pay more attention to your categories. Also "Arundel Codex" is often seen, & should be a redirect. MS are not "currently housed in" etc, they are just "in". This information should be in the lead, regardless of the infobox. "Additional" etc should be spelt out in text, and "MS" included. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Arundel

On March 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Codex Arundel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 658, Minuscule 659, Minuscule 661

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 658, Minuscule 659, Minuscule 661 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 13:16, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Example

On March 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Example, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 08:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 655

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 655 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ThaddeusB (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Novum Instrumentum omne

Hi Leszek Jańczuk, can you clarify "In 1512 he had been in negotiation with Badius Ascensius of Paris to publish Vulgate of Jerome and a new edition of Adagia. It did happen, and Erasmus did not continue contacts with Badius.[1]". Thanks. Pyrotec (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The main body of the article is OK, but the WP:Lead needs some expansion to summarise the main points in the article. I've slightly expanded the Lead; if you could finish it off, I will award GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 09:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Archangel Gospel

Hello! Your submission of Archangel Gospel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Erasmus

I've just noticed that you have been editing the Novum Instrumentum article. This is fascinating, as I am a fan of Erasmus's Encomium Mories, and I have a personal (unproven) suspicion that he and Thomas More's daughter cooked up the letters of Heloise and Abelard between them. I believe that only Erasmus's great mind could have written the Abelard letters. I would be interested to know whether you have come across any other theories on the origin of the letters. But please don't do any research to answer this - I'm just interested to know what you think. Please reply on my talk page if you have any comment.--Storye book (talk) 17:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Countenance divine

I have opened an AfD for Countenance divine at WP:Articles for deletion/Countenance divine if you are interested. Tb (talk) 01:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Archangel Gospel

On April 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Archangel Gospel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Kodeks Aleksandryjski na polskich Wikiźródłach

Cześć! Na polskich Wikiźródłach opracowujemy właśnie Encyklopedję kościelną z 1873 r. Tak się składa, że pierwszym hasłem w tej encyklopedii jest "A", czyli Kodeks Aleksandryjski. Niestety, mamy problem w jego przepisywaniu - mianowicie, tekst encyklopedii zawiera kilka liter greckich. Nikt w projekcie nie zna greki, litery są nieco niewyraźne, a na dodatek nie ma ich w alfabecie greckim (znaczy, że to jakaś starsza forma), i nie bardzo potrafimy je przepisać. Jeżeli chodzi o Kodeks Aleksandryjski i ogólnie manuskrypty, jesteś bez wątpienia najlepiej zorientowaną osobą na Wikipedii, i jeżeli tylko miałbyś chwilę czasu, bylibyśmy bardzo wdzięczni za udzielenie pomocy. Strona z hasłem znajduje się tutaj - s:pl:Strona:PL Nowodworski-Encyklopedia koscielna T.1 016.jpeg. Serdecznie pozdrawiam --Teukros (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dura Parchment 24

The article Dura Parchment 24 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dura Parchment 24 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for National Library of Russia, Codex Syriac 1

On April 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Library of Russia, Codex Syriac 1, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament

Hi Leszek Jańczuk, I have left comments on Talk:A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament/GA1. Pyrotec (talk) 16:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

jakew

regarding the edit war i have with jakew

i posted an message on his talk page in which i explained why i made my edits and asked him to explain why eh keeps changing my work he has deleted it and replaced it with the following comment

Thank you. It's very thoughtful of you to let me know. Jakew (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

i posted a comment on jakew talk page explaining why i changed his edits and asked him why he changed mine he replied with this

Thank you. It's very thoughtful of you to let me know. Jakew (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

this response does not give any insight into why he keeps changing my work

i believe that he is maliciously changing my work

circumsison is a matter over which many people have strong fealings. in the past wars have been fought over it and many people still do it regardless of what the law may say. for this reason i suspect that jakew may be sabotaging my work because he has strong personal fealings about the matter

jakew has posted a lot of articles, however due to the extreame fealings some people have regarding circumsision is suspect that he may be chanlengeing my edits which mostly opose circumsision because h has stong fealings about it himself.--82.24.163.100 (talk) 22:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Otto Thott

Hello! Your submission of Otto Thott at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jujutacular ^T · C 21:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Euthalian Apparatus

On April 20, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Euthalian Apparatus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Codex Marchalianus

On April 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Codex Marchalianus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus

On April 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Minuscule 671

On April 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 671, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Otto Thott

On April 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Otto Thott, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Lectionary 216

On April 29, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 216, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Samuel Thomas Bloomfield

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Samuel Thomas Bloomfield, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://chestofbooks.com/reference/American-Cyclopaedia-14/Samuel-Thomas-Bloomfield-Samuel-Whitbread.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, if the page that was tagged merely repeats verbatim the information from American Cyclopedia (which appears to be the case), you can stick with the original wording if you'd rather since anything pre 1923 is public domain. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lectionary 220, Lectionary 223

Hello! Your submission of Lectionary 220, Lectionary 223 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Sorry for bringing this up so late. Espresso Addict (talk) 08:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 686

Glad to see another of your wonderful Minuscule articles, but with this one I'm wondering if we can get a more mainstream-accessible hook? I had no idea what "so called Jerusalem Colophon" meant, and neither Minuscule 686 nor Jerusalem Colophon were particularly enlightening. Can we get a hook that might be more readable to a casual main-page browser? If you add one, feel free to let me know on my talk page and I'll revisit the nomination. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lectionary 226

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Lectionary 226, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Lectionary 220. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lectionary 227

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Lectionary 227, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Lectionary 220. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Oriental MS 424

On May 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Oriental MS 424, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 220

On May 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 220, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 223

On May 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 223, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 686

On May 8, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 686, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for this one, cheers Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Codex Vaticanus

Hi, I thought I'd let you know that as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010, I've copyedited Codex Vaticanus. Please check my changes for accuracy as the article is fairly technical and I wouldn't want to have changed the meaning. I found this to be an absolutely fascinating article (particularly as yesterday I finished reading a book about William Tyndale who translated from Greek to English). Should you need any more help on this article, please don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 697

On May 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 697, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for this one Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you

Thank you very much for the Copyeditor's Barnstar. That was a nice surprise! I'm not completely done, but wanted to wait for a few days before I come back to it. At this point it only needs a little more polishing. It's really an informative article, and I enjoyed working on it. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar

		The Christianity Barnstar
		I'm not sure if anyone's given you a barnstar yet for your series of articles on lectionaries and minuscules, but if not it's about time you had one. DustFormsWords (talk) 04:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 232

On May 17, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 232, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK problem

Hello! Your submission of Lectionary 226 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Little Mountain 5 00:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 228

On May 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 228, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hunterian Collection

Hello! Your submission of Hunterian Collection at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Interesting subject! I've heard of the Hunterian Collection (in the context of early books on anatomy) but never realised it included coins. However, I think you need to select a different hook, unless the "finest" is supported by an independent source. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your continued work on this. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 226

On May 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 226, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for the article Victuallers (talk) 06:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Nice work!

Just wanted to say awesome work on biblical manuscripts you have done so far! Omegastar (talk) 11:20, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 699

On May 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 699, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Minuscule 716

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Minuscule 716, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.reachinformation.com/define/Minuscule_716.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 239

On May 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 239, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 12:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Lectionary 240

On May 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 240, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 12:03, 25 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Lectionary 241

On May 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 241, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Charles de Condren

On May 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles de Condren, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hunterian Collection

On May 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hunterian Collection, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal

		The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Congratulations are in order upon the occasion of your reaching the milestone of 50 articles which you created or expanded, submitted to "Did you know?" and appearing on the Main page! Your efforts have substantially improved the encyclopedia. Well done! Binksternet (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 714

On May 30, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 714, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Minuscule 715

On May 31, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 715, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Kaiser Wilhelm Society

I am sorry I reverted your edits. It was an accident. I was trying to revert the IP's edtits, when Huggle decided it was going to be clever and revert yours as well! Again, I am sorry. :) --Mithrandir^Again (Talk!) 23:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Wow, thanks for these speedy edits! Regards! See you around. --_Sulmues^{Let's talk} 19:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, drop by if you need my help with any translation from Albanian. --_Sulmues^{Let's talk} 21:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Literary Barnstar
		I will be glad to award this barnstar for your work on the two Berat Codices work in particular (Codex_Beratinus and Beratinus 2), and in general on the hundreds of articles you have created on uncials, codices and old bibles. Actually this is kind of the wrong barnstar, because there should be a Leszek barnstar from now on. Please accept my personal recognition and admiration! Thank you! _Sulmues^{Let's talk} 17:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Codex Tischendorfianus III

Hello! Your submission of Codex Tischendorfianus III at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rlevse • Talk • 01:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pls archive a lot of this talk page ;-) — Rlevse • Talk • 01:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

seriously?

Philip Ojha (better known as "Father" Ojha), infamous Nepalese religious figure, founder of the Church of DotA, first apostle in the Book of Brian Peppers, coiner of the phrase "Do You Scream?" used in the popular film Batman Molests 2011. He is currently serving a life imprisonment in the Correctional Facility in Stockholm, Sweden following a sexual assault case. This is obvious vandalism.84.136.206.1 (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it is. Please take more care in reverting. –xeno^talk 22:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Borg in-Nadur

Thanks for adding that category to Borg in-Nadur apparitions. Do you know Biblical Greek ? ( I'm studying at the moment ). Alan347 (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Tischendorfianus III

On June 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Codex Tischendorfianus III, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Biblical Greek

Good morning Leszek Jańczuk, I'm continuing to study the Greek, what I'm doing is reading it out in Greek http://biblos.com/mark/1-3.htm, with the help of the interlinear translation. Hope this gets me to a new phase where I start understanding the Greek directly. For the recorded manuscripts, I can always refer to your User page. Thanks. Alan347 (talk) 08:14, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're editing at a rate of once every 3 minutes

Please stop blindly editing/reverting articles you've never read or contributed, as you did to anti-Americanism. Noloop (talk) 02:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Burki

Please read the secion on Burki before you undo. This piece is purly opinion which is in violation of Wiki Policy. Kindly undo the reveret. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2010khan (talk • contribs) 19:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bibliothèque municipale de Besançon

On June 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bibliothèque municipale de Besançon, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Nicolas Perrenot de Granvelle

On June 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nicolas Perrenot de Granvelle, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Copticus Tischendorfianus I

On June 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Codex Copticus Tischendorfianus I, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Oscar Eduardovich Lemm

On June 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Oscar Eduardovich Lemm, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Vaticanus and GA tagCurious as to why you would preemptively place the GA tag on this article, [4], when it has not been passed as a GA? -- Cirt (talk) 08:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Okay, thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 08:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]DYK for Fifty Bibles of Constantine

On June 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fifty Bibles of Constantine, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Small correction in the Codex Sinaiticus neededDear Leszek, Please take at look at the end of the second paragraph in the History of the Codex -> Scribes and corrector section. There's clearly some referencing typo, but I can't figure out what you had in mind. Many thanks for your superb work!!!--Opera Omnia (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]