User talk:Access Denied

Tip of the day...

Featured world of Wikipedia

While browsing through Wikipedia, you may have clicked on Featured content from the left menu. Featured content represents the best of Wikipedia, including articles, pictures, and other contributions that showcase excellent results of the collaborative efforts of Wikipedia. Here is the list for each of these features.

Featured content:

• Featured articles
• Featured lists
• Featured pictures
  • On Wikimedia Commons
• Featured portals
• Featured topics

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Become a Wikipedia tipster

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celia Holman Lee

Although as the debate stands there is a consensus to delete, the article was completely rewritten yesterday. I have therefore relisted it, and invite you to revisit it and consider whether you wish to change your !vote. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

RFA Nomination

I suggest that it would be a good idea to enable the edit counting tools to give other editors a better picture of you. Paul2387chat 14:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. Don't. —mono 02:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

You didn't (sigh of relief) —mono 02:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

The page was already deleted per G6 as you can see by the redlink above. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 02:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Unfortunately I learned to not accept early nominations the hard way. But I must say, when you're ready you will most likely make a great administrator. The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 02:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Thank you for your report at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention (UAA). However, your report was removed as UAA is for name policy infringements that are serious enough to warrant an immediate block. General name policy violations should first be discussed with the user on their talk page. A helpful template to do just that is {{subst:Uw-username}}. Note that a request for comment can be filed if the user disagrees that their name is against the username policy, or has continued to edit after you have expressed your concern. You may find the UAA instructions helpful, and I'd recommend reading them over prior to making future reports to UAA. Thank you. There is not much point in reporting users with no edits. And there is no point at all in reporting a user for a "possible" problem. If they actually start spamming Wikipedia I won't hesitate to block them, but several of your recent reports have been premature. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: User talk:84.13.93.28

I would suggest WP:DNFTT. An IP that made 1 edit before today and is spouting off about sockpuppetry is likely a blocked or banned user; and since they have been blocked again the "conversation" is probably best just ended. Active Banana (talk) 16:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

vandal warning

Please consider removing this final warning. Removing the category is fine since (some of) the other categories are subsets of "Given names." Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

disgusting

Your behavier is a disgrace to wikipedia. Lojze Pergl (talk) 16:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)