User talk:LeoFrank: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:18, 4 January 2011

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|LeoFrank}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

DEL - COK flight

Air India and Indian Airlines have merged quite sometime back and all flights are under one entity. Yes there are internal issues of people not willing to work together but on this site wikipedia.com, information is provided to the masses and they could not care less who is behind the scenes running the show. No matter what aircraft they use, if today the flight is under Air India code "AI" (not a code share on IC but pure 3 digit AI flight) it should be placed among Air India flights (as purely all AI coded flights today leave from the international terminal of any airport ) and if it is an Air India flight with "IC code", that can today fall under the Indian Airlines flight. Besides it's just a matter of 3-4 months as the IC code will be eliminated completely.

Secondly about aircraft. Among the A319/A320/A321 aircrafts, "Indian Airlines" or "Indian" is existing only one A320s and a couple of A319s. All A321s and almost all of the A319s have "Air India" painted on the aircraft. But these things should not matter much on an information portal. I do take your point that the aircraft that will do this route will be an Indian Airlines aircraft, but other than the name on the fuselage, nothing is "Indian Airlines", it is all Air India right from booking tickets to the logo on the paper napkins on the flight.

I hope I was able to put forward my points efficiently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SQ412 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COK Flights

Abhisekh, I am sorry as I thought you have removed the additions made by me despite of giving official verifiable evidences. I didn't knew that you happened to overlook. So I make my apologies

Meanwhile, I recommend, you should leave the editing you make in regard to Air India's Delhi Flight. This is because, I clearly understand, that the newly introducing AI 693/692 is a regular Air India flight, not operated by Indian Airlines. Air India launched 4 flights from Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai and Kochi each in evening, to easy connection to late night Delhi-New York, Chicago flights. If this flight was operated by Indian Airlines, into which AI had some code-share arrangment, then the flight number would have been 4 digits. But in this case, AI 693 is a 3 digit code, indicating, its a direct AI flight--Arunvarmaother (talk) 16:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose International Airport

Hello. This is to inform you that I have reverted your recent edit on this page. As per WP:REPEATLINK, where the links are in a table, as each row should stand on its own. Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airports) does not have any exception to this. Therefore repeating links in Airport-dest-list is fine in that circumstance. Thankyou. never stop flying (talk) 13:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If Airport destination lists in other airport pages deviate from this, then they need to be changed accordingly. never stop flying (talk) 14:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bangalore Airport CopyVio

That text absolutely was lifted right from the press release (scroll down to 19 January 1010 and click on the date to expand the release). This is a blatant copyright violation, with serious legal implications and the entire section should be removed immediately. jasepl (talk) 13:57, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I kinda rewrote the Current Scenario section and changed the section heading to Current Scenario and Expansion Plans. I hope this removes the copyvio problem. MikeLynch (talk) 10:10, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks better, but some of the recent additions clearly are straight from a presser or a promo: "The world's premier retailer" and "World leader in food service". It all seems very advert-y. jasepl (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bengaluru International Airport

Hey Abhishek, I notice that you are actively editing Bengaluru International Airport. As I have written in the talk page, I feel that the article has too many sections, and hence I see lots of [edit] boxes floating around. I tried merging many of the sections, but I couldn't really find much time to complete the job. I request you to merge the sections, or expand them, so that it doesn't look somewhat ugly. Thanks. MikeLynch (talk) 09:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chennai Airport

Hey Abhishek, regarding the article on the Chennai International Airport at Meenambakkam, I was wondering if you could clean it up, as it has a lot of issues, or so I feel. I have raised one issue on its talk page. I am a bit busy quite now, so will be grateful if you can have a look at it. Thanks. MikeLynch (talk) 13:24, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SpiceJet

Thanks for the notice, but I don't understand how that was "unconstructive". I recently created that navbox and included SpiceJet to include all of Kalanithi Maran's assets. That would require changing the template a little, that doesn't mean my inclusion of the template was "unconstructive". It was meant in good faith. EelamStyleZ (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Airports

		The Original Barnstar
		I couldn't find an aviation barnstar, but this is for your maintenance on Indian airport articles. MakingTheMark •^{Wassup doc?} 17:47, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Malleswaram

I moved the 'prominent' landmarks section to talk because I had trouble understanding it. It still needs cleanup. RJFJR (talk) 14:46, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went back and removed the ==Cosmopolitan Malleswaram== section because it does sound like an essay (and it's unsourced). RJFJR (talk) 14:48, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For airport work

		The India Star
		For your tireless work in maintaining the Indian Airport articles.--Sodabottle (talk) 17:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!! :) Abhishek191288 (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Air India edit notice

I've corrected the typo. Mjroots (talk) 17:57, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kingfisher Airlines

Hi, I have received you message with reference to lack of citation in the data about Kingfisher Airline. May I ask what part of the edit are you referring to..? I had a couple of citation links listed while i was editing it. So, if you can please forward / highlight the extract to me, i will ensure that the update / edit is cited properly. Thanks, HIREN. Hiren punjabi (talk) 20:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kingfisher has code-share agreement with only BA and AA now, so King miles are valid only for these two airlines as well. I do not see how King miles are valid in the other airlines you mentioned. If you have any source (unlike the one you cited) like a press conference by Kingfisher or any news article from some valid on-line news agencies please provide the same. Thanks, Abhishek191288 (talk) 09:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please check yor data on the page ... the current fleet is 24 aircrafts marketshare is 13.3% chairman is kalanidhi maran i have added more usefull information like cancellations, on time performance... and what about the company slogan ? am i wrong ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parnas25 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

oky talking about the neutral point.... the article as of now looks like an advertisement, as you can see on the page itself adding these information(with links) will only make it more useful for anyone checking this page. talking about giving reference .... i changed marketshare to 13.3 % and also added the link. and talking about being against .... its actually the opposite. let me tell you ... at all times i know more about spicejet then you could.

Parnas25 (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons

Regarding your question about whether it si right to use flag icons in pages Etihad Airways destinations and List of Dragonair destinations, it is absolutely acceptable to include the f/i. Notice the latter has an FA-status. For more, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines/page content, or just drop a question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines. Warmest of wishes for the New Year :) Sp33dyphil ^(Talk) ^{(Contributions)}^{(Feed back needed @ Talk page)} 05:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fact mistaken as Vandalism

Hello, LeoFrank. You have new messages at Amol.Gaitonde's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dangerpatel

I noticed that you edit the pages he's editing. If you see any IPs around 117.198.78.0-117.198.89.255, please feel free to contact me. Elockid ^(Talk) 17:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure would do that. Abhishek191288 (talk) 17:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Tamil title to airline articles

Abhishek, Whilst I appreciate your concerns regarding editing of posts which I did, I wanted to clarify certain things. Why is it considered offensive? An Indian currency note has 15 languages printed on it. And the same shall be followed in all Govt organisations. Is there any rule that states in Wikipedia that says you must not address a heading in other languages? My point is that all those organisations should be addressed in all 15 languages(Wikipedia is not used by Hindi readers alone which I hope you know). I feel that you are "Racially and Linguistically" discriminating the minority Indian languages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saravanan87 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If your point is to address them in all the 15 languages, then add all of them. Why just Tamil as you did? I do not buy your story of trying to add titles in all 15 languages. And btw, titles are listed only in the official language of the entire region (India in this case) an organisation comes under (not considering the smaller regions within the larger one). Lastly please sign your posts by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. —Abhishek191288 (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would welcome if you would not object to adding the languages. I know only Tamil that's why I have added only that. I would also try to add other 14 languages as much as I can. Saravanan87 (talk) 17:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC) Saravanan[reply]

You just cannot add as per your wish. Per editor concensus, we only add a title in the language of the larger region a company belongs to. If you do want to make such changes have a discussion at Wikipedia talk:AIRLINES. If all the editors agree to your point, then you can make those changes, else no. Besides it will help if you provide an edit summary when you make changes. Abhishek191288 (talk) 14:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What the fuck is your problem?

I am a Maldivian and I know more about Maldivian (airline) than you. You don't own the fucking wikipedia page for that airline.

Fuck off.