User talk:SQ412

AI flight to DEL from COK

The AI flight 692/693 on DEL-COK-DEL sector is an AI flight operated using the fleet of A320 aircraft of Indian airlines. Note that AI operates only wide body aircraft which include A310, A330, Boeing 747-400 and Boeing 777 series. Though these flights do not have a code share agreement with IC, they have to be placed as AI operated by IC as the aircraft belong to IC though the aircraft may have AI's livery. Further they cannot be placed under IC as these flights have IFE fitted on every seat unlike IC's usual flights which do not have IFE fitted in their aircraft.

These flights can be placed under AI if

AI operates them using their own aircraft.

or

AI and IC have merged to become a single airline. (Right now IC is AI's subsidiary)

Abhishek191288 (talk) 04:14, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat the above said statements.

AI and IC have merged but operate as separate airlines of a parent company called NACIL and do have a code share agreement. As explained previously, the flights shown as AI operated by IC can only be written under AI only if AI and IC merge to become a single airline.

Yes these flights aren't codeshare agreements with IC, but since AI is not operating these flights using their own aircraft, they cannot be mentioned under AI even though they carry an AI code.

Even flights with livery of Indian on their aircraft, use the Air India paper napkins, but that doesn't mean you mention them under AI.

Though the two have merger into a single parent company, they still operate as separate airlines. All IC destinations will come under AI's as soon as AI and IC have merged into being a single airline (a single airline called Air India will be formed with the IATA code AI and callsign AIR INDIA). Until then please do not make any changes.

Lastly please learn to sign you posts on talk pages.
Abhishek191288 (talk) 04:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

When you make any edit to an article, please learn to add a valuable source to prove your claim. Unreferenced changes can be challenged or removed.
Abhishek191288 (talk) 11:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Your edits here: [1], [2] and [3] do not have any edit summary. Instead of just writing a hidden note, please provide an edit summary, it would be very helpful. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 07:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on airport articles

Kindly stop removing Air India Regional from destinations list. Only IC is dead, not CD. —Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 16:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, provide source saying that CD code is retired...source only state that IC has merged into AI. Snoozlepet (talk) 20:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AI Regional CONTINUES to operate as a SEPRATE airline it has not disappeared like Indian, only their CD code has been merged/dropped, replaced by AI 9XXX four digit flight number, you can check newly updated AI website schedule and look up flights that previously used CD code. So IC and CD codes have both gone, its now only AI code in use for Air India and Air India Regional.116.71.8.148 (talk) 15:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When your edits are being undone, it means there is some concern. Instead of blindly reverting, you should have a discussion on the same. If you continue to remove CD destinations, I'll have to report to an admin. —Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 02:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring against consensus

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]