Jump to content

User:Sacspe16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user page has been vandalized 0 times.
Wikipedia:TwinkleThis user reverts vandalism in the blink of an eye with Twinkle!
User:Scepia/computer
newsThe only reality show this user watches is the news.
New pages

20 September 2024

WP:Recent changes

List of abbreviations (help):
D
Edit made at Wikidata
r
Edit flagged by ORES
N
New page
m
Minor edit
b
Bot edit
(±123)
Page byte size change

20 September 2024

Dashboard


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 1
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 119
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 70
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 12
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 17
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 87
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 13
Open sockpuppet investigations 337
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]
AfD debates relisted 3 or more times
All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Template:Admin dashboard
Template:Admin dashboard/light
Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox
Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no drafts
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no portals
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD / PRODs

[edit]

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Other candidates 11

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Nationwide opinion polling for the 2024 United States presidential election

[edit]

Reason: Consistent editing by an IP user to change table averages to use mid-range values despite most users using arithmetic mean, and talk page discussion to build consensus around this. This occurs several times a day (15 in the previous 24 hours).

There has also been some recent vandalism. 103.8.18.128 (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

143 (Katy Perry album)

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Tim Walz

[edit]

Reason: Content Dispute and Disruptive Editing WP:CT/AP 2601:282:4700:272:EC:9C58:DF8D:4A7B (talk) 23:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Could WP:1RR be enforced here please? IanDBeacon (talk) 01:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Ecp 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F840:EDB3:7AD8:B838 (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

New Democratic Party

[edit]

Reason: High level of edit warring. The talk page suggests that some of the edits are based on WP:OR. Argenator (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

It seems like the same users are edit warring in Alberta New Democratic Party over the same thing. Argenator (talk) 00:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Nemahsis

[edit]

Reason: IP Vandalism Cactoideae (talk) 01:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

List of Tamil films of 2023

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs returned again with the dispute over highest grossing film. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 03:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

X-Men '97

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP changing vandal who considers the mention of a non-binary character to be "hateful vandalism". soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

User(s) re-blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

R. C. Majumdar

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Algeria

[edit]

Reason: High level of disruptive IP and sockpuppet activity. Various SPAs attempt to vote in the ongoing RfC on the talk page, disrupting the consensus-building process.[1][2][3][4][5] Skitash (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Rožaje

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has been disrupted by various IPs for months. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Radical right (United States)

[edit]

Reason: Longterm interference by US IPs, particularly reinsertion of a bloated "See also" section despite various reverts and user warnings. A quick check of their contributions makes it highly likely that these are all the same person. I would request indefinite page protection for the time being. Biohistorian15 (talk) 12:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

The Mask of Zorro

[edit]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP range edit-warring over plot summary. DonIago (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Socialism with Chinese characteristics

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Further protection needed for a longer duration. Amigao (talk) 13:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Apollo 17

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Mohammed Deif

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article falls under WP:ARBECR and it is currently being flooded by IPs making disruptive edits. Ïvana (talk) 17:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Kaviyoor Ponnamma

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently died. Hence lot of edits which is hard to verify. Aadirulez8 (talk) 17:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

KFVS-TV

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Buttons_(pantomime)

[edit]

Reason: Vandalism due to a running joke made in the final episode of The Grand Tour. TarnumJ (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

North Macedonia national football team

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow edit war by IPs adding unnecessary trivial information to the article. Level 4 warnings given to IPs on 17 and 20 September. Third IP reported to WP:AIV a few minutes ago. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Ajaz Khan

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The revision history of the article shows numerous reversions of vandalism caused by IP editors and newly created accounts almost every month going back to December 2023. Since April 2024, this appears to have become even more frequent. This page has been protected multiple times since 2017, including a 3-year page protection from 2020 to February 2023. A long-term temporary protection, or at this point even indefinite protection, would be useful. – notwally (talk) 22:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

The Cure

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep 1) adding an album yet to be released or formally announced 2) removing the hidden note that says not to add it. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 22:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Shortcuts

Talk:2024 Lebanon pager explosions

[edit]

Reason: I hope it can be pointed out on the discussion page that the explosive devices were not limited to Gold Apollo; devices from the well-known Japanese company Icom Incorporated also exploded. 58.152.168.150 (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
The page is no longer protected since the protection was temporary. CharlieEdited (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Talk page protection expired six hours ago. A window of opportunity presents itself. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


2024 Lebanon pager explosions

[edit]

Change the "mainly Hezbollah members" note on the casualties to "mainly civilians" as a large swath of Hezbollah casualties were apart of their political wing and considered civilians under international law, as well as ensuring the hundreds of medical staff who use pagers and were injured are not ignored. By simply stating that the majority of casualties were apart of Hezbollah, is suggests that the majority of casualties were non-civilian, which is inherently incorrect as stated above. It is imperative that this fact be clarified to prevent misinformation and further demonization of Lebanon.

Furthermore, it must be stated clearly and constantly that not only were the vast majority of the victims civilians, but that such an attack is, by definition and intent, a terror attack on Lebanon by israel (as israel has now confirmed they were behind it and had been planning it for an unspecified length of time). The severity of the attack in the context of international law must also be stated clearly as this is a clear violation of the Geneva Convention and general international law that protects civilians from attack and prohibits the use of terrorism a a legitimate manner of warfare.

For evidence to the above claims, see https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/9/18/israels-war-on-gaza-live-thousands-injured-in-lebanon-pager-explosions in which multiple quotes from israel, Hezbollah, the Lebanese Health Ministry, the UN, and various other third-parties with weight on the issue can be found and used to validate the above claims. Against the Empire (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

  • "Mainly Hezbollah members" should be changed to "mainly civilians"
I am not aware of a single reliable source that has confirmed that most of the casualties were civilian. This is also something that I doubt will come to light very quickly, since Hezbollah generally does not like publishing lists of their soldiers, so discerning who is and isn't a soldier is extremely difficult. Hezbollah themselves claiming that "most casualties were civilian" is not evidence, as Hezbollah is not a reliable source on this matter, since they are known to regularly lie for propaganda purposes.
And suppose that we did have a reliable source claim that most casualties were civilian. This would still not change the fact that most reliable source primarily describe the casualties as "mainly Hezbollah members" and only talk about civilians second. The article must reflect the style of reliable formats, so it cannot assign more importance to their civilian status than their Hezbollah membership unless reliable sources also do so.
  • Medical staff should not be ignored
They are not ignored. Such information is mentioned under the "Casualties" section. Admittedly, this section could be expanded, and it probably will be with time.
  • Calling casualties mainly Hezbollah members suggests they are not civilians
No it doesn't. The interested reader is free to visit the Hezbollah article and read about their organization. It is not Wikipedia's job to correct every single possible misunderstanding that a reader might have at every possible moment.
  • This demonizes Lebanon
No it doesn't. There is no reason that the article's failure to clarify the exact makeup of the casualties should lead readers to conclude that Hezbollah is evil. And even if it does, this won't lead to the demonization of Lebanon, but that of Hezbollah.
And besides, it's not Wikipedia's job to prevent demonization. And even if it were, the change you suggest would lead to much more demonization of Israel than it would prevent demonization of Hezbollah, so the net change would be more demonization in the world.
  • It must be stated clearly and constantly...
No it shouldn't. That would be annoying to read.
  • Israel has now confirmed they were behind it
Where did you read this? It's news to me. You should really cite a source here, it would make a great addition to the article.
Dieknon (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Talk:2024 Lebanon pager explosions

[edit]

(I did not put the talk page by mistake in the page title field, that was intentional)

Add topic about the sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" in the third paragraph of the article, with the next paragraph as the body of the topic:

The sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" appears to contradict other pieces of information in the article, specifically that two children died from the explosions. Hezbollah doesn't seem to have a history of using child soldiers in any capacity. The reported ages of the children who died seem to be around the range of 8-11, so I think it's safe to assume that the children who died were not members of Hezbollah. The size of the explosions wouldn't of been enough to kill someone without being in close proximity to it (its not like the pagers had a blast radius of several hundred meters), which implies that the children were either holding the pager or in close proximity to the pagers. Therefore, it can be assumed that non-Hezbollah members were carrying pagers. Granted, I doubt these children were carrying around a pager wherever they went, but they must've been relatively close to it in order to be killed by the pager (as in, holding or carrying the pager).

The reason why I'm saying to add a topic to the talk page instead of just "remove this sentence from the article" is because it's debatable if it actually does contradict, and I'd prefer to get some consensus about it beforehand. I can't request an edit of the article on the talk page due to it being protected, so I can't just use the edit request to gauge consensus on this issue. This could also very well be considered WP:OR, I'm of the opinion that "the explosive that requires one to be close to it to hurt them implies that people who were hurt by it were close to it" would fall under WP:CALC, but I could see consensus going either way on this. AlexChillOut (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Here is a source used two sentences later in the same article for the claim about the children who died: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd7xnelvpepo
Also, here is a source to show the range of the explosives, it can be seen in the video that they have a rather short range: https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/lebanon-pagers-attack-hezbollah/index.html
That video is already uploaded to Wikipedia, and can be found here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:CCTV_video_of_pager_explosion_in_a_Beirut_market.webm
The rest is mainly these two pieces of information put together, a pager killing a child implies the child was close enough to it to be injured; based on the range shown in the video, they were likely holding it. The source that is cited for the sentence I believe should be removed adds that it was not *immediately* clear, not that it's unclear now (https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/dozens-wounded-after-pagers-detonate-lebanon-officials-point-113754464) AlexChillOut (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Found another source, this one states that "[s]he picked up the device to bring it to her father and was holding it when it exploded, mangling her face and leaving the room covered in blood". Safe to assume she was not a Hezbollah member, as she was 9 years old. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/18/world/middleeast/lebanon-funeral-pager-attack.html AlexChillOut (talk) 02:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

2024_Lebanon_pager_explosions#cite_note-13

[edit]

Remove ", including at least 12 civilians" in second sentence. The citation links to an ABC News article which says that "At least 12 civilians were killed and at least 2,800 people injured in the explosions that took place Tuesday, according to Lebanese authorities." However 12 is the total number of people that were reported killed from the Tuesday explosions, not the number of civilian casualties. 104.246.129.48 (talk) 05:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. You can propose this at Talk:2024 Lebanon pager explosions. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Freedom Caucus

[edit]

Greg Murphy is not a member of the Freedom Caucus. Source here (at the bottom of the article): https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/19/politics/north-carolina-governor-mark-robinson/index.html Alxcrn (talk) 18:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. You can propose this at Talk:Freedom Caucus. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

19 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Wikipedia languages/core (request) 2024-07-27 11:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-07-30 19:50 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Editinginterface (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotices/Namespace/MediaWiki (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 Fully protected (log) Protected by Amalthea on 2011-05-31: "interface page, transcluded in MadiaWiki space"
User:HotArticlesBot/Config.json (request) 2024-08-27 11:03 User JSON page (log)
Template:Dablink (request) 2024-08-31 15:54 Fully protected (log) Protected by Ral315 on 2005-12-20: "High visibility, no need to edit it."
Template:In string (request) 2024-09-03 23:19 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Collapse top (request) 2024-09-04 04:57 Fully protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk template or module; used in system message"
User:Community Tech bot/Popular pages config.json (request) 2024-09-05 19:39 User JSON page (log)
Template:Blocked text (request) 2024-09-06 21:08 Fully protected (log) Protected by MSGJ on 2022-02-25: "Highly visible template: used in interface messages"
Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Category (request) 2024-09-10 16:15 Fully protected (log) Protected by Amalthea on 2011-05-31: "interface page, transcluded in MadiaWiki space"
Template:Bullet (request) 2024-09-11 15:01 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Navshortcuts (request) 2024-09-13 12:19 Fully protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2021-01-30: "Highly visible template: added to users' JS pages"
Wikipedia:Database reports/Local files with a duplicate on Commons/Ignore (request) 2024-09-13 18:35 Fully protected (log) Protected by Fastily on 2017-09-29: "bot config page"
Module:Message box (request) 2024-09-13 20:46 Cascade-protected from Main Page (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-11-16: "restore"
Module:Disambiguation/templates (request) 2024-09-16 06:45 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-fullwidth (request) 2024-09-16 11:55 MediaWiki page (log)
Brianna Wu (request) 2024-09-20 04:14 Fully protected (log) Protected by Courcelles on 2023-06-24: "Arbitration enforcement"
Template:Did you know (request) 2024-09-20 14:42 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
12 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox comedian (request) 2024-08-20 02:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox song contest national year (request) 2024-08-23 19:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by CT Cooper on 2015-03-01: "Merging has increased use, so upping protection to template editors only."
Template:Infobox election (request) 2024-08-24 13:40 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-03-02: ">9500 transclusions, set to change from SP/A to TE/TE"
Module:Excerpt/config (request) 2024-08-27 04:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Johnuniq on 2020-08-30: "oops, meant to be TP"
Module:Political party (request) 2024-09-13 06:12 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2021-11-18: "High-risk template or module: 13487 transclusions (more info)"
Module:MultiReplace (request) 2024-09-17 16:38 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Sports table (request) 2024-09-18 23:46 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikAnimal on 2016-04-19: "Highly visible template"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-09-19 22:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Icon/data (request) 2024-09-20 07:53 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2015-01-23: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Sports results (request) 2024-09-20 09:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by Samsara on 2019-03-24: "High-risk Lua module: 4000+ transclusions; via RfPP"
Template:WikiProject Norway (request) 2024-09-20 14:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-17: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Country data Guadeloupe (request) 2024-09-20 19:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2013-10-17: "Not quite high-risk enough now that we have a trusted template editor right."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)


WP:RFA

[edit]

RFA= Requests for adminship

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Significa liberdade 152 26 11 85 22:18, 21 September 2024 0 days, 22 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 23:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFP

[edit]

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for accountcreator

Account creator

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Tiggerjay

[edit]

Returning from a wiki-break, former ACC. Happy to help with the backlog. TiggerJay (talk) 07:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done – not a currently an active member of the WP:ACC team — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Intruder007

[edit]

I would like to introduce an exceptional editor and author with a amazing track record in editing and article creation. Created 182 articles, none of which have been deleted, with the majority focusing on BLPs. Nice editor, and it’s clear that he is one of the editors for whom this user right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Those are nice, clean bios. Just stop naming non-notable siblings, please, Intruder007. Schwede66 19:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! About the siblings, I was just following the format of other articles, but I'll take it into account. Intruder007 (talk) 21:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Namesnik

[edit]

Of course, I am ashamed that I have not yet made 400, 300 or even 150 articles and most likely will never make that many. But I can say in my «defense» that more than half of them are rare goods, they are world premieres. Before that, there were no such articles in Wikipedias. And I had to create Wikidata for many of them, categories on Commons and start from scratch. It is important for me to make articles in the English Wikipedia, because this immediately promotes a new topic to the whole world. --- - Names·nik·tlk 16:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Good work. Please have a look at MOS:SECTIONORDER. Schwede66 19:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks x2! Once again, please accept my deepest gratitude for such a quick decision. --- - Names·nik·tlk 22:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Longhornsg

[edit]

A good editor with a solid history of article creation, having created 135 articles, with only one being PROD’d in 2014 and another AfD’d in 2018. The other three deletions, which were G6 and G8, are not particularly significant. Since 2018, none of their articles have been deleted. Their article creation primarily focuses on BLPs, demonstrating their knowledge of notability guidelines. I don’t believe they would abuse the right, and granting it would help reduce the backlog. GrabUp - Talk 05:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done and thanks for your recent nominations, GrabUp. It's really helpful. – Joe (talk) 10:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Hansmuller

[edit]

A good editor and content creator, they have created a total of 133 articles. One was deleted via G14 in 2022, and another was deleted via A3 back in 2014. Since then, they have created many BLPs and other topic articles, none of which have been deleted. I think they are good to go. GrabUp - Talk 16:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

User:GnocchiFan

[edit]

GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

File mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:98Tigerius

[edit]

Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 17:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

User:S-Aura

[edit]

Hello, I am requesting for Page Mover rights on Wikipedia. I have been an active contributor and have made significant contributions.

I believe in my experience and understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 09:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 1024 total edits. — MusikBot talk 09:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. WP:PMCRITERIA mention 3,000 edits as a guideline for granting, which you're significantly under. However, the biggest problem is that you've only performed 10 page moves thus far, so you don't have a demonstrated need for the tools at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

User:GhostInTheMachine

[edit]

I occasionally rename new articles to fix poor titles. I also sometimes want to move new articles to draftspace. Generally, neither case needs a redirect for the old title. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

User:RodRabelo7

[edit]

Hello, I'm requesting the page mover permission to help deal with the backlog on Wikipedia:Requested moves, particularly the technical moves but also the requested moves with clear consensus. I have been participating in such discussions with some frequency for a while now, also suggesting the move of some pages myself (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc., all of them moved), and I believe my participation with this permission would be beneficial to the project, especially regarding the backlog, as previously mentioned. Sometimes I try to close obvious consensus, but without being a page mover, I cannot do so and have to rely on a page mover (e.g., 1, 2, 3). I have read the policy and, for what it's worth, I always adopt the maxim "if I am not sure, I won't do it" in my edits. Thank you, RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC) RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Dekimasuよ! 01:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

User:KylieTastic

[edit]

Hi, as part of working at AfC I come across submissions on editors main userpage or sandbox that need to be cleanly moved to draft (i.e. without leaving a redirect). I stopped moving such submissions years ago as if the editor starts another article I was then the creator rather the actual creator which never seemed right to me. It would also be useful for when new editors create/move drafts to the Wikipedia or Template namespaces either in error or attempting to promote/spam. KylieTastic (talk) 12:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Tvfunhouse

[edit]

I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Aliy Dawut

[edit]

Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

User:HypeBoy

[edit]

I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Mischellemougly

[edit]

I have 16 months experience in editing Wikipedia. I wish to contribute whole lot of my time for betterment of Wikipedia and reduce the backlog in all possible ways that I can. As an initial step towards it, I am applying for granting this user right, so I can use it to improve pages in Wikipedia. Thank You! Mischellemougly (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Rofraja

[edit]

I have been reviewing and fixing bare URLs for the past year and I would like to try something different. I'd like to get reviewer rights to be able to start reviewing from a different angle. Rofraja (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Requests for rollback


Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 1
    Requests for unblock 123
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 1
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 13
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 17

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 840
    Templates for deletion 223
    Categories for deletion 124
    Wikipedia files for discussion 18
    All redirects for discussion 519
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 36
    Possible copyright violations 13
    All articles proposed for deletion 266
    All files proposed for deletion 6
    Unsorted AfD debates 0
    All files with the same name on Commons 1
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 453
    Unknown copyright status 41
    Unknown source 25
    No non-free use rationale 2
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 6

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,242
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 445
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,379
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,648 0.5
    All articles needing rewrite 5,894 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,316 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 39,076 0.57

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 10,961 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 526,908 7.65
    All articles lacking sources 82,955 1.2
    All unreferenced BLPs 701 0.06
    All articles needing additional references 464,512 6.75
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,555 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,620 1.53
    All articles with dead external links 305,933 4.44

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 144 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 19 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,652 0.02
    All articles to be split 809 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 0 -
    Stub categories 19,239 -
    All uncategorized pages 1,023 0.01
    All orphaned articles 54,691 0.79
    All articles needing copy edit 2,739 0.04
    All articles with style issues 19,457 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,740 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,581 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 289
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,666
    All accuracy disputes 15,766
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 1
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 3
    All articles to be expanded 66,155

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links

    References

    [edit]
    Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Sacspe16&oldid=749260433"