User talk:Redvers

This user may have left Wikipedia. Redvers has not edited Wikipedia since June 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Redvers is

male •

gay •

married •

a socialist •

a vegetarian •

Welsh •

an atheist • and I rush to danger but wind up nowhere

`01`	`02`	`03`	`04`	`05`	`06`	`07`	`08`	`09`	`10`
`11`	`12`	`13`	`14`	`15`	`16`	`17`	`18`	`19`	`20`
`21`	`22`	`23`	`24`	`25`	`26`	`27`	`28`	`29`	`30`
`31`	`32`	`33`	`34`	`35`	`36`	`37`	`38`	`39`	`40`
`41`	`42`	`43`	`44`	`45`	`46`	`47`	`48`	`49`	`50`

		Don't post your images to Commons. Why not?
		DON'T post "talkback" templates. I'm already watchlisting your talk page
		Watchlist this page to see replies

Protected edit request on 6 September 2019

This edit request to User:Redvers/New Users has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace entire content with the following:

#REDIRECT [[Help:Your first article]]

{{Rcat shell|
{{R to help namespace}}
}}

This is to fix a double redirect, as the target has moved. (Even though the editor is inactive, this page has numerous existing links to it.) – Wdchk (talk) 02:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done however @Wdchk: I've reduced the protection level and you may edit it directly. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done: Thank you for reducing the protection level. Once this was done, a bot was able to fix the double redirect. Then I added the rcat. (This thread applies to the subpage User:Redvers/New Users.) – Wdchk (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Inglés" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inglés. Since you had some involvement with the Inglés redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. —Yours sincerely, Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 14:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eric Syddique

The article Eric Syddique has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL having only been elected at a local level. References do not speak to WP:GNG criteria of significant coverage about the individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 15:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox military memorial

Template:Infobox military memorial has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox monument. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Beachcomber (TV series)

The article The Beachcomber (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to meet the notability guidelines. Sources that would give this potential to be notable cannot be located.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. aaronneallucas (talk) 03:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Beachcomber (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Beachcomber (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beachcomber (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

aaronneallucas (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]