User:Diannaa/Dashboard
Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 11:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC) |
Reports
- 159.192.220.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:37, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:58a:8e7e:8380:c9c6:ef40:dcc:2188 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 207.47.155.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:98d:c080:67dd::c2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Happyfeet1234567890 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:23, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 135.180.61.27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 136.32.196.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:42, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 49.225.108.224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:14d:4a82:6fd0:f58d:f64d:4ba1:4f3c (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yihanbai98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:fb1:e1:11d0:f43f:4024:51a2:eef6 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 112.208.65.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 809 twice in the last 5 minutes (Possible SPI/Project space disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:12, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 185.110.114.117 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 144.178.110.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 125.165.153.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 125.165.153.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 5.159.200.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 50 five times in the last 5 minutes (Shouting, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:09, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 103.103.88.221 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - 412 was changed by 103.103.88.221 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857183 on 2025-02-25T12:20:08+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 12:20, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 24.150.41.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On New York City synagogue tunnel incident: Resumed edit war for which they were blocked in January. Jfire (talk) 04:48, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2409:408A:8CBE:1A0E:5850:6F31:E541:BFD8 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On List of Hindi television channels: IP vandalism. Vandalism after Final Warning. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 05:23, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- 51.155.18.27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism, including: 1 2 Saucy[talk – contribs] 09:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sallyk20254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Sole aim is to vandalize "Matt Goss" page. Same editor using IP account to vandalize same page. Padibso (talk) 11:48, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Nicosmells (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:20, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "smell(y|s)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:20, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file the word "smelly" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 19:20, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Urmomaintlonely (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Spermaba4onok (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "sperm" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:10, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Platinum Locations Location Resources Santa Monica (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Debbiefux (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "fux" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:20, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Username12239 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MIK Productions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Scientologyabuses (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. User is editing about Scientology with this username. Aspening (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Edited once to a talk page to make a requested edit. I've asked them to change their name. Secretlondon (talk) 17:43, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- No. 1baddie (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Offensive username. "Baddie" is a sexual slang word. RaschenTechner (talk) 16:44, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Just a vandal, really. Secretlondon (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not just that, but "baddie" can simply mean "bad guy" and the edit history shows WP:NOTHERE. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:43, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- ORGAN SECURITY SERVICE (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. ZimZalaBim talk 18:03, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- This is just a common-or-garden vandal. No promotion of musical organs security or bodily organs security. Secretlondon (talk) 18:13, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- TheMarketingMan23 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Electricmemory (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- No contributions at all? Secretlondon (talk) 20:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Tule-hog (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Improper name. 2804:14C:5BB1:9473:1F99:A6FC:42:37A (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Improper in what way, IPv6? Does tule have some second meaning? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Don't knew. In any case, we should avoid doubts that serve to mask dog whistles. 2804:14C:5BB1:9473:B12:CB73:69B5:BD88 (talk) 13:43, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like they're thinking about Thule#In Nazi ideology. If the editor acts like a Nazi, sure it's an issue. Otherwise, no. It could be a riff on Tule fog. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:30, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Improper in what way, IPv6? Does tule have some second meaning? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Agnieszkalukasiak (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). Appears to represent Agnieszka Lukasiak. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 16:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Real names are fine, this is COI. Secretlondon (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Secretlondon Wouldn't this fall under {{uw-ublock-wellknown}}? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:19, 24 February 2025 (UTC)- It depends if it is credible that they are an impersonator. I don't block for well known in cases where it's much more likely to be COI. The account looks like they are person trying to update their page so I think blocking them to make them prove their identity is wrong, when we don't care about that, we care about the COI. Secretlondon (talk) 20:42, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Secretlondon Wouldn't this fall under {{uw-ublock-wellknown}}? --Ahecht (TALK
- Real names are fine, this is COI. Secretlondon (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- AP of Euranasia (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. User created a draft about the Islamic State of Azerbaijan party. Their username seems promotional. GoingBatty (talk) 20:22, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- GoingBatty, what is the user promoting? Cullen328 (talk) 20:59, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- The Islamic State of Azerbaijan party, in a since deleted draft. GoingBatty (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- GoingBatty, yes, I know. But what does that have to do with the precise username "AP of Euranasia"? Cullen328 (talk) 03:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- The Islamic State of Azerbaijan party, in a since deleted draft. GoingBatty (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- GoingBatty, what is the user promoting? Cullen328 (talk) 20:59, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Budgetairsupply (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Shellwood (talk) 10:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Doctpro (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Shellwood (talk) 10:58, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- B2B Exports USA (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:B2B Exports USA. Annh07 (talk) 11:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Electricmemory (talk) 06:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Page protection is not to be used for getting your way in a dispute over content. BusterD (talk) 11:58, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the most recent temporary semi-protection expired about a week ago, vandalism started again almost immediately and has now happened at least twice since the expiration of the protection. Steel1943 (talk) 06:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:04, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Endless amounts of reverts and unproductive editing coming from IP's. Even though I understand wikipedia isn't a crystal ball, we can expect a lot more edits to come from his bid for governor of Ohio. AsaQuathern (talk) 07:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Per WP:AMPOL. BusterD (talk) 12:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Electricmemory (talk) 07:23, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unconstructive edits from IP users/newly created accounts. The recent edits from two new users, deleted content without a clear reason. Hotwiki (talk) 07:27, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated removal of (well-sourced) line that Anton was found guilty of crime by single editor who has not engaged in conversation. U003F? 07:32, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hi! I had recently requested protection for Cat but I should have specified the Talk page too. Both have constant vandalism, mostly from IPs. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 07:36, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 08:10, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, which involves unconstructive reverting of content. --oxmx (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is frequently vandalized by an IP hopper. Pending changes is not enough to prevent this. CycloneYoris talk! 10:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per edits like [1][2][3]. There's a lot of media-coverage. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:18, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of another week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:10, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Canadien1867 (talk) 11:19, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated spamming by IPs. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Each time the protection expires, IP editors and new accounts continue to vandalize the page with negative stuff. Pls consider protecting it again indefinitely and allow only extended accounts to update it. Padibso (talk) 11:37, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:19, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Most people vandalize his page because he is infamous. The last protection log was in 2018 done by an admin who is retired and has left Wikipedia, as a result I am going to this page to request unprotection. A probationary period should be instated to see whether vandalism will happen under auto confirmed protection. Admins might think this is a contentious topics that warrants extended-confirmed but this is untrue, that is for antisemitism in POLAND, not Germany. 135.180.61.27 (talk) 05:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- It warrants ec-protection because disruption even from auto-confirmed accounts was too much to be handled. I wouldn't lower protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:04, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: WP:TRYUNPROT, last protected in 2019. :). MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 08:59, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist:, the protecting admin, now notified in accordance with the bright yellow instruction at the top of this section. Favonian (talk) 09:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
In Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 38 she clearly states that Christ was divine from eternity.
"There had been no change in the position or authority of Christ. Lucifer's envy and misrepresentation and his claims to equality with Christ had made necessary a statement of the true position of the Son of God; but this had been the same from the beginning. Many of the angels were, however, blinded by Lucifer's deceptions." 47.176.191.146 (talk) 06:33, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- What change are you proposing? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:19, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:18, 25 February 2025 (UTC) |
10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:04, 25 February 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
---|
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 31 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 124 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
---|