Template talk:Main inter-regional railway lines in Great Britain

Trains Portal

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This template is supported by WikiProject UK Railways.

London Transport

This template is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles

I hope this doesn't overcomplicate things but shouldn't other regional main lines be added? They count as being part of the British system so they would be British main lines. They could be split into England, Scotland and Wales. Simply south 22:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This template is for the national/really big mainlines. There are templates for each regions already. Our Phellap 22:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Layout and standards of these templates

Editors may be interested in the debate currently ongoing at Template talk:Railway lines in South-East England over the layout, classification and geographical scope of these templates. Pickle 16:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cross Country Route

Is this really, seriously and truly a "Classic" main line??? Can someone name me a named train that uses this route (apart from the 'Cheltenham Flyer', which is really a GWR train) that can sit alongside the Royal Scot, the Flying Scotsman, the Cornish Riviera Express or the Master Cutler ... I doubt it!!! Can I make a case for removing this faux main line.Canterberry 21:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]