Template:Did you know nominations/Vera Baboun
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Vera Baboun
[edit]... that Vera Baboun, the first female mayor of Bethlehem, has been noted by Die Welt for her striking green eyes?
- Reviewed: Otome Sensō
- Comment: 2000 new to namespace 25 Dec 2012
Created/expanded by ClaudeReigns (talk). Self nom at 08:03, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
I really tried to promote this, but concluded that the hook needs to be better written, more interesting, and less frivolous, so I'm instead sending it back for a reworking. Google translate renders the Die Welt sentence as "with striking green eyes has ambitious goals". I was frankly more impressed that she was a "Ph.D. candidate in Arab-American women’s literature" at the time of her election. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Vera Baboun, the first female mayor of Bethlehem, was a Ph.D. candidate in Arab-American women's literature at the time of her election?
- Alt 2: ... that Palestinian Christian Vera Baboun, Bethlehem's first female mayor, holds a Master's degree in African-American literature?
- I like the contrast in ALT2, but an inline source needs to be added after the relevant article sentence before the hook can be approved. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Clarified citations throughout lead for whichever facts we choose. Better? ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I threw in an ALT1 too, but either is fine with me ;) Rcej (Robert) – talk 08:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Whatever's clever :) ClaudeReigns (talk) 08:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Approving ALT2 now that it has that inline source citation. While I'd like to approve ALT1, since Robert use my exact words to construct it, doing so would be a clear conflict of interest. (I also think ALT2's African-American literature is even more hooky than Arab-American literature in this situation, probably outweighing the Ph.D.) The promoter can do a self-approval, if desired. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Whatever's clever :) ClaudeReigns (talk) 08:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I threw in an ALT1 too, but either is fine with me ;) Rcej (Robert) – talk 08:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Clarified citations throughout lead for whichever facts we choose. Better? ClaudeReigns (talk) 07:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
