Talk:Battle of Bhupalgarh

Military history: Asian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Disputed

Whole page of battle of bhupalgarh is misleading. 106.78.36.24 (talk) 08:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is correct then? Provide your version with Sources. This wikipedia article has clear sources. Let me guess.... Your only source is the bullshi+ propaganda bollywood movie. This is a fact, and shivaji hated sambhaji. That is why his generals betrayed sambhaji and sided with mughals. Hisenberg3376 (talk) 09:47, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Books That Prove Sambhaji Did NOT Fight for the Mughals:

1. “Raja ShivChatrapati” by Babasaheb Purandare

• Nowhere does it mention Sambhaji fighting alongside the Mughals.

• Instead, it describes how the Mughals attacked and destroyed the fort.

2. “Chhatrapati Sambhaji” by Dr. Jaysingrao Pawar

• It explains that Sambhaji Maharaj never helped the Mughals but was a victim of political rumors.

3. “Shrimant Yogi” by Ranjit Desai

• This book, a historical novel based on facts, clearly states that Sambhaji was loyal to the Marathas.

These are not bollywood sources kindly read it and do necessary changes ImiOSuser (talk) 23:26, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle of Bhupalgarh took place in 1679 between the Mughal Empire and the Marathas. The fort of Bhupalgarh, located in present-day Maharashtra, was built by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and served as a strategic defense post for the Marathas.

Correct Information about the Battle of Bhupalgarh:

The battle was part of the ongoing conflict between the Marathas and the Mughals during the late 17th century.
The Mughals, under the leadership of Diler Khan and Bahadur Khan, launched an attack on Bhupalgarh in 1679.
The Marathas fiercely resisted the attack, but due to the overwhelming Mughal forces, the fort was eventually captured.
After taking control, the Mughals destroyed Bhupalgarh Fort to weaken Maratha defenses in the region.
Sambhaji Maharaj was not involved in this battle against his father, as falsely claimed in some sources. In reality, Sambhaji’s temporary conflict with Shivaji happened later but was unrelated to this battle.

Amitgtdesigner (talk) 09:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please create new wiki page with correct info.

Owner of this page is clearly spreading fake information from unreliable source.

Also there are lot of typos on this page.

It looks like it is written by some noob. Compilejs9 (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 February 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Some mistakes are in the page . 2402:8100:25D4:8F4B:E79E:1AD8:D308:67B9 (talk) 00:56, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What changes would you specifically like to be made? E_F⁵ 01:05, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 03:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No mistakes.... the page has clear sources from history. While your only source is a bollywood propaganda movie. Bring clear sources. Sambhaji is a stupid that is why, his generals who loved shivaji betrayed him and sided with mughals. Sambhaji just tasted his own medicine. So, nothing wrong. Hisenberg3376 (talk) 09:50, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grammatical and Spelling errors.

Could someone fix the spelling and grammatical errors in the article?

since a lot of folks who don’t understand Wikipedia are taking offence to this article, let’s ensure that the article reads well. 164.68.205.148 (talk) 04:22, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 February 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

There is no source of Sambhaji violating any Brahman women, and also no reference has been cited on this claim. This is character assassination of Sambhaji. It should be immediately deleted from this page and other pages of Wikipedia wherever such claims are mentioned without any source. 206.84.224.88 (talk) 03:20, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: CaptainEek has since added multiple references to the sentence in question. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where did this happen?

Right now the infobox says it happened in "Bhupalgarh (Banur, Maharashtra)." Although there are several Wikilink canidates for that, I wasn't sure which one in particular. It would be nice to add a sentence like "The battle happened at Bhupalgarh (Banur, Maharashtra), in what is present day....." But we need to figure out what the present day place is in the first instance. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 04:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I think I answered my own question upon finding that there is another spelling of the name. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 04:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 February 2025 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The information provided is inaccurate or wrong I have proper information about the event with proper source pls let me make an edit on the page Nihalyadav2006 (talk) 13:11, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 15:44, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]