Talk:Yongle railway station (Taiwan)

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alishan Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 December 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved. (closed by page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– Disambiguate from Yongle railway station (Beijing). Per WP:2DABS, unless someone sees a primary topic, the dab should be at Yongle railway station. A recent RfC suggests that the qualifier for this article should be " (Taiwan)". Certes (talk) 21:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by proposer: @Bradv, Szqecs, Dicklyon, SMcCandlish, and JFG: Thank you for your work on the RM earlier this month which removed a lot of anomalies. I'd have supported you if I'd noticed, but I think this one page is an exception because a similarly named station exists in Beijing. Certes (talk) 21:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This is entirely reasonable. Brad v 22:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, though in the absence of any kind of "Yongle [something else] station" I'm not sure I see any need for "railway" to be in the title of any of these. Maybe this is just tension between WP:CONSISTENT and WP:CONCISE. I lean toward the concise side (i.e. avoid over-disambiguation), but if virtually every article in these categories has "railway" in the name of it, that's a strong consistency argument. I agree neither seems to clearly be a primary topic. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 00:36, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because there are other kinds of stations, like power stations, radio stations etc. There are templates used to link to all articles with a similar names. Every exception is an annoyance. Szqecs (talk) 03:51, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of preemptive disambiguation is like what's done in WP:UKSTATION and used consistently in China, Taiwan, and lots of other countries. I like it. Dicklyon (talk) 05:53, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It should be Yongle railway station (Yilan). Szqecs (talk) 03:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you say why the county is better than the more minimal/recognizable disambiguation to Taiwan? Dicklyon (talk) 05:53, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple stations with the same name in a state, in which case you have to go one level further down, which means more rules. I prefer to keep it simple. Szqecs (talk) 10:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would be equally happy with (Yilan), but country then county/community has a clear consensus according to this RfC. Certes (talk) 11:53, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this going to be implemented worldwide though? Also I would argue that England, Scotland etc are not sovereign states, so using them is no different to using subdivisions in other states. Szqecs (talk) 12:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I assume it's worldwide as no one said otherwise. I felt it best to go with the decision for new titles like the Taiwan station but I've not proposed moving the Beijing station today, as I don't see anyone actively moving existing pages yet. As for England vs UK, perhaps that's a question for WikiProject Trains. Certes (talk) 14:16, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, so unless you are willing to apply it worldwide, you would be breaking consistency. Szqecs (talk) 14:56, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Alternatively, go with Szqecs's suggestion, since he's the one who has been working on Taiwan naming conventions. Dicklyon (talk) 05:53, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support the "(Taiwan)" variant. — JFG ^talk 07:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yongle railway station (Taiwan) per above. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 17:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.