Talk:Yang Luchan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yang Luchan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Author information image
[edit]Some years back, I have uploaded Image:Yang Luchan.jpg from the English Wikipedia to Commons. Now there seems to be a problem with the image, as no author information is given. I do not know where the image comes from originally, so I can't provide the information. Unfortunately, meanwhile the original image has been deleted, so I do not know who uploaded the original image, to ask him. Does anybody here know about the original source of the picture? It would be very helpful if you could add this information to the image! --Olenz (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Yang Luchan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Yang Luchan.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 19 May 2012
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Yang Luchan.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC) |
Requested move 7 July 2015
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 09:15, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Yang Lu-ch'an → Yang Luchan – Is there a reason why Wade-Giles was preferred over Pinyin? "Yang Lu-ch'an" doesn't even show up on Google Ngrams: [1] --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 22:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC) Timmyshin (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Actually, the nonstandard "Yang Lu Chan" has results on Ngrams even if the Wade-Giles doesn't, and it's almost as popular as the pinyin. It seems similar to how "Tai Chi Chuan" is a common variant of "T'ai chi ch'uan". People just don't like the hyphens and apostrophes I guess, but also can't be bothered to learn pinyin. Google search results are inconclusive. Personally, I rarely see the pinyin variant, even though I prefer it. To me, there isn't a clear winner. --diff (talk) 01:50, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose use the traditional common spelling instead, Yang Lu Chan , since it is a Wade-Giles variant spelling, it is the closest to the current title, but actually used. -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support a move to Yang Luchan per nom but oppose a move to Yang Lu Chan. Wikipedia should follow its own guidelines (WP:PINYIN) and avoid ad hoc romanisations or nonstandard variants. There is no need to se pa rate eve ry sy la ble. — AjaxSmack 02:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support move to Yang Luchan per nom & AjaxSmack. More common than "Yang Lu Chan" in Google News, equally common in Google at large, follows correct Pinyin guidelines, less hostile & confusing to readers. Putting unnecessary spaces in his name contributes to the misconception (seen even in WP:RS [2]) that he is Mr. Chan with the given name Yang Lu. 58.176.246.42 (talk) 10:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.