Talk:Wallingford railway station (England)

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 29 December 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move (non-admin closure) Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 02:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wallingford railway station → Wallingford railway station (England) – This tourist railway station is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over the other two stations of the name. It receives a minority of the article traffic (and less than Wallingford station (Connecticut)), despite being at the base name.[1] It has no greater long-term historical significance, as all three stations are of similar age. Proposed disambiguation follows WP:UKSTATION and the consensus at the recent RfC. Cúchullain ^t/c 18:46, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose There's a "g". --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:02, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That is almost certainly a mistake since the rational for moving the article mentions nothing about changing the spelling of Wallingford so it’s safe to conlcluse that the proposed simply had a typo.--76.65.42.214 (talk) 22:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've now amended the typo, Redrose64 In future please fix these things instead of opposing per them!, It was an obvious typo so the obvious course of action would've been to fix it. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 02:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've been pulled up before for "fixing" this sort of thing when the spelling was intentional, typo or no. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
LOL, yes, it was an obvious typo. Thanks for correcting. The real point here is that this isn't the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bit sad to oppose over an obvious typo.... Anyway support - I would go as far as to say the Conneticut one should be moved to Wallingford railway station as that looks more notable out of the 3 but if a disam is preferred then I don't mind that. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 02:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support In ictu oculi (talk) 10:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.