Talk:WWF WrestleMania 2000 (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Carlton Wilborn (2 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (3 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (25 participants)
TheoTown (11 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Removed Booker-T form game roster, he wasn't even on the WWF payroll at the time. Remember he was still in WCW during these years, he didn't even show up in the WWE video games until Xbox had their RAW series. ~Chaz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.56.195 (talk) 23:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 May 2021

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. BD2412 T 20:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– These wrestling video games are all named after WWE events. However, the disambiguation is insufficient. For example, one would expect WWF WrestleMania 2000 to point to the event (WrestleMania 2000) rather than the video game. 162 etc. (talk) 15:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support the names are very similar to WWE events. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course, I assume the old names would redirect to the PPVs. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that's worth discussing. My preference would be a redirect to the event; not opposed to a dabpage, where both the event and video game are linked. 162 etc. (talk) 18:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I don't have much interest in (or patience for) move requests, but this makes sense to me. The article titles look too much like pay-per-view names, so the qualifier is necessary. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Yeah it creates confusion. Dilbaggg (talk) 12:08, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - If the articles were renamed with the WWF/WWE names (e.g. No Mercy (video game)), I'd approve. Then you'd be disambiguating from the actual article names. It doesn't make sense to disambiguate from a redirect. Plus the events aren't normally referred to with WWF/WWE names attached, whereas they're obviously part of the game titles. --Jtalledo (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As a reader, I'd expect the former terms to redirect to the events, not a related video game per the principle of least astonishment. (not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 03:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - To keep things simple between the products at the time and their video games. Stephen"Zap" (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.