Jump to content

Talk:Voepass

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Passaredo.gif

[edit]

Image:Passaredo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Passaredo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Passaredo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PassaredoLogo1.jpg

[edit]

Image:PassaredoLogo1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passaredo Linhas Aéreas Embraer ERJ-145LU en route from Sao Paulo to Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil

[edit]

Assuming someone is writing this crash up? Substantial damage in runway excursion landing at Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. Registration # PR-PSJ. 35 aboard, no fatalities, plane is a total loss. Occurred 25 AUG 2010 Freelance-writer-editor (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change of name from Passaredo to VoePass

[edit]

On 28OCT2019 the article title was changed from Passaredo Linhas Aéreas to VoePass Linhas Aéreas. However, on 7NOV2019 it was reversed back to Passaredo due to lack of discussion on the talk page, most probably because the name change was made by an editor who was known to a variety of transgressions and later has been suspended; however in this case it was correct. The change of name was extensively published on Brazilian Media: one example can be found here Passaredo anuncia nova marca e nome ao comprar a MAP Linhas Aéreas. If one checks the website of the airline, the new name is clearly stated Voepass. I believe, therefore, that the article should reflect the new name of the airline. (Brunoptsem (talk) 20:12, 15 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 August 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 07:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Voepass Linhas AéreasVoepass – Per WP:COMMONNAME PhotographyEdits (talk) 09:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose I agree with GalacticOrbits. As I have done some searching around Wikipedia, I have found some Brazilian Airlines also ending in "Lineas Aéreas", WP:CONSIST. Voepass also isn't its full name when looking up the airline. This discussion should be fairly evident that Voepass Linhas Aéreas is already good as it is. Enter Your Username Please Choose Another Username (talk) 05:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC) strike sock-- Ponyobons mots 20:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is your vote now, though? Neutral, or support? PhotographyEdits (talk) 22:21, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, this is a tough one: on one side is WP:COMMONNAME, made tempting by the fact that there is no other notable entity named Voepass, as well as international examples such as easyJet, El Al and Qantas. However, there is a long-standing WP:CONSIST convention of using "Linhas Aéreas" (or similar) for airlines in Latin America. If we are to keep "Linhas Aéreas" (that is, keep "Linhas Aéreas"), then I wish to ask where we could clarify the regional article title convention (perhaps one of the relevant subpages in WP:NC or WP:LAT?). --Minoa (talk) 20:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should follow WP:Aviation. Awdqmb (talk) 07:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a WikiProject, not a policy. PhotographyEdits (talk) 07:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:LAT is also a WikiProject. But at least, aviation sector here we have a specific standard to write pages. Yes, it's an unwritten policy, but it's also tradition to consist. Awdqmb (talk) 08:03, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unwritten policy cannot override the written policy. PhotographyEdits (talk) 11:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you really going to tackle every comment whom you don't agree with? Suggest reading WP:BLUDGEON. GalacticOrbits (talk) 12:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of WP:BLUDGEON and I think my comments are reasonable within WP:CIVIL. PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:45, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have just found that, there's no mention in the page, that says airline Voepass use this "Common name", the whole page use "Voepass Linhas Aéreas". I think at least we should change discription first, before we further disguss the page title move.
Awdqmb (talk) 08:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is not needed and can be done afterwards. PhotographyEdits (talk) 11:56, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Per WP:NCCORP, the title of an article should be the one that reliable independent secondary sources most commonly use, which is the case: [1] [2] [3] and [4] to name a few. Per WP:EN, article titles should be in english if there is clearly an established naming usage by english sources, "no matter what name is used by non-English sources," which is the case. The name Voepass is clearly recognizable to an english language Wikipedia, would be the most natural title for those searching and linking the article and the proposed title would be precise and concise since there exists (to my knowledge) no other entity named Voepass. Whilst an english translation to Voepass Airlines could be possible, since there is a clearly established naming usage of the airline, we should follow what english sources most commonly use which is Voepass per WP:TRANSLITERATE. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:31, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Brazil/Transportation in Brazil task force, WikiProject Airlines, WikiProject Companies, and WikiProject Aviation have been notified of this discussion. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 19:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment: Final relist. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Final relist? This is the first relisting. PhotographyEdits (talk) 08:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

We should change the description after the title change.

[edit]

Not mention the previous move request is infact No Consensus (2 Support and 2 Oppose) and closed, done by non-admin user, at least we should change the description in the page.

Yes, there are many media sources suggest the shortened name, then we should find reliable source and add it into the page. Although I Strongly Oppose to just use media description in Wikipedia page. After all we are an professional-direction encyclopedia, not a public news website. Awdqmb (talk) 15:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This not mention I think we should reboot the discussion, or just revert everything before we get a proper consensus. Awdqmb (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, consensus is based on the strength of arguments, not by how many votes were cast by either side. Second of all, you seem to be implying that @BilledMammal: is not competent enough to close the discussion. I wouldn't be so sure considering they look to be a very experienced contributor. Lastly, the discussion ran for two entire weeks. The closing user determined that arguments in favour of a move were stronger. This is "proper consensus". If you want to contest the move, I suggest first discussing this with the closing user. If that's still not enough, I guess the proper venue would be to go to Wikipedia:Move review.
Now regarding the description, in my opinion, I think a simple note should be placed saying that Voepass is more commonly used. I don't think anything else should be changed. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 11:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]