Jump to content

Talk:U District station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleU District station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starU District station is part of the 1 Line (Sound Transit) stations series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 21, 2017Good article nomineeListed
January 28, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Westlake (Link station) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:U District station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 03:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Claiming. Reviewing later.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 03:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's always the concern about the stability of the article, since the station won't be opening anytime soon...

  • "near the University of Washington campus, and is being built as part of the Northgate extension of the Link light rail system." Wouldn't "as part of Link light rail system's Northgate extension"?
    • I think both versions work, but I prefer having the project before system. Most articles use "X Line on Y System".
  • "UW" acronym should be added next to "University of Washington".
    • Green tickY Done.
  • Ref #38 should be archived since it is an expiring link.
    • Green tickY Done.
On stability: the station's construction is pretty much finished and no major changes will probably be done. The article will only need tense updates and a rewritten lead and services section when the opening in 2021 finally comes. SounderBruce 02:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I guess so. I'm going to pass this article, but plenty of things will need to be fixed when the station opens.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 03:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Public art

[edit]

---Another Believer (Talk) 00:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]