Talk:Turkoman invasions of Georgia
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move 6 August 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 07:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Turkmen incursions into Georgia → Turkoman invasions of Georgia – To bring into harmony with other articles about invasions of Georgia. Also the correct name for Qara Qoyunlu and Aq Qoyunlu tribes would be Turkoman, not Turkmen. An emperor /// Ave 18:59, 6 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 06:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Super Ψ Dro 09:37, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
The article does not reflect historical reality
[edit]There is debate on the page we can notice with the many changes above. But we can clearly see that the article was altered by Georgian nationalists because first the article was created for the invasion of Qara Yusuf which was a victory of Turkoman but later they added the Aq qoyunlu who are rivals to the Qaraqoyunlu but the same in the explanations have seen very well that the article is not neutral and impartial because if we take 1 by 1 events,Qara Yusuf defeated the Georgians in the same way for Jahan shah in his 1st invasion he is victorious and the 2nd is without conclusion and not a defeat I invite you to read the biography of the Shah , now analyzing the Aq qoyunlu Uzun Hassan ( Grandfather of İsmail I who is on the Georgian side this is incomprehensible and it is a historical error) was victorious against the Georgian as well for Sufi Khalil beg I invite you to read his page , the Qaraqoyunlu are defeated later by Shah İsmail who is Shah of Iran of origin Turkoman Iranian and Greek the big problem is that are armed is composed of Turkoman also since Shah İsmail betrayed the Georgians and vassalized Georgia also verified all this on the page of Shah İsmail to finish the conclusion the Turkoman are all but defeated one sees very well a war between turkoman and defeats and continuous invasion of Georgia which changes hand passes Turkoman in the majority of cases and also recover some times by the Georgians but the result is all but a Georgian victory it must either be Georgian to say that or it is an absolute no sense. Frenchprotector29 (talk) 12:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)