Talk:Tropical Storm Pakhar (2017)

Tropical Storm Pakhar (2017) was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 11, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (20)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (294)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,059)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,502) • Stub-Class articles (6,667)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (382) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,338)

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Todo

Writing doesn't seem horrible, but Philippines impact probably should have been added before this article was made. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 15:58, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, after some tweaks, it's now C class worthy I think. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 13:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yellow Evan: I guess only thing left is just the top section. Everything else seems fine unless we find new info and I'll keep track on the casualties + damages. Thanks so much YE for your help, and this should definitely be nominated for GA in the near-future. Typhoon2013 (talk) 09:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Should this article move to "Severe Tropical Storm Pakhar (2017)"? --AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 04:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Pakhar (2017)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hylian Auree (talk · contribs) 09:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I will be reviewing this article in the coming days. Before I leave a more extensive assessment of the text, I notice there is an unclear citation style template at the top of the page, so I will start by looking at that:

Inconsistent listing of publishers: be consistent in whether the publishing websites or the full publisher names are used (the latter is preferred). For example, compare ref 1 (noaa.gov) to ref 4 (Japan Meteorological Agency).
Refs 1, 2, 3, 35, 39, and 50 are insufficiently formatted. Please list the publishers of these works and include more descriptive titles. Foreign language sources should indicate which language they are in. Moreover, webcitation is not a publisher; it is merely the website hosting the source.
Newspaper names should be italicized, for example by using the newspaper or work parameter instead of the publisher parameter. Refs 7, 26, 28, 36, 38, 41, 46, 47, and 51 are all articles from newspapers.
Be consistent in whether access-dates are provided for the online sources or not (compare refs 7, 24–43, 45–49, and 51 to the rest of the references).
Please spell out at least the first occasions of abbreviations for agencies, i.e. NDRRMC. Moreover, SCMP should be written out in full as the South China Morning Post newspaper, as per ref 44. Auree ^★★ 09:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

N.B. I am relatively strict in my assessment of the sources. Focus should be on finding a consistent way to note publishers, noting foreign language sources where needed, and listing publishers for all sources. Auree ^★★ 09:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update - I am failing the article given that the above review has been open for nearly a month and there have been no efforts at addressing the comments. Auree ^★★ 18:04, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]