Talk:Titan (Blizzard Entertainment project)

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 October 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (2 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Name of this article

I moved the article back to specify that it is a project. This is both to limit ambiguity (there is already another article for a game titled Titan) and since "Titan" is only confirmed as the project name as opposed to the actual title. If the game is titled Titan in the future, the title of this article will require something to disambiguate from the other game (year, Blizzard, or something else). It will also need to be in italics. Also, please do not forget to adjust the incoming links from other articles where appropriate and do not mark a move as minor. Cptnono (talk) 23:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good call but not only for that; there's always a probability it's not a unique game at all but just a sandbox for new game engine designs. --fs 11:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links

I removed a YouTube video. The uploader was not a reliable source. Although i do not doubt its authenticity, the community has previously been strict regarding such scenarios. It also appears to be a possible copyright issue. We can not link to copyright infringing videos and there is an ID at the lower left which leads me to believe that it was professionally done by another organization. I have not removed the line, though. Anyone know the original source or have an alternate available? Some explanation is in an essay I started: WP:VIDEOLINK

Follow-up: appears to belong to DIRECTV

Also, wiki's and fansites are often not appropriate for the external links section.WP:ELNO Cptnono (talk) 23:56, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly not a subscription MMO

In a quarterly conference call on August 1, 2013 Blizzard stated that it was unlikely to be a subscription based MMORPG "Morhaime hinted at a new direction for the mysterious project, suggesting that it was unlikely to arrive as a subscription based MMORPG" ^[1] . I don't know if it's worth mentioning in the article, I'll leave it to someone more experienced to make that determination. 209.169.244.29 (talk) 17:24, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, nothing is set in stone, so it wouldn't be appropriate for us to report whether something is "likely" or "unlikely". However, thanks for bringing this to our attention! — Richard BB 21:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.pcgamer.com/2013/08/02/blizzards-project-titan-now-unlikely-to-be-a-subscription-mmo/

[1] ttp://www.pcgamer.com/2013/08/02/blizzards-project-titan-now-unlikely-to-be-a-subscription-mmo/

[1]