Talk:Timeline of women's legal rights in the United States (other than voting)

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Long-term block evasion

As is happening on the Timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting) in the 20th century, Timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting), Timeline of reproductive rights legislation, Timeline of women's legal rights in the United States (other than voting) and many others a blocked user who created this article Dante8 is using many accounts and IP addresses to edit these articles going back years. Just check the edit history of this article and go back, it is all the same blocked user. Most edits on this article since 2016 have been made by this blocked user.

72.94.88.14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who has obsessively edited this article is the same IP as 100.34.237.4
100.34.237.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), this IP is the blocked account DoesWhateverASpiderCant
DoesWhateverASpiderCant (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), DoesWhateverASpiderCant is clearly the same account MauveCricket
MauveCricket (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), before this account this user was using the blocked IP 173.15.179.229
173.15.179.229 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), before that in 2020-2021, this user was using the blocked IP 100.11.62.135
100.11.62.135 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), before this IP, this user has used many other blocked IPs on this article including
2600:1002:B025:2B31:BD2C:43:3EB2:E6BC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), they have used about 10 other IPS in this range, they also used
71.224.248.19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), before that this user was using the blocked account CobblersChildren
CobblersChildren (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), before this account the same user was using the blocked account
SesameStreetCred (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), before this blocked account they were using the blocked account JaneSwifty in 2017 and 2016
76.98.184.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), an IP used in 2016, about 20 more could be cited.
JaneSwifty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), blocked sock-puppet of Dante8 who created the article.

All these IPs trace to the exact same location and the editing pattern, style and editing hours are the same. There is no doubt this is all the same user who created this article. This is long-term abuse that is happening on many timeline articles related to women's rights. Again, all the above can easily be found in the editing history just scroll back to 2019 and 2020, i.e. [1] and it goes way back to before 2017 [2] to the page creation in 2016 by JaneSwifty [3]. There needs to be page protection on these articles. Psychologist Guy (talk) 00:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SigurdsSister (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), same user is still evading their block and editing this article. I have filed an SPI here Psychologist Guy (talk) 21:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

Can someone add a citation needed tag to the claim that California gave women the right to wear pants to work in 1959? Can't find that corroborated anywhere else and the paragraph just cites the relevant law (originally from 1959) and forms. I'm not certain that the law as it stands today was entirely the same as it was in 1959, and if you search you can find a 1990s measure in California that apparently does the same thing. I think it might have been a later addition, and would like to see a secondary source talk about the history of that fair housing law.

Elaboration Station (talk) 23:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]