Jump to content

Talk:Tianjin Metro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Excessive Information

[edit]

This article contains excessive information of uncertainty. Some of the lines listed here, as far as I know, probably wouldn't be completed before 2025. Apparently it was edited by some officially sponsored zealots whom were to keen at bloating their mass transit networks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.151.91.1 (talk) 08:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


What it needs is a chart for organizing its future plans like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou's metros. Besides, there is nothing zealous with talking about the metro system's plans for expansion all the before mentioned systems have entries on their long term plans and proposals. Terramorphous 05:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This Article is Shit and Needs to be Rewritten

[edit]

Especially the criticism part. Who the hell pasted that in? An article of this length should not have 2 references. Also, it seems that the article was translated from Chinese using Google Translate, or something.

Criticism Section Plagiarised

[edit]

It was almost entirely copied from a forum post I made nearly 4 years ago. You can see the original here: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=361420


Suggestion on restructuring the metro network description

[edit]

There are nine planned metro lines. I have added the missing ones and grouped them, as second-level headings, under a first-level heading of 'Long Term Plan', since a layout of the network is only one aspect of a metro system. It's also more consistent with other first-level headings (history, etc), structurally speaking. Zhengjp 06:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


First line stations

[edit]

It says original first line had 8 stations, and 13 have been constructed. How does that make it 22? Koterpillar (talk) 16:54, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English quality in 1/2 price ticket section

[edit]

This section in particular looks auto translated. It is mostly unreadable. G.turner (talk) 09:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]