Jump to content

Talk:Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Thiruvengadam Temple)

Requested move 27 April 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 01:55, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Venkateshvara TempleSri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Tirumala – The present name Venkateswara Temple is not correct as it is not a common name, but a generic name. There are hundreds of such temples across the state of Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Tamilnadu and other locations across the world. I give few examples for which articles exist in Wikipedia already: Venkateswara Temple, Dwaraka Tirumala, Venkateswara Temple, Minnesota and Venkateswara Temple, Ramenahalli. As a person born and brought up in Andhra Pradesh, the Indian state in which the temple exists, the temple is more commonly referred as Tirupati, Tirupati Konda (meaning Tirumala hill). So in this context, the official name of "Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple", along with location "Tirumala" is more appropriate. (Click on Temples tab of Official website to see the official name) Arjunaraoc (talk) 09:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose your proposal, but would be inclined to support Venkateshvara Temple, Tirumala. Chronikhiles (talk) 17:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment: A move away from the current title and to Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala/Venkateshvara Temple, Tirumala seems supported, but there is no consensus for which spelling of "Venkateswara" or "Venkateshvara" should be used. Further discussion on the spelling is encouraged. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support "Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala", as it is the official spelling as per TTD website cited in previous discussion. Arjunaraoc (talk) 09:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala" should be the page name as per WP:COMMONNAME. Even TTD, the official management group of Tirupati temple always uses Venkateswara. Reo kwon (talk) 10:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Alleged alteration of origin of the word "Tiru" to Dravidian instead of Tamil. Why do you want to live in false pride?

[edit]

Hello all, I would like to raise a concern about the recent modification made to the article on Tirumala, where it is stated that Tirumala is of Dravidian origin. I believe this change is inaccurate and needs to be re-evaluated. Historically, the term "Tiru" (meaning "sacred" or "holy") is a widely recognized Tamil word and is frequently used in Tamil place names, religious contexts, and literature. It is deeply rooted in Tamil culture and tradition. While Dravidian culture encompasses several languages and regions, attributing the origin of the name Tirumala solely to "Dravidian" rather than recognizing its strong Tamil connection dilutes its specific cultural significance. The original content accurately reflected this connection, and the recent change seems to overlook the historical and linguistic importance of the Tamil language in this context. Manipulating historical and cultural facts can mislead readers and disrupt the authenticity of the information. It is essential to present accurate and well-researched data, and I urge the editors to revert the article to its previous version, acknowledging the Tamil origin of "Tiru" and the cultural significance it holds. I encourage open discussion and fact-based contributions, but we must ensure that regional or personal pride does not distort the truth. Let's preserve the integrity of history and respect the cultural heritage that these names and places hold. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sroheethicloud (talk) 07:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see mention of the word "Dravidian" in the article prose. What's the concern exactly? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don’t see it now, because I restored it. Someone had recently modified it with incorrect information. The sanctity has been restored. BhajaGovindam (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
can you provide a diff? I don't see that you've edited the page before. Eucalyptusmint (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have provided with sufficient references and citations to maintain the sanctity and historical accuracy. Thank you. BhajaGovindam (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fylindfotberserk I think this editor is talking about "the recent modification made to the article on Tirumala" - so, most likely edit here Asteramellus (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Asteramellus: Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sroheethicloud: Obviously you are in another article's talk page. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Fylindfotberserk for keeping the history as it is. BhajaGovindam (talk) 16:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]