Talk:The Scarecrow (children's book)

Did you know nomination

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that The Scarecrow, considered the first major work of children's literature in China, has parallels with the works of Andersen, Pushkin, and Wilde?

• Source: Andersen: Farquhar, Mary Ann (1999). Children's Literature in China: From Lu Xun to Mao Zedong. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-47507-1.

Pushkin: Bi, Lijun (2013). "China's Patriotic Exposé: Ye Shengtao's Fairytale, Daocao ren [Scarecrow]". Bookbird. 51 (2): 32–38. doi:10.1353/bkb.2013.0038.

Wilde: Wong, Linda (2004). "Oscar Wilde's Literary Influence in Modern China". The Wildean (24): 46–58. JSTOR 45269230.

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/WSJV

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 729 past nominations.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC).

• This isn't a review, more of a query, but is there only one source that verifies the "first major work of children's literature in China" claim? That's a rather exceptional claim, so it would be better if there were multiple sources suggesting it rather than just Bi. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• Narutolovehinata5 I looked it up and I could only find the article in searches. Children's literature by Sun Yuxiu is older and I could see it as being the first major work of children's literature in China for starting the trend - "In 1908, the first collection of fairy tales (Tonghua) edited by Sun Yuxiu (1903-1936) was published by Shanghai Commercial Press, symbolizing the earliest children’s reading materials (Zhu 2013: 117)." SL93 (talk) 00:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

• Hi Narutolovehinata5 and SL93. I've expanded a bit, with reference to other sources. Sun Yuxiu's publication was a translation ("Among the 102 works included in the collection, however, two thirds were translated from other languages while the remaining were edited stories about the Chinese history. Therefore, it was the translated literature from the West that played the dominant role in the late Qing dynasty."), whereas the sources put greater emphasis on the originality of Ye's literary product. If you are still uncomfortable with Bi's assessment, "first modern collection of fairy tales" or "first collection of Chinese fairy tales" are both supported by sources. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

• Crisco 1492 I would be fine with "first modern collection of fairy tales" or "first collection of Chinese fairy tales". I can start reviewing the article once we hear back from Narutolovehinata5. SL93 (talk) 00:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Sure. Adding ALT. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

• ALT1 ... that The Scarecrow, considered the first collection of Chinese fairy tales, has parallels with the works of Andersen, Pushkin, and Wilde?

I would be fine with whatever the sources support. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. I approve ALT1. SL93 (talk) 01:52, 30 December 2024 (UTC)