Jump to content

Talk:The Mummy (franchise)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge section content into full article

[edit]

The content of the Cast and characters section should be merged into the full article entitled List of characters in The Mummy series.12.196.210.18 (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

adventure film?

[edit]

is horror a sub-genre of adventure? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.180.61.58 (talk) 09:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split off the Scorpion King franchise

[edit]

I suggest that The Scropion King — The Mummy franchise be split off, since it is notable by itself, and is independent of the other films listed here, and a clearly linked together set of spin-offs and sequels. 184.144.163.245 (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. If a separate article would made, it wouldn't have much depth at all. After all, The Scorpion King spin-offs are only made up of one theatrically-released movie and one direct-to-DVD sequel so far. I do not call that notability. Byakuya Truelight (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The nominator says "The Scorpion King - The Mummy" I suppose this means the six movies (Mummy 1,2,3, Scorpion King 1,2,3) Certainly those are separate and separatable from the rest of the content on this article. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 06:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In that case I have no preference one way or the other, but if that's what the nominator means, then the heading they used for this section is rather unclear. Byakuya Truelight (talk) 08:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why have the Scorpion King movies been removed from this article? They're a part of the franchise. Byakuya Truelight (talk) 18:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:510ohqi+V2L.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:510ohqi+V2L.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:57, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two questions

[edit]
  1. . Can the box office amounts and the critical reception figures be added to this page?
  2. . Should the Scorpion King franchise be at the same level as the Stephen Sommers franchise, or a subsection of it? Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 04:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly is the Hammer series part of Universals franchise?

[edit]

Either this article should be about the Universal franchise, or about Mummies in film.★Trekker (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Was wondering that myself. Unless Hammer asked Universal for a special license for base their film directly on the Universal films. I fail to see the connection. Thus I removed the Hammer films.DoctorHver (talk) 03:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 August 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved back to the original title, The Mummy (franchise). —usernamekiran (talk) 21:28, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]



The Mummy (Universal film franchise)The Mummy (Universal Pictures film franchise) – Since the disambiguation is using the company name, it should use the actual name as Universal is a disambiguation page. Gonnym (talk) 10:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.