Jump to content

User talk:DoctorHver

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article List of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer cartoon Studio Complete Filmography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely outsourced list. No lede. No evidence of basis for use of the word 'complete' in title.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Struway2. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Paul Scholes that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Domestic technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One-game playoff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of radio stations in Iceland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selfoss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

3D film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Walt Disney Studio and Universal
Radio format (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Eclectic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom and Jerry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, What Should I Do?, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "What Should I Do?" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Outline of film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Handheld Game template?

[edit]

I was going to say, what you should probably consider is creating a new template for handheld games since that seems to be the only template missing from the group of templates. Sub groupings in the template should probably be electronic handhelds (classic led and LCD games from the 70s and 80s, which don't classify as video games and correlates with the article of the same name, handheld electronic game) and actual handheld game consoles (handheld game console). --Marty Goldberg (talk) 15:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

nintendo handheld console reverse

[edit]

hello i noticed you reversed the content of list of Nintendo handheld consoles. i reverted that because in this case it is more practical to have nintendo ds lines at the top. if you want to talk come to my talk pageSeanbobe's cat (talk)August 2013

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Johnny Tremain (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Shorts-d--1960ies.htm</ref> Both were originally shown on Disney´s anthology TV series in 1958)<ref>Wonderful World of Disney Television by Bill Cotter Supplemental material</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Old-time radio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[http://otrrlibrary.org/ Old Time Radio library reaserch]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the speedy delete tag that you added to the article as the reason you stated in the talk page is not a valid reason for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Please take the article to AfD or proposed deletion if you wish to pursue deletion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how that is done, could propse a deletion on my behalf or leave me with enough information which tags I should use to propse a deletion. DoctorHver (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the instructions on listing an article under Articles for Deletion and for Proposed Deletion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:30, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
thank you, DoctorHver (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Walt Disney's World War II productions for Armed Forces may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:32, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl 50 page move

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Super Bowl L a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Super Bowl 50. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marvel Productions may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *''[[G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (1985 TV series)|G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero]]'' (1985) )TV series)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saban Entertainment, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rescue Me, Gotcha and Taken (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of My Life as a Teenage Robot episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.Bettering the Wiki (talk) 06:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of My Life as a Teenage Robot episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 00:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Terrytoons Animated shorts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Terry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add list of shows back on the 20th Television and Warner Bros. TV Distribution pages

[edit]

wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Warner_Bros._Television_Distribution&oldid=628241627

wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=20th_Television&oldid=628709327

and some Trvialist likes King Shadeed and they are bad users and delete my edits the all the time.

Harman and Ising

[edit]

The reason your edit to the Harman and Ising article was reverted is because it contains too many unencylopedic typos and is not backed by a verifiable citation. Please make the appropriate corrections and providing a verifiable linked citation before attempting to reinsert the material. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Måns

[edit]

Please take a look at the article Måns Zelmerlöw. For any improvements, any edit is welcomed :)--BabbaQ (talk) 21:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I don't care about that singer. DoctorHver (talk) 22:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matt Busby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Murphy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

[edit]

Information icon I noticed that you have posted information to the page Tintin (character) in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English. This is so that information may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the information. In addition, all information added to Wikipedia must come from reliable sources and have necessary citations. If you can, please make these corrections to this page. Thank you. If you need any assistance or have comments or questions, you are welcome to reply to me below or on my Talk page. Prhartcom (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dino Babies#Irish or American

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Dino Babies#Irish or American. Thanks. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also

[edit]

I'm not sure what was confusing about my edit summary, but I'll try explaining again: Your See also additions here and here are not consistent with WP:SEEALSO. Unless it's for something obvious like "List of Peanuts characters", which are obviously related to Peanuts, you need to include an explanation for why we're "seeing also".

  • Lee Mendelson Films - Other films produced by Lee Mendelson, the producer of the Peanuts specials

...or whatever your rationale is for including these links. Also, "See also" should be formatted in sentence case, not lower case.

Please restore when you're ready to explain why you're including these links. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IF you need explanation, Lee Mendelson Films and Melendez Films, both companies are responsible for producing Peanuts specials, the TV series and all the 2-D films. ONlything they did not produce are the video games, and the upcoming 3-d film, and probably some of the documentaries. the filmography doesn't explain much about the producer as I think filmography should always bring you back to the actor or the producer or the studio that made the films in question. But the real problem is the fact if you clicked on the articles Lee Mendelson Films doesn't explain much just repeats the large majority of the filmography. So comparing and merge the two might be wiser. Melendez Films actually has some text written but needs better sourcing should be kept on. Lee Mendelson films doesn'T list any filmogrpahy on its website, and everything Peanuts relaated seems to be listed on Melendez films website. I would think that these are one of the same company . DoctorHver (talk) 22:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the FA Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Frees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moby Duck. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FilmFair and DHX Media

[edit]

Hi, thanks for converting List of FilmFair (UK) programs into a redirect. I assume you created it before realizing that the FilmFair article already has a more detailed list. Maybe you also didn't realize that List of DHX Media programs is a list of all DHX Media properties, including both acquisitions and original programming. This is a completely appropriate and relevant list to link to from the FilmFair article. The lead section of List of DHX Media programs explains unambiguously what its scope is. The FilmFair article already has two links to the main DHX Media article in the body and in the infobox. I'm going to restore the FilmFair article one more time. There is no need for an edit war. Now that you know the situation, thank you for understanding. —Ringbang (talk) 21:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I would argue that DHX Media Programs list still needs, cleanup as its impossible to say from that article if shows listed on that article where originally produced by DHX Media or not or if DHX has current distribution rights to these or not. DoctorHver (talk) 01:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Woody Woodpecker Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syndication. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of television series based on Marvel Comics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madhouse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, DoctorHver. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Trivialist (talk) 02:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pirates of the Caribbean into List of Disney video games. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of tv series based on video games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Philadelphia Experiment

[edit]

Template:Philadelphia Experiment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DC films / DCEU debate

[edit]

Hi

I've raised a thing for mediation about the ongoing dispute about this template. Hopefully get this sorted one way or another

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Template_talk:DC_Comics_films.23DC_Cinematic_Universe

Brooza (talk) 16:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alice in Wonderland: A Lesson in Appreciating Differences listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alice in Wonderland: A Lesson in Appreciating Differences. Since you had some involvement with the Alice in Wonderland: A Lesson in Appreciating Differences redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of marvel films' listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of marvel films'. Since you had some involvement with the List of marvel films' redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confeeration cup listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Confeeration cup. Since you had some involvement with the Confeeration cup redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wii Ugames listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Wii Ugames. Since you had some involvement with the List of Wii Ugames redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:38, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TOON DISNEY STUDIO listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TOON DISNEY STUDIO. Since you had some involvement with the TOON DISNEY STUDIO redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Mouse Slim listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mickey Mouse Slim. Since you had some involvement with the Mickey Mouse Slim redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

[edit]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=3dz0m2ubQw1KSnb_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_6tVe9Gk8Tb7e1St&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, btw don't edit much polictally focused wiki articles but I do follow politics in general DoctorHver (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

[edit]

Information icon Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to List of superhero television series. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at List of superhero television series, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Template:DC Comics films.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Screen Gems. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. King Shadeed (talk) 18:31, October 26, 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DoctorHver. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Sherlock Holmes list

[edit]

I saw that you were somewhat active on List of actors who have played Sherlock Holmes and I have begun creating a similar list for actors who have played Dr. Watson at List of actors who have played Dr. Watson. I am currently working on it and I was wondering if you had some time if you would be willing to tackle it with me. It will be a rather large project for one person. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 20:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DONALD tump listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DONALD tump. Since you had some involvement with the DONALD tump redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of accidents involving sports teams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at X-Men (film series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- AlexTW 08:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dr. Seuss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Cannon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DoctorHver. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DoctorHver. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Temple:Project Shadowchaser listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Temple:Project Shadowchaser. Since you had some involvement with the Temple:Project Shadowchaser redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 22:00, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of longest-running United States television series

[edit]

Subject: Scooby-Doo on List of longest-running United States television series

Scooby-Doo counts as one continuous program because it is presented as such. Star Trek does not because each show there is presented as it's own series. That's why Scooby-Doo stays on the list. It has been included on the list for years now, and I was not the person who added it. As such, please do not remove it again unless a clear consensus is found on the talk page.

Thank you. dreiss2 (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C.O.R.E. article needs fixing up

[edit]

Hi, can you do me a favor, please? The C.O.R.E. article on Wikipedia is missing year dates regarding films, TV shows and video games as well as company names missing links to their articles and should have slashes and round brackets inbetween the company names. ArthurRead1976 (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do I get anything in return?DoctorHver (talk) 19:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"ToonTime ...In the classroom" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ToonTime ...In the classroom. Since you had some involvement with the ToonTime ...In the classroom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Private Snafu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Hitch in Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King Kong in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mighty Joe Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Classic Horror moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Universal Classic Horror, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

oh...thanks. Well If you read the talk page on https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Universal_Classic_Monsters#Proposal_to_pair_down_the_list_of_%22classic%22_films_to_those_released_under_the_%22Monsters%22_banner you will understand what this article is supposed to include every film released under the Universal classic Horror banner that were not part of the core Universal classic monsters films as films are related but separate. As that IP on the talk page doesn't provide any valid source that the films that belong under the Universal classic monster banners are indeed ca 43 films not ca 30 films so I choose to reduce that original list to films that were actually released under that Universal classic monster banner as they were according to recent DVD's and Blu-rays releases https://www.amazon.com/Universal-Classic-Monsters-Complete-Collection/dp/B07DKY35N5/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3P626VNO0CAIR&keywords=universal+classic+monsters+complete+30-film+collection+blu-ray&qid=1579891047&sprefix=Universal+classic+mon%2Caps%2C281&sr=8-1 and list everything else the not released under that Monster banner on Universal Classic Horror as the IP does imply that Universal Picture also Used that banner for films that were horror related but did not include the core monsters. As I cannot find those sources that are valid that would confirm the existence of that second banner i.e Universal Classic Horror for time being, i'm fine with leaving this on a draft page for now. But on the original Universal Classic Monster page I intend to add a section about various DVD and Blu-ray releases. Just prevent that other editors don't start to re-add those films I just removed from there I dream of horses DoctorHver (talk) 18:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spy film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingsman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fitness for Living

[edit]

Fitness for Living is completely unsourced and the only mention is on Wikia and even there it's marked [citation needed]. Any proof for its existence? TryKid[dubiousdiscuss] 23:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does exist https://d23.com/a-to-z/fitness-for-living-film/ and here is someone selling copy one of the films https://www.ebay.com/itm/16mm-Fitness-for-Living-What-is-Physical-Fitness-Walt-Disney-Educational-400-/362623437288 however when it comes generally to these Disney educational films just not this particular educational series fitness for Living. Information on various Disney educational films are few and far between so official site like d23 doesn't offer much on them nether does the book Disney A to Z: The Official Encyclopedia so all that tells me Disney did not keep a proper track on these educational films they have produced since their official published records offer little one them and various secondary sources by various independent film historians don´t offer much either. I once went through a list of over 100s of these films and I didn't find any valid information about whether some of them were actually made, for others, I could find limited information that they were indeed produced but the information on them was so inadequate it was impossible to tell what they were actually about. On maybe only 10% of these films I could find proper information about them or I could find the films themselves on Youtube or on Vimeo or Dailymotion the list of these films can be found on the following websites: https://www.bcdb.com/cartoons/Walt_Disney_Studios/Shorts/Educational/ and https://web.archive.org/web/20160401230520/http://disneyshorts.org/miscellaneous/educational.aspx be forwarned there some disparity between these lists they were not compiled from the same source it seems. but I have no idea what information these website used to creates these lists DoctorHver (talk) 00:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Cartoon Network Studios. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 20:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Billy and Mandy never had a seventh season

[edit]

Haven’t you heard? The 2003 episodes were ALSO made for Grim and Evil, not for the standalone series in mind.

You just messed up the episode guide. Maxwell Atoms did confirm that there was no seventh season of Billy and Mandy, because of the 2003 episodes. ChowderRulez (talk) 21:58, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Megamaid" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Megamaid. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 28#Megamaid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lord of The Rings - The Hobbit" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lord of The Rings - The Hobbit. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 25#Lord of The Rings - The Hobbit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 01:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DoctorHver. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Universal Classic Horror".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Mickey Mouse Silm" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mickey Mouse Silm. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 13#Mickey Mouse Silm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Bond in video games, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Interplay and Mindscape.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tarzan in film, television and other non-print media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Parsons.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How about you read the notice on top of Democracy Index talk page

[edit]

That notice was put specifically because so many people tried to change the index when thar misses the whole point. That article is specifically about the report produced by the Economist Intelligence Unit, so any index other than the one done by EUI doesn't belong there. Changing the index is misrepresenting what EUI said.


And FYI, monarchies can be democracies, because in democratic countries the monarchs aren't being dictators over the entire political system, it's the democratic institutions that does the governing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:60CC:C900:D444:14B0:5C01:4BA7 (talk) 14:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

I note that, while you have been editing at Wikipedia for over 11 years, you do not seem to have grasped the concept of the edit summary. You consistently put something in the edit summary box, but it is almost always meaningless (often just a single character). Please learn to use the edit summary box properly.WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted your question about edit summary, because you forgot your signature with that question, so I thought at first that was some IP edit, and I think you are free to remove IP edits from your talk page if they don't sound legit. I was about to restore it and I put your signature on it if thats ok, when you made this complant with the noticeboard. But if you feel better I have restored your question and put your signature on it if you are fine with that. But some time ago, I was altering my settings on my profile and for some reason when I was done, I couldn't publish any edits unless I give edit summary. I wasn't to sure what to do in the settings to fix the problem, So because of that i became used to making this annoying 1 letter summaries. Personally I find this annoying that I cannot do edits without having to do edit summaries, but most epdits I try to do should be self explainatory. If they need explaination I do an proper edit summary on them. So if any admin or mod could know what I should be looking at in mysettings to fix this problem it would be great.DoctorHver (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

[edit]

I note that a good part of your recent contribution to Wikipedia has been the refactoring of various lists of movies about historical or mythical figures. I also note that you have not discussed these refactoring changes with anyone. Since Wikipedia is built on consensus, it might be a good idea to get some input from the community on these changes. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:DoctorHver and edit summaries. The discussion is about the topic Edit summaries. Thank you.--WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted your question about edit summary, because you forgot your signature with that question, so I thought at first that was some IP edit, and I think you are free to remove IP edits from your talk page if they don't sound legit. I was about to restore it and I put your signature on it if thats ok, when you made this complant with the noticeboard. But if you feel better I have restored your question and put your signature on it if you are fine with that. But some time ago, I was altering my settings on my profile and for some reason when I was done, I couldn't publish any edits unless I give edit summary. I wasn't to sure what to do in the settings to fix the problem, So because of that i became used to making this annoying 1 letter summaries. Personally I find this annoying that I cannot do edits without having to do edit summaries, but most epdits I try to do should be self explainatory. If they need explaination I do an proper edit summary on them. So if any admin or mod could know what I should be looking at in mysettings to fix this problem it would be great. DoctorHver (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of college bowl games

[edit]

Do you mind reverting on List of college bowl games? I don't want to go over 3RR. Thanks, Idan (talk) 23:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but maybe you should actually ask some admin to block IPs form editing. DoctorHver (talk) 23:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should have explained myself better. Not your edit obviously. Thanks anyway. Idan (talk) 23:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of disaster films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 22:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of space opera media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buck Rogers in the 25th Century.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm VeryRarelyStable. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Thor: Ragnarok have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. —VeryRarelyStable 03:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus is we don't name the dead or survivors of aviation disasters unless they have a WP article. Here are just some of the many discussions-

Plus see ANI discussions here[1] and here[2]. Most of those discussions took place in the last two years. There is one exception- the cockpit crew of the aircraft involved....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please don't add random bare URLs at the end of articles. We also have guidelines on what links should be included. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:00, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The former guy" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The former guy. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 16#The former guy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"List of films set in ancient Greece" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of films set in ancient Greece. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 20#List of films set in ancient Greece until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Thedefender35. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of war films and TV specials without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thedefender35 14:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Thedefender35. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of war films and TV specials have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thedefender35 15:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sports

[edit]

Hi i am currently working on Draft:List of most expensive sports films just wondering if ypu want to give me a hand P+T Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 10:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of feature film series with two entries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Quiet Place.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Babe (video game)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Babe (video game). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 25#Babe (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Count Dracula in popular culture. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please do not remove and re-insert content from an article. You have been doing this repeatedly today, and it appears disruptive.The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 14:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hum, not sure what this warning is about, but re-organizing a list article can hardly been called unconstructive or experimental, or vandalism specially since no content was permentely removed. But I can probably agree its probably not the best method of moving things around, i.e copy, delete, and paste. Its better to edit the article on the whole, but considering how big the article is I just wanted to ensure I was moving correct catagory around each time. I didn't want copy part of another catagory by accident, as scrolling down while copying can sometimes result lot of more content being higlighted than intended. I would prefer if wikipedia offered some easier method of moving pre-existing content around in an articles, by jut clicking on TOC list (if it exist) and move the things around there. With that said I'm going to argue that flows of articles x in popular culture and similar named articles always flow better if similar Media Adaptations in similar mediums are keept as close to each other as possible. Screen mediums like film and TV (including both animation and Live-action) stage plays are related to those but they are not screen media unless they are recorded and then they can be screened as ether TV or feature film. I would probably list them before any screen adaptions as earliest stage play when adapted usually (not always) predates any screen adaptions. Sound only mediums such as Audio, radio and music. Print media, such as literature and comics. The games and video games considering how interactive those mediums are, and finally anything else that don't fit elsewhere. Another reason I see for organizing article like this is the fact that not every one browsing these articles might be doing so for the same reason someone could only be intrested in screen adaptions of a particular work while someone else might be only looking for print media adaptions. DoctorHver (talk) 18:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Part of the problem is that you left no edit summary, so all I could figure was you were removing content in one edit and then pasting it back in with the next. A second problem is you don't need to save in between the copy & paste. There's no reason to do so and it just fills the edit log with extra changes.
Another is that there's no real manual of style saying that articles need rearranged like this. I can appreciate wanting things to "make sense," but there's going to be disagreement among various users as to what actually does make sense for these orders.
So, given this is a misunderstanding, I'll strike through the vandalism warning. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 18:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, I do agree edit summaries should probably be more used specially if someine is moving stuff around, thats why I think wikipedia should offer an edit tool that can do that, more easily than a copy/paste (cut) protocool as I hate moving content around this way. But I'm glad you can appreciate that I want to make articles flow make sense, and I do agree there is no established order, but when it comes to lists that deals with adaptations of orignal work I have notice that things are very diffrent in articles that deal with works that are in public domain compared to those that are still under copyright. In the former its often more hard to make more sense of adaptions invidually in than the later and it doesn't seems to matter whether its film, TV, stage, audio etc while in the later things are more in order an easier to navigate. I would like to think that most folks looking at these type of articles are probaly most looking for film and TV adaptiations so I would argue that at minimum those two catagories should be keept as close to one another regardless of anything else. DoctorHver (talk) 21:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cameos or minor appearences does not make something an instalmet in a franchise. Jungle Book note.

[edit]

See for example Template:Spider-Man films which does not include Captain America: Civil War or any of the Avengers films. Also, you forgot to add italics to the films title. And don't add capitalization to random words on templates, that's not how you're supposed to do it.★Trekker (talk) 19:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not trying to start an edit war, Explain the following wikitable copy pasted stright from List of Firefly (film series) characters Which Include The Haunted World of El Superbeasto:
Character House of 1000 Corpses The Devil's Rejects The Haunted World of
El Superbeasto
3 from Hell
2003 2005 2009 2019
Captain Spaulding
Johnny Lee “Cutter” Johns
Sid Haig
Otis B. Driftwood Bill Moseley
Vera-Ellen "Baby" Firefly / Suzi-X Sheri Moon Zombie
Dr. Satan
S. Quentin Quale
Walter Phelan Walter PhelanUCD Paul Giamatti  
Tiny Firefly Matthew McGrory
Walter PhelanY
Matthew McGrory  
Lieutenant George Wydell Tom Towles  
Gloria "Mama" Firefly Karen Black Leslie Easterbrook  
Rufus "R.J." Firefly Robert Allen Mukes Tyler Mane  
Mary Knowles Jennifer Jostyn Unknown ActressUP  
Rondo / Boss Rico   Danny Trejo
Morris Green   Daniel Roebuck
Sheriff John Quincey Wydell   William Forsythe   Mentioned
Charlie Altamont / Luke St. Luke   Ken Foree  
Jimmy / Murray the Robot   Brian Posehn  
Roy Sullivan / Lenny Crumpski   Geoffrey Lewis  
Velvet Von Black   Rosario DawsonUCD Rosario Dawson  
El Superbeasto / George Glass   Tom Papa
Trixie / Greta   Dee Wallace
Hugo Firefly Dennis Fimple  
Earl Firefly
The Professor
Jake McKinnon  
Denise Willis Erin Daniels  
Bill Hudley Rainn Wilson  
Jerry Goldsmith Chris Hardwick  
Deputy Steve Naish Walton Goggins  
Don Willis Harrison Young  
Officer Ray Dobson   Dave Sheridan  
Gloria Sullivan   Priscilla Barnes  
Billy Ray Snapper   Diamond Dallas Page  
Dr. Bankhead   Duane Whitaker  
Joe Cthulhu   Clint Howard  
Gerard the Exterminator   Harland Williams  
Bennie Rodriguez   Carlos Alazraqui  
Winslow "Foxy" Coltrane   Richard Brake
Warden Virgil Dallas Harper   Jeff Daniel Phillips
Aquarius   Emilio Rivera

Then the actual temple, which then don't include it: That is disparity betwen the two far as i'm concerned if The Haunted World of El Superbeasto is supposed to be connected to Firefly then the actual temple should also include link to that film as well rather than no link, if Its not supposed to be connected then the above table needs to be fixed, and EL Superbeasto removed other wise the two will just confuse readers. So I was trying to establish parity between the two. If it came of as and edit war then I do applogy.

with that said plenty of templates that have related section, even if some of the stuff included in them vague or questionable connection.

Regarding Jungle Book, *Elephant Boy (1937) is not Mowgli story, so it shouldn't included with the Mowgli films, as thats confusing. There are also two Chuck Jones special that are not based on Mowgli stories, but are not included of course in the template because they don't have any articles on Wikipedia they are The White Seal (1975), Rikki-Tikki-Tavi (1975) and would slot fine with Elephant Boy if they had an article. Since the temple starts with books section, followed by Mowgli stories followed by other stories, so it would flow more natural in the adaption section if we had adaptions of Mowgli stories seperate from adaptations of other stories. The only problem here is what to do with the Disney stuff, since they were given their own giant subsection which actually doesn't make the templete look rather odd, and if the template is not supposed to be about the Disney Franchie then obviously it needs to removed (and perhaps recreated as its own seperate Template) since the work didn't originate with Disney. SO I think that the The Disney Adaptations shouldn't be given more weight than other adaptions of Mowgli stories. But I don't know particularly about Jungle Book but its been known that Disney Adaptions of external works are often some of the most unfaithful to the original work, Pinocchio is a good example. DoctorHver (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the original research nonsense from the list of characters, that was added only a couple of months ago and was first reveted by a trusted editor, but then added back by an IP. At most the animated film can be listed on an "See also" or "Related" section, it should not be given prominese as if it was an actual instalment in the series. As for the Jungle Book, my point was that you shouldn't edit the sections as if they were headlines with capitalized words.★Trekker (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I give the error table a strike through since it was fixed in the main article. With that said I'm always on the option when it comes to connecting films together there should always been some form of offical statement or publication that establish such fact, whether its original author or publisher. If noting of such note exist, then its just anyone is guessing game which probably what happened in that orignal research. Thus cameos shouldn't connect diffrent franchies/films together into one franchies/film series specially if those cameos are not even a speaking one (not sure if that was the case with Firely/Superbasterdo (as I have not seen any of these films)). As for Jungle Book I see your point now, but with that said the Disney section needs to go(since the templete isn't about Disney, same with any other tamplate that does this where the work didn't originate with Disney) so it owuld be better if adaptions part would be divided into Mowgli adaptions and then adaptions of other stories. DoctorHver (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

[edit]

Hi, DoctorHver. I'd like to politely raise a concern about the link at the top of your userpage. WP:UP#NOT advises: there is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute, or which is likely to give widespread offense (emphasis omitted), and it's my view that your link to Transgenderism: the great delusion of our time, which compares trans rights to witch hunts and alien abductions and challenges the doctrine ... that 'transphobia' is a most grievous transgression, does qualify as "likely to give widespread offense." I know that I'm personally offended, so there's one step toward "widespread". I imagine that most of Category:Transgender Wikipedians and Category:Non-binary Wikipedians would be offended as well, with 472 editors between them as of this writing, and likely hundreds more who've declined to categorize themselves.

As such, I would politely request that you remove the link from your userpage. If you want to indicate your alignment with beliefs like Patrick West's, there are ways to do so without appearing to endorse an essay that brands many of our editors as living a "delusion". -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 17:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice about the gender area

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 17:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tango & Cash Addition

[edit]

I'm wondering if your adding Tango & Cash to the Beverly Hills Cop (franchise) was done in error.

Orphaned non-free image File:DisneyTreasures08-Anette .jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DisneyTreasures08-Anette .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DisneyTreasures08-donald4.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DisneyTreasures08-donald4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dr.Syn, Alias The Scarecrow .jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dr.Syn, Alias The Scarecrow .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films based on video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mind Candy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

[edit]

Information icon It appears that you copied or moved text from Lou Gehrig Memorial Award to List of Major League Baseball awards. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 01:39, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, editing baseball articles are not my strong suit, so I generally don't edit these articles. However it was surprising that the List of Major League Baseball awards did not include Lou Gehrig Memorial Award an annual award first awarded in 1955, in Gehrig's honor. I actually wrote in the edit summary section question why it wasn't included although I forgot the ? mark. Where I question why this particular individual award in MLB wasn't included on List of Major League Baseball awards when the article about the award actually includes link over to the "List of" article. If you know anything about baseball feel free to trim the text on the "list of" article. If not then lets hope someone with bit more baseball knowledge sees the copied text and rewrites copied text to fit the "list of" article better. DoctorHver (talk) 02:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My original message had nothing to do with whether or not the award belongs on the page, and I have no opinion on whether the text needs to be trimmed. I'm just asking that any time you copy text from one article to another, you provide attribution in the edit summary to indicate that the text was copied, for the reasons detailed at WP:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tall Tale (film)

[edit]

Hi, I hope you're okay, I just wanted to tell you to take it off, because I don't think you have any relationship with Disney's remake. 189.220.43.126 (talk) 06:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Screamers

[edit]

Template:Screamers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DoubleCross () 14:04, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American superhero films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Muerto.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films based on English-language comics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Chair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of this account? Is this someone pretending to be you? – PeeJay 22:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea who this is, I guess this someone pretending to be me. DoctorHver (talk) 02:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to report them for impersonation then. – PeeJay 13:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of administrative divisions by country, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of first-level administrative divisions by country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Omer and the Starchild has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to not be notable, as nothing was found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2015

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this article can be improved any further since nothing much has happened since it creation back in 2015. Also worth noting that the France article (in which this TV series originally created) leaves lot to be desired also.). But I suggest this should get proper discussion before any decision is made whether or not to delete the article. Far as the show itself is concerned its actually quite good, its dark themed sci-fi fantasy similar to He-man. But since this show isn't American produced by certain American studios it seems ot mostly have vanished from face of earth DoctorHver (talk) 23:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article The Story of Nick Price Non-Manipulative Selling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2020

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The King and I (1999 film), you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

International editions of Where's Wally?

[edit]

Hi – I was wondering why you deleted the section on international editions of Where's Wally? (in this edit). In the edit summary, you called it a "trivia section", but that doesn't seem to fit how that term is used at MOS:TRIVIA. Also, that guideline says it "does not suggest removing trivia sections". I couldn't find any other guideline or policy that would suggest to remove such a section. In fact, such sections seem to be quite normal, e.g. Three Investigators#International and foreign-language editions, and some series even have an entire article just about their translations, e.g. Translations of The Lord of the Rings and List of Harry Potter translations. I'd restore the section, but I wanted to know your reasons first. Joriki (talk) 16:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Blockade Entertainment. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Mickey Mouse universe media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Reluctant Dragon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Blockade Entertainment

[edit]

Hello, DoctorHver,

Thank you for creating Blockade Entertainment.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is poorly done. Too much content isn't cited. There's not much of a claim of notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chris Troutman (talk) 15:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 115 charges

[edit]

Hello DoctorHver,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 115 charges for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want 115 charges to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bungle (talkcontribs) 18:59, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lists of multimedia franchises
added links pointing to Dennis the Menace, Flipper, Odd Couple, The Naked Brothers Band, Blondie and The Toxic Avenger

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lists of multimedia franchises, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Multimedia franchises

[edit]

The tables in the numerous subpages on multimedia franchises have been formatted as they are for several years, and for good reason. Please obtain a consensus for a change before attempting to split out new columns. BD2412 T 14:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The tables were completely unreadable and usable as they were set up. Creators should be their separate column or not included at all.Im on the option they shouldn't be included at all its unstable to include companies in some cases and then individuals in others. I think users should just find this information by clicking on these articles. DoctorHver (talk) 14:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Absent-Minded Professor

[edit]

Template:The Absent-Minded Professor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 12:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited List of Disney theatrical animated feature films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D23.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Tollens (talk) 11:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blockade Entertainment for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blockade Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockade Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 06:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

[edit]

Hi. this was a terrible move and I reverted it. Please take your idea to the Talk page and gain consensus for the change you would like to make. Thank you DBaK (talk) 16:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cyborg (film series)

[edit]

Template:Cyborg (film series) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 14:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marvel Entertainment. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not revert without providing an explanation, and please adhere to the WP:Bold, revert, discuss policy. You made a WP:BOLD edit, I reverted it, now take it back to the talk page discussion which I have responded to, as to avoid edit warring. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disney table legend

[edit]

Hi,

when you split "[S]" into "[SA]" and "[SL]" at List of Disney theatrical animated feature films, you missed one (still says "[S]") and turned one into "[SD]", which isn't defined in the "Legend" table at the top. Also, is it possible to make the full text appear in the widget that pops up when one hovers over them, like they do for the ones in the "Notes" section at the bottom? Currently, it pointlessly shows "SA" and "SL" again. Cheers!

- 89.183.221.75 (talk) 13:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi DoctorHver. Thank you for your work on DC Super Hero Girls. Another editor, Pygos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

You can further improve the page by adding a short description of the tv series and web series behind the links. See the article on Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pygos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pygos (talk) 05:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walt Disney Animation Studios short films (2000–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eric Goldberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of multimedia franchises originating in games, toys, and merchandise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Stafford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cogs Hollow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cogs Hollow. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 12:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Cogs Hollow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 19:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cogs Hollow for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cogs Hollow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cogs Hollow (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 19:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Hidden

[edit]

Template:The Hidden has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 14:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Arrival 96 series

[edit]

Template:The Arrival 96 series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:29, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cyborg Cop

[edit]

Template:Cyborg Cop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:29, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Terror Within

[edit]

Template:The Terror Within has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mimic

[edit]

Template:Mimic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Monsters (2010)

[edit]

Template:Monsters (2010) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]