Talk:The Last Remnant
The Last Remnant has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
PS3 Release Date
[edit]Nov, 20 2008.
I don't know how to cite sources, but if anyone wants to add, here it is.--68.0.174.28 (talk) 01:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. This one is more complete: http://xbox360.ign.com/objects/904/904861.html Kariteh (talk) 09:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry to burst your bubble. But that is ONLY for the 360 version. The PS3 (or the PC version) is TBA. (talk) 21:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
I saw an ad on TV last night and I'm pretty sure it said "worldwide release." Any one able to confirm this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.161.36 (talk) 13:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Haven't heard about a PS3 release date for this yet. Kenny0709 (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Platforms
[edit]I was just wondering when it was confirmed that the game will be for the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3, I haven't heard anything about it.--67.174.128.249 20:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Square Enix Party 2007. [1] Kariteh 20:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alright thanks, I didn't expect it to be announced this soon since the Square Enix Party 2007 hasn't started yet.--67.174.128.249 20:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- It hasn't? o_O I wonder where this pic come from. It doesn't seem to be a photoshopped pic or anything, but technically we can't put it in the article since it's quite unclear where this comes from. Kariteh 20:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yea the party doesn't start until the 12th, you're probably right that it should stay out of the article until the party has started.--67.174.128.249 20:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- That was a photo from Square Enix press conference, which takes place before the party starts. It's a real photograph that was not photoshopped and here's a bunch of sources who reported on it: [2] [3] [4] [5] SeanMooney 21:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Could you please add one of these refs to the article? Kariteh 21:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- That was a photo from Square Enix press conference, which takes place before the party starts. It's a real photograph that was not photoshopped and here's a bunch of sources who reported on it: [2] [3] [4] [5] SeanMooney 21:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yea the party doesn't start until the 12th, you're probably right that it should stay out of the article until the party has started.--67.174.128.249 20:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- It hasn't? o_O I wonder where this pic come from. It doesn't seem to be a photoshopped pic or anything, but technically we can't put it in the article since it's quite unclear where this comes from. Kariteh 20:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alright thanks, I didn't expect it to be announced this soon since the Square Enix Party 2007 hasn't started yet.--67.174.128.249 20:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Remnant? Maybe related to the Remnants of FFVII? 81.145.241.251 (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Image
[edit]I know wikipedia isn't exacally the place to dicuss this but what is up with Rush's hand in the picture of the combat? It look deformed or something.67.142.161.34 (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
APOSTROPHE!
[edit]Gamespot gave 6.5 citing abysmal frame-rate problems and awful texture pop-in as well as obtuse combat mechanics as the games main failings, they however praised the musical score and visual style.
THIS IS AN ABOMINATION!!! HOW COULD WIKIPEDIA ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN?!? WIKIPEDIA SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED!!! THEY CAN'T EVEN USE APOSTROPHES!!! AND THEY MADE ME LOSE THE GAME TOO!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mao59 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
It would have been easier to just edit in the apostrophe yourself :) 82.39.59.65 (talk) 16:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
But nowhere near as much fun. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mao59 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Characters???
[edit]theres no link here that will send me directly to the list of characters, also i try to look it up myself and i cant find it. Is anyone out there making a seperate article for the characters?Haseo445 (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
PC demo
[edit]PC demo now available JAF1970 (talk) 23:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Hi, could someone write the pc requirements of the game, I really want to buy it but am not shure if my pc and Gpu will work. Rain.El Sardy (talk) 07:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- System Requirements from the official site (Go to PC, scroll down):
- Minimum:
- - 15 GB HDD space
- - XP SP2/Vista SP1
- - Core 2 Duo 2GHz/Athlon X2 2GHz
- - 1.5 GB RAM
- - NVidia GeForce 8600VRAM 256 MB or better
- - 100% DirectSound compatible sound card (DirectX 9.0c or higher)
- - DirectX 9.0c
- - Mouse, Keyboard
- Recommended:
- - 15 GB HDD space
- - Vista SP1
- - Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz/Athlon X2 2.4 GHz
- - 2 GB RAM
- - Nvidia GeForce 8800VRAM 512 MB or better
- - 100% DirectSound compatible sound card (DirectX 9.0c or higher)
- - DirectX 10 (OS Default)
- - Mouse, Keyboard, XBox 360 Controller for Windows--96.18.253.190 (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Plot vs Spoiler
[edit]I was planning on doing some work on the plot section of the article, to make it more detailed, there are many games/movies which have alot more detail in their plots, I would like to add alot more plot detail to the article, however, it may contain spoilers, does anyone object to these?Baaleos (talk) 07:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- I say go for it but put a spoiler disclaimer so that people that actually care to learn the plot on their own don't whine. --72.23.147.74 (talk) 01:30, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
no spoiler disclaimer, just post it. Wikipedia does not put any spoilers disclaimers.Bread Ninja (talk) 18:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Metacritic
[edit]Wikipedia needs to stop being dishonnest about metacritic ratings and at least try to mention when the score was last consulted and posted in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.84.27.186 (talk) 02:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- The rating has been updated. Tavatar (talk) 16:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Last Remnant/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- Well-written: The overall layout is pleasant to view, and the writing style is easy to follow. All important sections appear to be addressed, with style rules being adhered to throughout. Pass
- Factually accurate and verifiable: This article contains a good number of inline sources, including reputable gaming websites: Pass
- Broad in its coverage: Pass
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias. Pass
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Pass
- Illustrated, if possible, by images: Only a few images are included, it might be good to get some more to break up a larger slab of text towards the bottom of the page. The images currently included appear to be tagged correctly with copyright status'. Weak pass
Reviewer: Jwoodger (talk) 07:59, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Not very good at Wikipedia and stuff like that, but the images on the page are horribly outdated, the combat sample looks like an early beta screenshot for instance. I have plenty of screenshots from my own playing I could upload of the game if somebody feels like telling me how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.181.41.218 (talk) 00:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on The Last Remnant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3159373
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005162236/http://www.squareenixmusic.com/composers/sekito/projects.shtml to http://www.squareenixmusic.com/composers/sekito/projects.shtml
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3173423&p=1&sec=REVIEWS
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3171517&p=4&sec=REVIEWS
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/thelastremnant/review.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/lastremnant
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3171265
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)