Talk:The Alchemy

The Alchemy has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 7, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Taylor Swift Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Alchemy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 07:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 18:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can we add other details to the lead? Perhaps the release date, the label, and that she performed it at the Eras Tour
"The Alchemy" is 15th on the track list → I can't really see this in the Music Week source
"On May 12, 2024, Swift performed an acoustic guitar version of "The Alchemy" at the fourth Paris show of her Eras Tour" → I suggest adding another source to support "the acoustic guitar version" claim. It was also performed as a mashup with "Treacherous", if you'd like to add that (this is also not mentioned in the People source, though)
I suggest updating the performances and adding the latest performance which was in London as a mashup with "King of My Heart"
I also suggest adding the release of the limited-time digital version of the mashup with "Treacherous"
"signaled a "good kind" of madness, of falling in love" → I don't really get the "of falling in love" thing? Any way to paraphrase this part?
"Hodgkinson gave the song a five-star rating: "It's excellent—epic but intimate, like the final scene in a blockbuster" → Can we also paraphrase this to avoid the direct quoting? Hodgkinson also dubbed it a "happy ending" and compared it to works by Stevie Nicks, maybe you'd like to add this?
Any source for the personnel section?
Ref 5; missing the authors
Ref 19; subscription access
Ref 20; linking the publication
Ref 27; I recommend directly using this source instead, since WP:RSPSS suggests not confusing the US ABC News with other publications

Everything else looks good! Sorry for suggesting adding several things, but it seems that the article hasn't been updated for a while and missing a couple of things. @Ippantekina: I will put this On hold for now, glad to pass once everything is addressed. Medxvo (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Medxvo all done! Thanks for the review :) Ippantekina (talk) 14:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Ippantekina: I think you forgot to add an additional source to the Paris performance (which was my third point), but never mind, I just added it myself because it's not a big deal. Thanks for your work and for expanding the article! It definitely looks much better now and I'm happy to say that I'll will ✓ Pass the article now. Congratulations! Medxvo (talk) 15:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]