Talk:The 500 Most Influential Muslims

This article was nominated for deletion on November 22, 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was delete.

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jordan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks YOU can help with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

No importance to Muslims engaged in the modern era for advancement of Physics, Chemistry, socio-politics etc. is beyond the demand of present age. The compiler & publisher ofThe 500 Most Influential Muslims must include entries in proportionate to specific branches. Regional and linguistic disparity can best be overcome by equitable distribution of religion-cum-science based influence. Nannadeem (talk) 08:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a discussion of the publication "The 500 Most Influential Muslims" and not a comment on the Wikipedia article itself.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This list is a typical propoganda joke written by the errand boy of of the arab monarchs (ghazi bin muhammad) who every few years throws darts at a board of the people who he needs to ingratiate himself to. then he thinks things like: but we should include some token women!!! and then googles "islam and women" to find someone who he can put at the bottom of the list.

The funniest thing is they have to treat these arab psychopaths like MBS with respect and talk about their charity organizations when they go around chopping peoples heads off and dismembering them for their personal advancement. its a bullshit list written by a bullshit organization attempting to prop up a bygone bullshit royal kingdom establishment that will be blown away in a matter of time.

I cant think of a more powerless individual than King Abdallah of jordan who probably gets written permission from the US embassy every time he wipes his ass on the toilet.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Mufti-taqi.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Qardawi.JPG

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Current top ten

I reverted the 1st place back to President Erdogan, as that was most likely a vandalism edit. However, I'm not sure if this ranking for Erdogan is correct either. I reverted it back simply based on the edit prior to this. https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=The_500_Most_Influential_Muslims&diff=next&oldid=970479286 Muffizainu (talk) 14:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

user:IAmAtHome and user:Materialscientist - There's a lot of vandalism going on. If you can look into this.

Erdogan need not be No.1, however, the edits after July 31 2020 have all been incorrect. Muffizainu (talk) 14:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both the contents (Current top ten and Previous top ten entrants) need an update yearly but these are not being updated. I think removing the both contents is a good option. The reason is that the contents have no update (since 2016) and here is 2020 Edition file available. @Materialscientist: Do you have any opinion about this?

IAmAtHome (talk) 15:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hope a response from @Gråbergs Gråa Sång: (Read previous reply) Do you have any opinion about this?

IAmAtHome (talk) 05:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no current opinion, except that "Current top ten" is not good per MOS:DATED. If 2020 is "settled" the section can be named "2020 top ten". If not, we should stick to 2019 until it is. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Mufti Taqi Usmani.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

The article has been vandalized multiple times by IPs since January which I corrected. Casatamca (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]