Talk:Tasmanian Government Railways

Trains Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	October 29, 2019

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Tasmania / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Tasmanian Government Railways is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Incorrectly titled

This is about the locomotives/rolling stock - virtually nothing about the actual railway system or organisation at all - possibly a name change? Satu Suro 05:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The current title should be for the railway organisation. NSW has Rail rollingstock in New South Wales - possibly split the content from this page to Tasmanian Government Railways rollingstock, as it is all TGR stuff. Once the locos and such all get their own pages then make a navbox and redirect the title back here. Long time until that happens though.

Or we could leave it there, and just expand the rest so it doesn't dominate. Wongm (talk) 05:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Locos

The details are undue - either all the makers/loco types - but a stand alone sub section without mention of an others is somewhat odd and not a balanced approach Satu Suro 13:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Content

This subject has been commenced in fine fashion but now lacks some historic detail. SatuSuro above has a point. How about some archive images and map-overlay positional detail of the two Hobart railway stations? And what about some detail of where the locomotive depot(s) and freight infrastructure was located? Tassie rail history afficianado's??... anyone?? Throttleer (talk) 02:28, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

T'Rails listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T'Rails. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

'initially constructed'?

'initially constructed' is a tautology. You don't need 'early' and 'initially' Just 'constructed' will do. 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:4499:6CC2:41ED:CD66 (talk) 21:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]