User talk:Wongm

Archives

Archive 1. Archive 2 Archive 3.

Orphaned non-free image (File:MURLA-logo.gif)

You've uploaded File:MURLA-logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello?

Hey Wongm, you haven't been replying to some past messages. I guess your busy with other things.

I recently created a Forums account on Vicsig site. It's really good because you can shar information with other people and vice versa and by that you things that you didn't know. I've made posts already.

My Vicsig Forum Username is Mr. V/Line. Try sending me a private message.

It would be good to get back in touch with you.

WikiSandbox1 (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I might see you around the forums a bit more, I haven't had that much time for Wikipedia over the past few months. Wongm (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

file:Vicrailmap-albury.png

Hello! There is a question at German map lab if it wouldn't be better to change the colour of New South Wales in this map. Some might think Albury is a coast town cos NSW has got the same colour as the ocean. Would you like to change it? I don't want to do it myself as long as the creator of a map is still active at WP. If you don't want to do it I will upload a changed file with a different name so your version remains untouched. Thanks. --NNW (talk) 14:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you mention it, it makes sense. I will change it to a generic grey instead I think, I have a whole series of maps, this one is just a small crop of the bigger one. Wongm (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed it up and reuploaded under the same name. Wongm (talk)

Speedy deletion of Sunshine Biscuits (Australia)

A tag has been placed on Sunshine Biscuits (Australia) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cerejota (talk) 10:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article RE bus route upgrades

"State fails call to upgrade transport", REID SEXTON, 22 Feb 09, Sunday Age, p. 12

Ottre 08:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Vlocity Article

The change I made was correct on the article. Go to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/VLocity and go down to passenger experience. The photograph clearly shows 3 two-car sets, but the caption is wrong. All I did was to change that. Please look at the changes made before judging.

Regarding Vlocity Article

The change I made was correct on the article. Go to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/VLocity and go down to passenger experience. The photograph clearly shows 3 two-car sets, but the caption is wrong. All I did was to change that. Please look at the changes made before judging. 210.49.64.149 (talk) 12:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wall ball

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wall ball. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wall ball. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image on Bendigo line

Mate, you've got two errors on the map of the Bendigo line.

You've spelt Riddell's Creek incorrectly (note the correct spelling)
You've got Riddell's Creek and Clarkefield the wrong way around.

Thanks. RICK ME DOODLE YOU DOODLE 07:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed it up and reuploaded under the same name. Wongm (talk) 11:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Geelong-a-power-station-1948.jpg

File:Geelong-a-power-station-1948.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Geelong A Power Station, 1948.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Geelong A Power Station, 1948.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain...

Could you please explain why you redirected Ship_lifts_in_China?

Could you please direct me to where you raised this redirection for discussion?

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 01:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't being it up, as I didn't see it as controversial, I was just Wikipedia:Be bold and did it. List of boat lifts already existed, there isn't many "Thing X in country Y" type lists in existance, and the page in question was very short and will always be (unlike say "Cities in country Z"). Wongm (talk) 11:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was a mistake. It is long past the time when there should be a standalone article on the three gorges ship lift, and there should be a separate article on the lesser ship lifts. In my opinion Be Bold contains bad advice.

A short length is not a reason to merge articles. What is important about how we cover topics, and subtopics, is how they are interconnected. When a topic has multiple topics it is closely related to, which are not closely related to one another, it definitely should be a stand-alone article. Why? Because there are multiple paths through which an interested reader might reach it. The three gorges ship lift is the largest ship lift in the world. So it is strongly and closely linked to other shiplifts. It is also strongly and closely linked to the Three Gorges Dam. Shoehorning (some) of the details into a related article was a very grave disservice to readers who are interested in the ship lift relationship with the OTHER topic. The ONLY way to be fair is to have it be a standalone article, that can be equally easily reached with a wikilink from either topic.

If we let you, or some other mergist, unwisely merge topics related to multiple other topics, into one of the related articles, we guarantee some of the information we could cover will be off topic. If it is merged into 3 gorges dam, some information about the ship lift will be off-topic. If we merge it into the general article on shiplifts, some information on the 3 gorges dam will be off-topic. This general problem with merging is completely unavoidable, no matter where the article is merged.

So don't do it. Geo Swan (talk) 21:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yarra Trams & KDR Melbourne Articles

Hi Wongm,

I have noticed that you have previously made quite a lot of edits on the Yarra Trams article, as a gunzel myself I have also noticed that you are on a couple of the railway forums such as Railpage Australia^TM and that your opinion and knowledge on Public Transport issues are highly respected. I just wanted to bring to your attention that it has been suggested that the KDR Melbourne article and Yarra Trams article should be merged, it will appreciated if you express your opinion/suggestions on the matter here.

Thanks, Sheepunderscore (talk) 08:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will post a comment over at the talk page for the article. Wongm (talk) 08:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bairnsdale Line

Template:Bairnsdale Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Light Timber Construction (Schools)

Thanks for the substantial references and additions you've added to Light Timber Construction (Schools). There seemed to be a complete lack of info on LTC architecture, so I felt it was time to draft an article. I intend accessing more material from the Public Records Office in coming weeks, to enrich the article further.

Thanks for your support!

Adonline (talk) 12:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Adonline[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Astor Theatre

Hi, a couple of things about Astor Theatre. First, if there is no primary topic, the disambig should be at Astor Theatre instead of Astor Theatre (disambiguation). But that's not a big deal. The second is, per WP:FIXDABLINKS, we could use your help to point the links going to Astor Theatre to the correct article. Navigation popups with the popupFixDabs flag set to true is very helpful. --JaGa^talk 16:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VR box & louvre vans article

Hi Wongm,

any chance you could look over the chapters of the Victorian Railways Box and Louvre Vans article I'm working on, and 'de-gunzel' it as well as fix referencing and add infoboxes and photos?

So far, done the refrigeration, hearse, explosive and narrow gauge chapters. Will probably work on the baggage/mail vans next, then attack the

Thanks, Steamtostay (talk) 17:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Murray-2 Hydroelectric Power Station

An article that you have been involved in editing, Murray-2 Hydroelectric Power Station , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rangasyd (talk) 12:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 05:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Heidelberg-duplication.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Heidelberg-duplication.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Montague packing shed exterior.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Montague packing shed exterior.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Port-Dock-station-1952.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Port-Dock-station-1952.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup

Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 05:15, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ViclinkAndClosedStations

Template:ViclinkAndClosedStations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sw2nd (talk) 04:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MetlinkAndClosedStations

Template:MetlinkAndClosedStations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sw2nd (talk) 04:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MelbourneRailwayStation-Mini

Template:MelbourneRailwayStation-Mini has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sw2nd (talk) 04:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bendigo bank.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bendigo bank.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Themeparkgc Talk 02:02, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26

Melbourne Meetup

Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus
Previous: 25 November 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 07:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

Various VR articles

G'day,

Have reorganised the VR template and added a traffic section, need help with the coding as noted in the Talk page.

Also most of the way through the Hopper article, can you have a look over it?

Cheers, Dave Anothersignalman (talk) 12:35, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Main Southern railway line, New South Wales

I would welcome your input on Proposed changes to Main Southern railway line, New South Wales and its associated route diagram template which you created or substantially expanded. Dbromage [Talk] 08:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:280hp-walker-railcar.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:280hp-walker-railcar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Alamein-line-duplication-works.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alamein-line-duplication-works.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Artists-impression-yallourn-victoria.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Artists-impression-yallourn-victoria.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yallourn-technical-school.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yallourn-technical-school.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 11 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Wodonga Rail Bypass page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chicago Freight Car Leasing Australia logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Freight Car Leasing Australia logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rosstown map

Hi. I've just realised that there a few spelling mistakes in your diagram of the Rosstown Railway line (such as "Elsternwick", "Caulfield" and "Glenhuntly Rd" labels missing various letters). Do you have the original image and can you correct and update in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizen D (talk • contribs) 06:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Victorian rail line

Template:Infobox Victorian rail line has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox rail line. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Alakzi (talk) 12:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yallourn-houses.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yallourn-houses.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yallourn-power-station-1948.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yallourn-power-station-1948.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yallourn-power-station-workers.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yallourn-power-station-workers.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:24, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geelong Library and Heritage Centre

Dear Wongm

I have followed your rail and Geelong photos, and congratulate you on the excellent work.

I was wondering if might have a photo of the new Geelong Library and Heritage Centre, you could upload, so I can include it in this article.

best wishes

Garyvines (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Crowes railway line

An article that you have been involved in editing—Crowes railway line—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Novarupta (talk) 14:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wongm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wongm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Nla-pic-an24056977-v.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nla-pic-an24056977-v.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Town-square-yallourn.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Town-square-yallourn.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Victorian-Railways-precut-house.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Victorian-Railways-precut-house.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yallourn-shopping-centre.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yallourn-shopping-centre.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:25, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yallourn-theatre.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yallourn-theatre.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:25, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wongm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Geelong former LGAs

A tag has been placed on Template:Geelong former LGAs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dysonlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dysonlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album c is for cookie cookies favourite songs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Album c is for cookie cookies favourite songs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 422 class

Hello, Wongm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Goldsztajn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've proposed an article that you started, 422 class, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criteria and I believe that the article obviously and uncontroversially does not belong in an encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Goldsztajn (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Just to clarify this message, I've added WP:hatnotes to the two articles this disambiguation page covers, nothing directs to the Class 422 page.--Goldsztajn (talk) 18:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 48 class

Hello, Wongm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Goldsztajn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've proposed an article that you started, 48 class, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criteria and I believe that the article obviously and uncontroversially does not belong in an encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Goldsztajn (talk) 18:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As above, I've added hatnotes to the relevant articles.--Goldsztajn (talk) 18:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 90 class

Hello, Wongm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Goldsztajn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've proposed an article that you started, 90 class, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criteria and I believe that the article obviously and uncontroversially does not belong in an encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Goldsztajn (talk) 18:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Locostyles

Template:Locostyles has been nominated for merging with Template:Steam locomotive exhaust systems. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 10:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Locomotive styles

Template:Locomotive styles has been nominated for merging with Template:Locomotive running gear. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 11:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Swan Hill

An article that you have been involved in editing—Swan Hill—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jonathan O'Donnell (talk) 00:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saint Ignatius College Geelong Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saint Ignatius College Geelong Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1969 Melbourne Transportation Plan Map

Just wanted to know if you have an image that you can upload, or an image you can give permission to be uploaded, that is a map of the freeways in the 1969 Melbourne Transportation Plan?

--iamthinking2202 (please ping on reply if you would be so kind) 07:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:M-Tram-brand.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:M-Tram-brand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject you may be interested in

Hi, there is currently a proposal for an Australian Transport Wikiproject. I thought you may be interested due to your edits and interests in transport in Australia. The proposal can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Australian Transport. If you are interested, add yourself to the Support section of the page. Thank you! (unsigned/undated)

It is up and running - you asked me all those years ago if it was a possibility - and it has happened after all the time passed. The critical mass has arrived, thanks for your interest then, its a few weeks since we discussed it, sorry about that. JarrahTree 07:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]