Jump to content

Talk:Swahili language/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Semantics for noun classes

The article has a large section about how in Swahili the noun classes are more semantically motivated than in Indo-european languages. I don't think that this is the concensus amongst Bantuists. For other Bantu languages Demuth has argued IIRC that children pay only a limited amount of attention to semantics when they are learning the noun class system, and in most Bantu languages (including Swahili) semantics plays a very limited role in determining what noun class a noun should be in.In my opinion the semantic motivation outlined in the article is not in heads of native speakers of Swahili. Also, I doubt some of the extensions mentioned (such as frog being a not fully a land animal and thererore being only marginal an animal.

There are a few cases where there is a clear semantic component in determining what noun class a word is. For instance, languages all belong to noun class 7. But the same is true for Indo-European languages. In my native language Dutch all languages are Neuter. And if we would use these extentions we might find that the genders in Indo-European languages are equally semantically driven. --Merijn2 (talk) 13:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Even the source given in the article[1] states the opposite: That there is no consensus, that there is the opinion that there has not been any semantic motivation in Proto-bantu. And seriously: What are “European languages”—that is linguistically quite meaningless. The source also claims that there have been as well theories of perfect semantic motivation of genera in Proto-indo-european, but the source calls these theories (for Indo-european and Bantu) a “myth”. Genders have been merged in Indo-european languages as well, and there are many motivations, motivation by social gender, motivation by nymphs inhabiting things. I have deleted the introduction of the section. I hesitate to delete the rest. There is certainly some truth in it backed by the source. But it is only based on one source and I have not checked whether it is correctly paraphrased (the introduction was quite the opposite of the content of the source!). Maybe it is safer to delete all the stuff. It is also to detailed taking into account that there is currently no general discussion of the question of/dispute about semantic motivation. Opinions? @Merijn2: --Chricho ∀ (talk) 12:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Number of speakers?

"It is spoken by over 50 million people[1], of whom there are approximately five million first-language speakers and thirty to fifty million second-language speakers[citation needed]" Huh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.189.78.67 (talk) 20:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Native speakers: 800,000, not five million. Since 1960, a mystique has grown up around this one language. Hurmata 07:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
The statistics from Tanzania quoted by SIL which I think is what Lutz is quoting are based on census data. These data assume that a person's stated ethnic origin is synonomous with the related language being the person's first language. The Tanzanian census data do not capture "first language". My own experience in Tanzania is that increasing numbers of children have Swahili as their first language even if this is not their "Mother" tongue as such. Therefore Lutz's estimate of the number of first language Swahili speakers is probably an underestimate rather than an overestimate. Peter.edelsten 17:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
In Kenya too maybe three-quarters of the population speak some form of Swahili as their first and often only language. Really all public life that isn't middle-class is conducted in Swahili, including most public media, almost all state communication and all religious instruction in urban centres where close to 50% of the population live. Add in another 30% who live in ethnically cosmopolitan areas and upto 80% of Kenyans speak Swahili as a first language.Galana (talk) 11:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
What sort of mystique? Why? —Wiki Wikardo 05:44, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
In any event, the estimates in the article's first paragraph differ from the estimates in the language box. These should be harmonized, and the article should explain how these numbers were arrived at. AxelBoldt (talk) 00:37, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Agreed, The numbers of speakers in the article ranges from 60 to 150 million. If that is the margin of error in the estimate, so be it, but keep it consistent. Tim (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 15 July 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 17:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

– WP:COMMONNAME and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Native name. Similar to Kirundi and Kinyarwanda. As the official language of both Tanzania and Kenya it supercedes the "people" and "culture" articles. Swahili should redirect to the language article. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 05:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 02:15, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Strong Support the first requested move (Swahili language → Kiswahili) per WP:NCLANG: there is no need to suffix the title with "language" when the proposed title "Kiswahili" does not share its name with any other thing. "Kiswahili" is a WP:CONCISE (yet totally unambiguous) title. Evidence from Goolge Ngram shows "Kiswahili" is also by far more common than the phrase "Swahili language" in books. There is absolutely no ambiguity in the proposed title. Kiswahili always refers to the language, and never to Swahili people, because of the Kiswahili prefix ki- in it which is used to indicate that it is a title about the language. However, oppose the second requested move (Swahili → Swahili (disambiguation)), because "Swahili" is an ambiguous name and can also refer to Swahili people. Khestwol (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
You apparently did not read NCLANG. This is exactly what it opposes. — kwami (talk) 05:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose the first move. "Swahili" still is the most common way to refer to the language in English, and despite the Google Ngram given above, appending "language" is the natural form of disambiguation. "Swahili+language" returns five times as many English Google Books results as "Kiswahili". "Swahili" is also used by the most books with the name of the language in their title, all of the external links currently given in the article, the Encyclopædia Britannica, Kenya's tourism website, etc. Moving this page to "Swahili" might make sense though. —innotata 20:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose per WPLANG. When possible, we use the name common to a people and their language for both, disambiguating the latter with "language". In fact, WPLANG arose over consensus over whether this article should be at "Swahili" or "Kiswahili", with "Swahili" winning out. — kwami (talk) 05:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Wording

"After Germany attacked the region known as Tanganyika (present-day mainland,Tanzania) for a colony in 1886,..." There are several mistakes in that sentence. You can't attack a region, you could occupy or invade it. But that's not exactly true. 1886 is the year, when the area was declared sphere of interest. Later it became a protectorate (and not a colony). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.145.153.219 (talk) 00:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Native to Somalia?

What does this mean? Literally nobody speaks it there except for small number of people in Barawa and Bajuni islands. It would be like saying Somali is native to Yemen because there are some people who speak it there. I'm suggesting to edit it out. Knfr44 (talk) 17:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Infobox

First the documentation for the name field is meant to be the same as the name for the article. Next the alternate name field already has kiswhaili in it. Thus the IPs edits ar, in effect putting one name twice in the infobox which, to be generous, just looks silly. To say nothing of the WP:POINTiness of the edit. MarnetteD|Talk 14:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2017

Please delete the unsourced material that has been added to this article during the last few days. The editors in question appear to believe that adding material with a "citation needed" tag satisfies the Wikipedia requirement that material be sourced. This longstandingly unsourced material was deleted, followed promptly by restoration several times with "citation needed" tags. Thanks. (1) "Today's standard Swahili, the version taught as a second language, is for practical purposes Zanzibar Swahili even though there are minor discrepancies between the written standard and the Zanzibar vernacular.[citation needed]" (2) diff ==Name==

Kiswahili is the Swahili word for the language and is also sometimes used in English. The name Swahili comes from the plural sawāḥil (سواحل) of the Arabic word sāḥil (ساحل), meaning "boundary" or "coast", used as an adjective meaning "coastal dwellers". (The same word is the origin of the term Sahel.) With the prefix ki-, it means "coastal language", ki- being a prefix attached to nouns of the noun class such as languages.

2605:6000:EF43:8500:8D1D:42A:EA65:9EF5 (talk) 09:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

 Not done This material has been the subject of dispute and edit warring. The matter needs to be worked out by discussion on this page. --MelanieN (talk) 14:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Please note no unsourced info has been added in the last few days. The sections being removed have CN tags added last month. Normally these are left for several months to give other editors a chance to respond to them. The current removal is WP:POINTy. A request for input in this situation has been placed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages though I do not know how many responses this may bring. MarnetteD|Talk 16:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
The removal of unsourced material is not "pointy" as removal is specifically authorized by Wikipedia policy. From WP:V: "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." From WP:Burden: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, [bolding in the original] and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." 2605:6000:EF43:8500:8D1D:42A:EA65:9EF5 (talk) 11:49, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Name of the article

There are plenty of sources in the article to justify its name of "Swahili language". While Kishwahili may be a slightly more accurate term for the language it is not the only one. Common usage comes into play in a situation like this. For example there is the article Irish language even though the more accurate term is Gaelic. If the person using the rotating IPs wants to rename the article they will need to file a formal request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Until an approved move occurs the "Name field" in the infobox needs to remain Swahili per current policy an guidelines. MarnetteD|Talk 16:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Which "policies" and "guidelines" are you referring to? 2605:6000:EF43:8500:8D1D:42A:EA65:9EF5 (talk) 11:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Comorian or Shikomor?

The language spoken in the Comoros is inconsistently described as "Comorian" and "Shikomor", which are both linked to the same article, entitled "Comorian". I don't which is right, but the same term should surely be used throughout.89.212.50.177 (talk) 11:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Diphtongs

I'll remove the sentence:

Swahili has no diphthongs; in vowel combinations, each vowel is pronounced separately so the Swahili word for "leopard", chui, is pronounced /tʃu.i/, as two syllables.

Yeah, chui is bisyllabic, but the very same name of the language includes a diftong, -wa-. Also in other examples in the very same article we have dog, mbwa, with another diphtong. --46.25.48.186 (talk) 06:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't necessarily have to be analyzed as a diphthong. According to our consonant table, /w/ is a consonantal phoneme in Swahili, so /wa/ is probably just a sequence of a consonant followed by a vowel. Mr KEBAB (talk) 05:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Saa moja mchana

What does "saa moja mchana" actually mean. 7 AM or 7 PM? Personally, I think it's 7 PM. 112.215.64.134 (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

I don't think "saa moja mchana" is correct. Mchana is the first half of the afternoon (i.e. noon to 3PM). The second half of the afternoon (3PM to 6PM) is jioni. 6PM to 6AM is usiku (night time), and 6AM to noon is asubuhi (morning). The numbers are offset by six, so you have saa 1-6 asubuhi, saa 7-9 mchana, saa 10-12 jioni, and saa 1-12 usiku. If I were to hear saa moja mchana, I would guess that the person was either using Western time (in which case it would be 1PM) or that they were generalizing mchana to mean "not asubuhi" (in which case it would mean 7PM). That last one might make sense if the person were in the northern latitudes during the summer, since 7PM in America feels like mchana or jioni even though it's usiku. 96.74.73.174 (talk) 18:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Phonology

What ever's happened to that section? It used to be fairly comprehensive, if still poor in references; now, after some deletionists gutted it, it's just a flashy-dashy table, with little to no elaboration.

Notably, implosives were renamed to voiced consonants, in spite of being mentioned in one of the sources. 37.190.146.24 (talk) 13:31, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Glottal stop

I'm wondering about the sequences of identical vowels, which occur even in Bantu words sometimes, but especially in Arabic loans, like jamaa. Is a glottal stop ever heard in these, like [ɟa.ma.ʔa]? Or do they become lengthened monophthongs, like [ɟa.maː]? — I mean, [ɟa.ma.a] is not impossible to be realised, but unless a glottal stop were inserted, this would be very likely to be contracted in some way. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.77.144.252 (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

There is no sole or correct way of mixing up two different languages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.195.129 (talk) 08:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

kiSwahili language day?

Does this language have a day that celebrates it, either by national law or via the East African Community/African Union community engagement? -- sion8 talk page 00:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Probably not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.195.129 (talk) 08:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Master servant language

The writer Roald Dahl reports that when he was working in Tanganyika in 1939, Swahili was the language for the white people to talk to the Africans, and that they were discouraged from using English, so as to maintain a master servant relationship. Noel Ellis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noel Ellis (talk • contribs) 09:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

The noun classes section needs an introduction

The noun classes section needs an introduction. It delves right into specifics of the ki-/vi- class and the m-/mi- class without first having laid the foundation that Swahili nouns are divided into classes! And that these largely, at least historically, are based on semantic categories; that they are characterized by their prefixes; that other parts of the sentence show accord with the class of the nouns it contains; etc. The agreement section is rather opaque as well. I know the main article is Swahili grammar, but what we present here should be internally comprehensible and useful. Largoplazo (talk) 10:57, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Hooray, one's been added! Largoplazo (talk) 22:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

"Multiple studies favor classifying prenasalization as consonant clusters, not as separate phonemes."

The source for this statement does not explicitly make such a claim, and it was published in 1967, so it may not be accurate information. User:MToumbola (talk) 17:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

"The Swahili language is a daughter language of the Pokomo language which is also known as Kingozi."

There seem to be no sources for this, on either this page or Pokomo language, and these claims do not seem to be made on many of the other language versions of these pages. My understanding is that Swahili is a relative, but not a descendant of, Pokomo, as is claimed on these two pages. For now, I have added a [Citation needed] tag to the article so someone with more knowledge can determine if that should be kept or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.67.70.35 (talk) 21:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Zones

Note that Guthrie put languages in his zones for non-linguistic reasons. The zones are thus idiotic and should be ignored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.195.129 (talk) 08:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

I disagree about the Bantu language zones being idiotic - they're geographic units set up because the genetic classification of Bantu languages hasn't been figured out. Neighboring languages are not necessarily closely related but they do influence each other. Having some sub-grouping is easier than having hundreds of Bantu languages in a gigantic alphabetical list. The non-genetic nature of the groups should be noted. 2601:441:4400:1740:9C4F:33F1:73E7:3ED9 (talk) 05:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Map change proposed

The article mentions dialects spoken in Somalia. Shouldn't the map be revised to make Somalia pale blue then? 2601:441:4400:1740:9C4F:33F1:73E7:3ED9 (talk) 05:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Number of native speakers

The higher figure in the infobox is sourced to Ethnologue. That source has 16 million native speakers of (Coastal) Swahili, 2 million speakers of Congo Swahili, and about 100 thousand each for Makwe and Mwani. The number of L2 users is of course much larger. Kanguole 09:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2019 and 1 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KrystleW.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

200 million speakers?

The cited source for 200 million has been the first I've seen to claim such high numbers, is it reliable enough a source? I thought it was more towards 100–150 million Jiaminglimjm (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Botswana and South Sudan

We should also add Botswana and South Sudan have introduced Swahili language in their school curriculum Nlivataye (talk) 15:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

That doesn't really mean the language is spoken there. Languages are taught in schools in a number of locations, but that doesn't mean they're widely spoken or a part of the public or private lives of the inhabitants. 197.232.101.191 (talk) 07:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Map - official status in Rwanda

The map used to illustrate the article appears to be incorrect. It indicates that Kiswahili does not have official status in Rwanda, but (as the infobox correctly states) it is an official language in Rwanda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.140.249 (talk) 11:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Swahili as a Bantu Language?

The Waswahili of the east coast of Africa (and littoral islands) do not consider themselves Bantu and frequently make pains to stress this. The Swahili is a Bantu Language 'thing' comes from a single controversial source (Spear. T.) which has been coopted as a frequently repeated 'truth' in recent times by African Studies groups more for 'political/ideological' reasons (in much the same vein as the reasons why Nyerere elected to make it the national language of Tanzania while conveniently forgetting the Zanzibar origin story). The genetic makeup of the Waswahili is complex with Afro(prim.Bantu)-arab, South Asian and Oceanic sources in the mix. The main religious, cultural and architectural influences in the region are clearly Asiatic/Arabian in origin (there is absolutely no demonstrable lineage to any equivalent Bantu culture from the regions the Bantu migrated from). The broad sweeping historical claims within this article are using Wikipedia as an agent of insidious cultural appropriation. It is an insult to contemporary Waswahili and does a gross disservice to their History as a distinct emergent people and culture on the east coast of Africa.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:70F5:2400:4414:DE34:6670:DD93 (talk) 07:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

I would just add to my original statement that it is not clear to me that you couldn't do what T.Spear has done to any creole language and claim the same. For example: If you were to take grammatical nuances and certain word subsets from any West Indian creole you could claim that they were not English in origin. Which is fine! But, if you were to remove the English words from the language what do you have? Kiswahili owed a huge amount of words to Omani Arabic (around 50% in the 1800s). The farther back you go in history that word percentage would increase. Modern Swahili owes less and less as other languages have contributed to its growth. I would posit that this is 'normal' for any creole language! The reduction in Arabic does not deflect from its original contribution (nor deflect from its source) which goes back by some estimates for 1,000 years or more. 2001:8003:70F5:2400:A967:6573:3C00:643D (talk) 02:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC) ... and would further add (as per the re-writing of History is concerned in this article) the Arabs(and others) didn't just trade ... they settled and were the epicentres of Trade in the region. If anybody is going to listen to the Waswahili themselves (which apparently they don't) those early settlers included Persians (Ismailis). 2001:8003:70F5:2400:A967:6573:3C00:643D (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Non-linguistic arguments have no place in linguistic classification. Bantu is a linguistic concept which has been extended into the discourse of other disciplines. The classification of Kiswahili as a Bantu language is not just based on Spear, but can be also found in hundreds of other sources. It rests on strictly linguistic evidence and the fact that the grammatical core of Kiswahili is Bantu, with a large Arabic lexical overlay.
This talk page is not a forum to present novel ideas, but a place to discuss how to improve the article based on WP:reliable sources. If have you reliable sources that challenge the classification of Kiswahili as a Bantu language, please present them here and we can discuss if they can be included in the article. –Austronesier (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Bantu is a conglomerate genetic marker that is used to model the expansion of the 'Bantu' people into Eastern and Southern Africa (the linguistic concept follows the same pattern). The focal point of academic thought is therefore west-to-east/south. This naturally negates a westward-thinking influence which gets lost in this analysis. Historically, language follows power dynamics ... Kiswahili exists for example in the Congo because Tippu Tip and others would drive 10,000 man armies into the region along well established Trading Towns (which is one example of an east-to-west dynamic that is in conflict with the broad-sweep thought of Bantu Language evolution and one that I would argue is synchronous with the power-dynamic on the East African coast that contradicts this general thinking). But, I'll throw it back to back to the linguistics: Would you consider West Indian creole to be a derivative of English (or French depending on the island) or sourced from a language native to any of the majority Niger-Congo peoples that inhabit those islands today? It could be asserted that the grammatical core of many West Indian creoles (or even some London slangs) is not English and yet I don't think anybody would assert they are not English Languages in origin. Creole languages dump grammar first because it's not familiar. Many people learning to speak English learn keywords first and grammar last (look at stereotypical Chinese/Indian english-speak for example). As for sources the T.Spear paper is a focal point for change in perspectives from everything that came before (there are plenty of sources before him ... any discourse on Kiswahili/East African History prior to 1980). It assuredly presents a lot of funding opportunities for academics working on the subject today but does not negate the scholarship that came before. Nor, was the evolution of Kiswahili in a vacuum. It came with Islam which is ubiquitous with the Waswahili ... is anybody, in the same vein going to assert that Islam is African in origin on the basis that it was historically practised with localised variation on the east coast of Africa? 2001:8003:70F5:2400:AC0C:BB99:B7E5:F1A6 (talk) 00:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
... also, if this article is linguistic in basis then the historical inferences that are counter-factual should be removed! 144.134.99.146 (talk) 01:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
If I might be so presumptuous to provide an answer to my own question:
Kiswahili (most definitely Kiunguja) would have been considered for most of its History as an Arabic Creole (if a summation of the lexicon of the language is the measure of such a definition (which I would argue is appropriate for a creole language, otherwise you are going to have to redefine the linguistic origins of for example; Jamaican Patois (there you go ... 100 years worth of academic papers in that))). This characterisation is not what Spear did and if you want to take Spear's method and apply it to any number of modern creole languages ... I think you are then going to be raising a few eyebrows as to what constitutes a language). I am not sure the grammatical argument holds if you look at 'formal' Kiswahili written in Arabic script (and I don't think Spear did that). The lingual lineage between Swahili tribes on the coast just shows lineage amongst Tribes along the coast ... it makes no distinction as to the nature of influence the language had going east-to-west or vice-versa. As has been noted before Kiswahili is non-tonal (most Bantu languages are tonal). There is a distinct difference in 'flow' of the language when spoken by Waswahili and non-Waswahili speakers that Spear does not account for and which would be interesting to compare to Arabic. I think if you characterise a language using a very specific sub-set of that language your conclusions are by no means generic (and as I have mentioned before, the grammatical (and keyword) argument is weak in a language that has its origins in a creole language). 2001:8003:70F5:2400:AC0C:BB99:B7E5:F1A6 (talk) 04:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
So while acknowledging that modern Swahili would, by the classification laid out (the bulk of its lexicon) be a Bantu Language, I would throw this out to the Linguists out there:
Why isn't Kiswahili regarded as an Arabic creole (or is it)? 2001:8003:70F5:2400:897A:E657:5680:268F (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Sabaki isn't a language?

From the text: "In fact, while taking account of daily vocabulary, using lists of one hundred words, 72–91% were inherited from the Sabaki language (which is reported as a parent language)". This is problematic as Sabaki isn't a language. If the text means Sabaki Languages then it will have to specify 1) the parent within those and 2) the set of languages and 3) the direction of transfer between those languages as this is kind of important in determining the claim of derivation. 2001:8003:70F5:2400:9805:FA9A:9380:88BD (talk) 22:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Usability

Wikipedia is advertised as an encyclopedia. I submit this means articles should also include clear details for non-professionals e.g. "Swahili is/is not a tonal language." — Preceding unsigned comment added by AHintOfChamomile (talk • contribs) 13:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Well, the lede already says so. 2A02:AB04:2AB:700:1040:D901:5C6D:FE57 (talk) 15:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I meant it says is not tonal. It has a stress accent on the penultimate syllable. --2A02:AB04:2AB:700:1040:D901:5C6D:FE57 (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

The statement that Swahili is not tonal was introduced in March 2022 and removed in September 2022, possibly as part of Wikipedia's institutional encouragement of vandalism masked as WP:V.--2A00:23C6:148A:9B01:E852:FE1D:9805:B03 (talk) 14:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Numbers of speakers

I just wish non African or non East Africans should just stop editing and insisting on their bullshit numbers that don't exist and keep reverting actual edits on people on the ground but they still insist on their stupid numbers. Imagine if a Tanzanian insisted only 2 million Americans spoke English and around 20 million in total Nlivataye (talk) 09:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

40% Arabic loanwords or 15%?

Classification section says it's 40%, supported by sources, and then in the next section the table under History -> Origin says 15%. Mmiklas (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Would like to point the same inconsistency out. BasilLeaf (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Official Language

This article says that Swahili is the official language of several countries, including South Sudan. However, the article on South Sudan says that the official language there is English, though Swahili is spoken. Which article is correct? Ehgarrick (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Swahili_language/Archive_4&oldid=1235843169"