Talk:SpyHunter: Nowhere to Run

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

TheoTown (5 participants)
Redout (video game) (10 participants)
Old Grandma Hardcore (4 participants)
CarX Street (5 participants)
WePlay AniMajor (1 participant)
İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (2 participants)
Zero Hour (video game) (4 participants; relisted)
VoxelStorm (1 participant; relisted)
Gilman Louie (4 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Salvidrim! ✉ 23:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SpyHunter: Nowhere to Run → Spy Hunter: Nowhere to Run – According to WP:NCVG "Use the most commonly accepted English name first". All reviews listed at Metacritic ([1]) use "Spy Hunter" with a space.

Also according to guideline #5: "When naming articles for specific games in a series it is best to be consistent throughout the entire series as much as possible". All Spy Hunter articles had consistency, until this article was moved on January 10. Mika1h (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. These reviews have more weight, especially collectively, than the box cover. --BDD (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.