Talk:Spellbound (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Melee (game terminology) (0 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Richard Darling

Was Richard Darling ever involved in the actual development of this game. Yes, he and his brother David had a partnership with Mastertronic at the time, but I can't remember (nor find any references to this fact, except the listings in Moby et al) him ever having anything to do with the Magic Knight series. Did he do any of the ports - C64 perhaps? Or is it a mixup with Spellbound Dizzy? --Frodet 22:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He's not mentioned as a developer of the Spectrum version but Lemon64 mentions him in connection with the Commodore 64 version [1] -- Zagrebo 15:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spellbound128.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Spellbound128.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 20 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Spellbound128.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:20, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]