Talk:Sorong
Appearance
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
File:SORONG2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:SORONG2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
| |
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC) |
Requested move 7 November 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 17:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
– The city is clearly the primary topic per the pageviews statistic Bluesatellite (talk) 13:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Support Per WP:2DABPRIMARY and WP:DABCONCEPT, this looks to be similar to Gloucester/Gloucestershire where the administrative unit has a longer name and presumably is named after the city. Crouch, Swale (talk) 14:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom and User:Crouch, Swale, — AjaxSmack 23:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.