Jump to content

Talk:Something Borrowed (Torchwood)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSomething Borrowed (Torchwood) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 24, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Revelation at the end

[edit]

When Jack was going through the pictures of himself, there was one of his wedding day. Was that Estelle, or was it Gwyneth, or was it somebody else altogether? My eyes sort of couldn't tell.~ZytheTalk to me! 22:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else, someone who hasn't been on the show before Starhunterfan (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be worth mentioning that Tainted Love was playing at the end of the disco, having previously been heard in The End of the World (Doctor Who)? 90.204.163.238 (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not really... there's no story conection. EdokterTalk 23:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lady in Black

[edit]

Who played the Lady in Black (Nostrovite)? shouldn't that be added to the cast list? AlbertHall (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Banana?

[edit]

Is this corect? (I have not seen this episode but this looks like creatove vandalism)

Her presence is detected by Tosh and Banana.

Nope... his name is really Banana. -- 66.167.244.240 (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Something Borrowed (Torchwood)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 15:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Image: The image is being considered for deletion, sort this out; might I suggest adding a better rationale than just "To illustrate a key element of the plot."
It was fine when I nominated the article. I've tried to flesh out the rationale as much as possible and have emphasised comments in the reception section which discuss this as a plot development.
  • Lede: Link 'second series'
Linked.
  • Plot: I feel that 'synopsis' under plot is kind of redundant, since there isn't another section
Removed subheading.
  • Plot: "half-eaten corpse" Who's corpse is this?
Clarified.
  • References: I believe you should always have a reference tag after a direct quote. For instance, after "…commonly seen on soaps"; "…good performances from the team"; "cheesy soap opera moments"; etc.
WP:CITEFOOT just states "it is usually sufficient to add the citation to the end of the sentence or paragraph, so long as it's clear which source supports which part of the text". I think it's clear that in the case of the reviews that the direct quotes are attributed the review cited. I feel that having the same reference used successively looks a bit untidy, but I'm happy to change it if necessary.
  • References: Ref 10 I would just cite as "Andy et al, p. 82"
Done.
  • References: Ref 14 seems to have broken link to Digital Spy
Fixed.
  • Bibliography: I would order this alphabetically
Done.

Those are the only issues. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your prompt review! Eshlare (talk) 05:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I think everything looks fine. I'm going to keep it on hold until the picture deal is sorted out, though.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:58, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Pic problem has cleared up. Passing. Congrats!--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:34, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Something Borrowed (Torchwood). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]