Talk:Soma Bringer

Soma Bringer has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 4, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soma Bringer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Soma Bringer" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games: Nintendo Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

main characters

In this game Welt(Velt) and Idea are the essencial main characters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.91.29 (talk) 08:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soma Bringer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JDC808 (talk · contribs) 17:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

First para:

Link "dungeon", "real-time combat" (not sure of the correct link for that), and "top-down perspective". "three-dimensional" and "Multiplayer" could also be linked.

Second para:

role-playing game can be linked.
Spell out "co-op" and link it (in parenthesis, you could put "co-op" and use that shorthand from thereafter).

Gameplay

Anything that I said to link above that isn't already linked here, link them here as well.

First para:

single player -> single-player (and make sure any other instance of "single player" includes the dash).
the players control -> the player controls

Second para:

"...are mapped to the DS face buttons." Spell out Nintendo DS, link it, and make it possessive.

Third para:

respawn - > respawns
Link buffs and debuffs

Synopsis

"At some point prior to the game's opening, mysterious monsters called Visitors being appearing..." I believe that is supposed to be "began appearing"?

Development

Since I said to link Nintendo DS above in Gameplay, unlink it here.

These are what I saw on the first read through. Also did some minor copy/editing. After you've addressed these, I'll have a second read through. --JDC808 ♫ 18:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JDC808: I've addressed the issues you raised above. --ProtoDrake (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Nice article. --JDC808 ♫ 18:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]