Talk:Soldier Blade
Appearance
Soldier Blade has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 18, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
A fact from Soldier Blade appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 February 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Soldier Blade/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TarkusAB (talk · contribs) 03:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Gameplay
[edit]- No comment
Development
[edit]- 6M HuCard. Could you link the M to whatever size this is referring to? Is it Megabits? It's not Megabytes.
Release
[edit]- as a 600-point download. This should be removed as we typically don't list game prices unless it's notable somehow. Also this means nothing as 600-points has no sense of value to those who never used the eshop and don't know the conversion.
- "In 2009 it was re-released for the PlayStation Network service under the Game Archives brand in Japan. A digital version for the Wii U Virtual Console was released in 2014." No source
Reception
[edit]- "Player One magazine found it to be mucky" I don't know what mucky means in this context and other readers might not. If it's a direct quote, put quotation marks around it, otherwise maybe use a better word.
Lead
[edit]- I think it's disingenuous to call the Virtual Console re-releases "ports". Ports are conversions, rewriting game code to run on different hardware. In this case, it's just emulation. So maybe call them "re-releases" or something.
Other
[edit]- Everything else looks fine. TarkusABtalk/contrib 03:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- I believe I fixed everything. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 04:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)