Talk:Sirgah
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Sirgah be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Requested move
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus was reached after 3 weeks and a relisting. There was no follow-up from uninvolved editors about the proof that "the variant 'Seirgah' is more standard for enwiki transliteration standards. Per rm procedure, page is not moved. Consider adding also Romanized as Sīrgāh or Seīrgāh– in the lead as suggested by DerBorg. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 21:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Sirgah → Seirgah – I add the requested move in the standard form after Mapmeister requested it. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)--Relisting. -- Tavix (talk) 02:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Carlossuarez46, the user who created the page and the related provincial navbox. Details for the reason of my vote are here, in which he explained the reasons of this transliteration. Anyway, at least, we can add the text –also Romanized as Sīrgāh or Seīrgāh– in the lead. Btw, if is proved that the variant "Seirgah" is more standard for enwiki transliteration standards, I could change my vote. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Per my explanation, here, in which I respond to the comments. I do believe we should add the text –also Romanized as Sīrgāh– since it is already publicized that way, although incorrectly. Mapmeister (talk) 16:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Seirgah is the better spelling for this Persian word and how it's pronounced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:249:304:4FF0:B9B0:E6BA:5CA1:8241 (talk) 22:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.