Talk:Science Saru
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article cleanup
[edit]@LainEverliving: – I see you've been working extensively with this article. You'll notice that I removed a number of citations, all to the non-credible ANN Encyclopedia, but I got to reading the article, and I'd like to say your style and writing is very-well done, as well as the organization, but there seems to be a much heavier emphasis on the studio's individual productions and the awards those productions received than is necessary. There's too much in the prose regarding these individual works themselves, and not enough about how they're important to Saru's cultural, historical, or creator-related identity. In that way, it feels like the article is more about these works, rather than the studio itself; in other words, the article stagnates into what I would call being "off-topic." Of course, it's fine to mention all of these works in the prose somewhere, if you'd like, but the amount of content about them, some with little to do with the areas I've mentioned, feel very off-topic. I was wondering if you would be willing to try cleaning that up; it would make for a more Saru-centralized article, which is the goal, as I see it. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 08:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 15 August 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 01:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Science SARU → Science Saru
- NAZ (studio) → Naz (studio) — Per MOS:TMRULES and WP:TITLECAPS, all caps titles should only be used in place of an abbreviation (like MAPPA) or if that is how it is pronounced (like SynergySP), however, neither of those are the case for these studios, so they should not be in all caps. LainEverliving previously moved this page to the all caps title stating that it is how the studio stylized it. However, how the studio styles it is irrelevant in the naming conventions. Link20XX (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Support - Unless it's an acronym, all caps is unnecessary. Primergrey (talk) 15:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- --This discussion has been advertised at WikiProject Companies, WikiProject Anime and manga, WikiProject Animation, and WikiProject Film.— Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 02:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
"Science Saru Inc."
[edit]A Kabushiki gaisha is a joint-stock company. Isn't it more appropriate to say "Science SARU J.s.c." or even something else? Was the company named specifically that somewhere (citations are missing for this)? Fallbackintoreality (t • c) 22:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Disregard the above edit. Fallbackintoreality (t • c) 22:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan Tokyo taskforce
- WikiProject Japan articles
- C-Class anime and manga articles
- Low-importance anime and manga articles
- All WikiProject Anime and manga pages
- C-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- C-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Asian animation articles
- Unknown-importance Asian animation articles
- Asian animation work group articles
- C-Class Animated films articles
- Unknown-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- C-Class Japanese cinema articles
- Japanese cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles