Talk:Isla Salas y Gómez

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands

Polynesia Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile Low‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Size problem?

This island cannot at the same time be between 70 and 300 meters long AND 700 meters long and 2.5 km² in area. Does anyone know the true size? 84.145.145.21 20:47, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You're not understanding the author correctly. I believe what is stated is the fluctuation in size as a result of the tide.

Note

What is considered land is the area above average high tide, and that does not fluctuate. I found a sketch map of the island on page http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/issues/v090n01/p0259-p0261.pdf, with scale, took measurements from it and gauged the area. That should be reasonably accurate. The 2.5 km² were obviously totally wrong. I think someone can now take away the dispute flag, if there is agreement with this. Ratzer 13:30, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the "disputed" tag. The 2.5 km² tag is, as you say, totally wrong, but this figure, whenceëver it originally came, is repeated on a number of sites, witness [1], etc. Happily, this is an inaccuracy that WP clones will soon no longer be propagating. You'll see I've also added a map. I don't know how accurate the scale is, as I kind of "averaged" from several different sources, and it still seems to be in, at the very least, minor conflict with the text of the article. (There's no way to reconcile many of the discrepant measurements given, not only here, but elsewhere.) I think this article should mention the Sala-y-Gómez seamounts as well, and should probably mention the Scott Bank, approx. 1.25 km to the northeast, and rising to less than 25m below sea-level. In other words, it is another peak of the same seamount, just 50m lower. Incidentally, Ratzer, what are you using to view that .PDF? It keeps screwing up on me--it downloads supposedly just fine, but is consistently "corrupted". I'm using AcroRead7. Et tu? Tomer ^TALK 07:24, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

Sala y Gomez PDF document

For me, the old version of Acrobat Reader 5.0 does the job. If you have trouble, go to page http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/issues/v090n01/ first, look for "Sala" on that page and klick on the PDF link. Ratzer 15:59, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

To email a fellow wikipedian, go to their user page, and click "Email this user". Tomer ^TALK 04:27, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Reorg?

Anyone wanna tackle reorganizing the article, now that we've got the facts straightened out and gotten some additional text put together? I'm thinking there's enough to justify sections on at least ==Flora & Fauna==, ==Geology==, etc., and possibly ==History==. In any case, I'm thinking the discussion of after whom the island was named should go closer to the beginning of the article. My proposal:

Opening/Intro
History
Description
Geology
Flora & Fauna
See also
External links

If nobody takes it up, maybe I'll get to it this afternoon...meanwhile, I'd appreciate any comments. Tomer ^TALK 16:33, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

Okie dokie...I took the bull by the horns. Anyone care to help with the cleanup? :-p Tomer ^TALK 04:26, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

The geographical coordinates

Where is Isla Sala y Gómez located at?

26°27′S 105°28′W / 26.450°S 105.467°W / -26.450; -105.467
- Source: These geographical coordinates have been part of the article Isla Sala y Gómez since the article was created. First, they were not in the Coor-Template format. The edit http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Isla_Sala_y_G%C3%B3mez&diff=18828585&oldid=18463514 converted them into the official Coor-Template without changing their values. These geographical coordinates have been unchanged since.
  - My source for these coordinates was de:Sala y Gómez. I regard this as less authorative than the other sources which you have used. Warofdreams talk 09:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
26°28′S 105°28′W / 26.467°S 105.467°W / -26.467; -105.467
- Source: Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names Online.
26°30′55″S 105°17′03″W / 26.51528°S 105.28417°W / -26.51528; -105.28417
- Source: My proposal after having manually checked them with http://maps.msn.com (the method is described in the article Geographic coordinates (obtaining)).
26°28′S 105°00′W / 26.467°S 105.000°W / -26.467; -105.000
- Sources: Several online sources, found after having searched with Google "Isla Sala y Gómez latitude longitude":

I suggest the authoritative source for the coordinates are the current Sailing Directions (here: West Coast of South America): http://pollux.nss.nima.mil/NAV_PUBS/SD/Pub125/. According to this, the coordinates are 26°28′S 105°28′W / 26.467°S 105.467°W / -26.467; -105.467Ratzer 21:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no move. JPG-GR (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be moved to Sala y Gómez, Sala y Gómez Island or Isla Sala y Gómez. The official name is "Sala..." not "Salas..." according to the Chilean law. Here are the decree DFL-2 creating the Provinces of Chile (it says Provincia de Isla de Pascua: Comprende las islas de Pascua y de Sala y Gómez) and the law Nº 16.441 creating the Department of Easter Island (it says el que comprenderá los territorios de las islas de Pascua y de Sala y Gómez). --B1mbo (talk) 01:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Easy there. There is no official name for this island, or for any place in Chile. According to this document, the Military Geographic Institute (IGM) does not have the power to name Chilean locations, nor does any other institution. Therefore, given that there is no authority sanctioning official names, we should use the ones most frequently utilized by State institutions in official documents. Here's a list of official documents giving different names for the island:

Isla Salas y Gómez

Military Geographic Institute:
- Guía Rutera IGM (IV Región)
National Institute of Statistics:
- Chile: Ciudades, Pueblos, Aldeas y Caseríos 2005 (p. 87)
- Compendio Estadístico 2005 (pp. 54-55)
Chilean Navy

Isla Sala y Gómez

National Congress Library:
- Ley Nº16.441 de 1969
- DFL-2-18715 de 1989
Note: The National Congress Library states on its web site that the documents offered should not be considered official, as only those published in the Diario Oficial are official. Thus, these are not realiable as they may contain typos, etc.

As we can see, Isla Salas y Gómez is the only name used in reliable official documents (that I could find).

Even on Google Isla Salas y Gómez is 3.5 times more popular than Isla Sala y Gómez in Chilean web pages.

☆ CieloEstrellado 07:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

A question of the difference

Salas y Gómez is said to be located 390 km east-northeast of Easter Island, but Easter Island lies according to this same article 415 km further west. Mhm... Uka (talk) 19:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Isla Salas y Gómez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]