Talk:Royal Road

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Assyria Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Mid‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philately Low‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey Mid‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Transport

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amcook9.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AndyMazzei.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Euclid

Is there any reason to believe that Euclid was referring to the specific "Royal Road" as opposed to a metaphorical "special path" to make the learning easier for Ptolemy?Czrisher (talk) 20:59, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Far as I know, no other royal road was famous among the Greeks of the time. Jim.henderson (talk) 18:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same question, hopefully more to the point: Is there any reason to believe that the persons referred to in section Cultural References referred to any real, physical road that you once could ride along on a horse? – Actually, I believe that never anybody has provided such a reason, so "by default" one just should not believe in such a "cultural reference" to a "real road," and that section should at most consider such a reference to a real road as a "possibility." – Ok, I am trying a quick fix! -- Lueckless (talk) 09:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC) – So it's a section A Metaphorical “Royal Road” in Famous Quotes now. -- Lueckless (talk) 09:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This should convince that neither Sigmund Freud nor Fred Brooks referred to the Persian Royal Road: In German, Persian Royal Road is Persische Königsstraße – "-straße"! When the section in question attributes "royal road to the unconscious" to Freud, the corresponing German phrase you often find is "Königsweg zum Unbewussten" (DIE ZEIT) or "Königsweg in das Unbewusste" – "-weg"! – Also, the section in question closes as "The phrase was echoed in a modern context in the essay No Silver Bullet where Fred Brooks said of software engineering improvements: "There is no royal road, but there is a road." Now, "silver bullet" in "idiomatic usage" is what "Königsweg" (literally king's way, "a simple yet optimal solution to a problem") is in German, cf. Wiktionary [1][2]. One may already conclude that Brooks referred to "silver bullet," not to the Persian Royal Road.

Freud, however, literally wrote "Die Traumdeutung aber ist die Via regia zur Kenntnis des Unbewußten im Seelenleben." [3] and »Die Traumdeutung ist in Wirklichkeit die Via regia zur Kenntnis des Unbewußten, die sicherste Grundlage der Psychoanalyse.« [4]. So when German authors attribute "Königsweg" to Freud, they are not quoting him, they are rather translating "Via regia" for readers who haven't learnt Latin. Now, did Freud refer to the Persian Royal Road when he wrote "Via regia"? I don't know, but what evidence could support this view? Via Regia, interestingly (the capital "R" perhaps is due to some Wikipedia convention), is something entirely different: "Via Regia, i.e. "Royal Highway", denotes a mediæval historic road. The term, in the usual sense, means not just a specific road, rather a type of road. It was legally associated with the king and remained under his special protection and guarantee of public peace. There were many such roads in the Holy Roman Empire [...]" I think Freud did study historic themes eagerly as a boy, but the Middle Ages? ...

-- Lueckless (talk) 13:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Brooks has just been removed ... -- Lueckless (talk) 17:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Physical Road?

Was there a physical road, perhaps paved, which has left behind actual remains, which could be photographed, or was it just a literary device used by various writers both ancient and modern? If so, then there should be a picture of such road, perhaps with a section on archeological excavation, methods of ancient Persian road building, &c. 67.206.183.40 (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://riversfromeden.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/the-persian-royal-mail/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification of who built the road.

The main article first says The Royal Road was "reorganized and rebuilt" by Darius and then that "Darius built the road..." Are those phrases not contradictory?

Further, when "The Royal Road was an ancient highway...", does that mean ancient in our modern view, or already ancient from Darius' perspective? -- 17:53, 10 September 2021 RobbieGoodwin

It says in the article: "Because the road did not follow the shortest nor the easiest route between the most important cities of the Persian Empire, archeologists believe the westernmost sections of the road may have originally been built by the Assyrian kings" -- AnonMoos (talk) 23:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this not the Chapar Khaneh?

I feel there is some overlap - should the two articles be merged in some description? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.125.112 (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They should at least be correlated. I doubt whether the term "Chapar Khaneh" is very widely known in English... AnonMoos (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]