Talk:Romerike Tunnel

Romerike Tunnel has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 4, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 35, 2010

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wish

Could Lutvann be mentioned in the article (it's a picture of it), in addition to Nordre Puttjern? Geschichte (talk) 16:30, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done[1]. —Sladen (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What about Nordre Puttjern, which was in the news all the time back then? Geschichte (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added, thanks for pointing it out. Arsenikk ^(talk) 17:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Romerike Tunnel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ---Dough 48 72 16:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is the cited information in the lead unique to the article? If not, then it does not need to be cited in the lead.
"The leakages increased the cost of the tunnel from NOK 0.5 billion by an additional NOK 1.3 billion.": reword to indicate the specific amount the tunnel cost.
Combine the sentences "In average 388 man-years were employed during construction. The work involved the removal of 1.62 million tonnes of rock."
In the lead, you converted the length from meters to miles but in the body you converted the length from meters to feet. Can only one of these conversions be used for both?

I am placing the article on hold. ---Dough 48 72 16:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. All changes have been made. Arsenikk ^(talk) 12:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will pass the article. ---Dough 48 72 02:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Longest

Under Construction is mentioned that the Romerike Tunnel is the longest in Norway. I think it should be written the "longest railroad tunnel" as their is a longer street tunnel in Norway. The ac electricity has changed from 16 2/3 to 16.7 Hz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.136.52 (talk) 14:46, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to clarify[2] that it was the longest at the point of opening; and now is the second longest overall after the Lærdal Tunnel. Does that work for you? —Sladen (talk) 10:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

In average 388 man-years were employed during construction – "In average" is not grammatically correct, but I don't believe "On average" is right either. Could this be fixed? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Romerike Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/63dK13cve?url=http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/sd/dok/NOUer/1999/NOU-1999-28/4/2/6.html?id=355320 to http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/sd/dok/NOUer/1999/NOU-1999-28/4/2/6.html?id=355320

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]