Talk:Rival Turf!

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Outfolded (3 participants)
NoFrag (1 participant)
VoxelStorm (0 participants)
GameRevolution (5 participants)
List of longest-running video game franchises (11 participants)
Atomas (1 participant)
PLAY: The Games Festival (3 participants)
FloodSim (3 participants)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (2 participants)
Blast Monkeys (2 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants; relisted)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reverted again

I reverted the article again. The text that was there primarily consisted of ridiculous, unsourced statements such as "Rival Turf utilizes state-of-the-art Blaze Processing, which allows for life-like graphics to be rendered in a near three-dimensional environment" and an absurd controversy section that read, in part "Rival Turf is generally considered to be one of the most controversial games to be released for the Super Nintendo. The thematic material is thought, by some, to be of an extreme adult nature, and therefore the game is simply not suitable for the younger gamers at which it is aimed". Content like this is ideally suited for Uncyclopedia, not Wikipedia. --Jtalledo (talk) 00:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just cleaned up a similar addition. I don't know enough about games to judge the truthfulness of the additional statements, but they do need to be sourced. Katr67 18:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've played the game and the text in question is absolute nonsense. I reverted the article again. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this page the way it is now.

The way the page is now is a compromise of the changes over the last couple of years. I know this is a sensitive issue to many people, including the hardest of the hardcore Rival Turf fans...but how the page appears now is fair to all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.214.47 (talk) 07:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spoken Wikipedia

I am working on an audio version of this article. Newellski (talk) 19:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]